Literature DB >> 21425239

Cytometry of DNA replication and RNA synthesis: Historical perspective and recent advances based on "click chemistry".

Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz1, Frank Traganos, Hong Zhao, H Dorota Halicka, Jiangwei Li.   

Abstract

This review covers progress in the development of cytometric methodologies designed to assess DNA replication and RNA synthesis. The early approaches utilizing autoradiography to detect incorporation of (3) H- or (14) C-labeled thymidine were able to identify the four fundamental phases of the cell cycle G(1) , S, G(2) , and M, and by analysis of the fraction of labeled mitosis (FLM), to precisely define the kinetics of cell progression through these phases. Analysis of (3) H-uridine incorporation and RNA content provided the means to distinguish quiescent G(0) from cycling G(1) cells. Subsequent progress in analysis of DNA replication was based on the use of BrdU as a DNA precursor and its detection by the quenching of the fluorescence intensity of DNA-bound fluorochromes such as Hoechst 33358 or acridine orange as measured by flow cytometry. Several variants of this methodology have been designed and used in studies to detect anticancer drug-induced perturbations of cell cycle kinetics. The next phase of method development, which was particularly useful in studies of the cell cycle in vivo, including clinical applications, relied on immunocytochemical detection of incorporated halogenated DNA or RNA precursors. This approach however was hampered by the need for DNA denaturation, which made it difficult to concurrently detect other cell constituents for multiparametric analysis. The recently introduced "click chemistry" approach has no such limitation and is the method of choice for analysis of DNA replication and RNA synthesis. This method is based on the use of 5-ethynyl-2'deoxyuridine (EdU) as a DNA precursor or 5-ethynyluridine (EU) as an RNA precursor and their detection with fluorochrome-tagged azides utilizing a copper (I) catalyzed [3+2] cycloaddition. Several examples are presented that illustrate incorporation of EdU or EU in cells subjected to DNA damage detected as histone H2AX phosphorylation that have been analyzed by flow or laser scanning cytometry.
Copyright © 2011 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21425239      PMCID: PMC3238687          DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.21048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  66 in total

1.  Analysis of RNA synthesis by cytometry.

Authors:  P O Jensen; J Larsen; J K Larsen
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.441

2.  Cell cycle kinetics estimated by analysis of bromodeoxyuridine incorporation.

Authors:  N H Terry; R A White
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.441

3.  DNA double labelling with IdUrd and CldUrd for spatial and temporal analysis of cell proliferation and DNA replication.

Authors:  J A Aten; P J Bakker; J Stap; G A Boschman; C H Veenhof
Journal:  Histochem J       Date:  1992-05

Review 4.  A short history of the initial application of anti-5-BrdU to the detection and measurement of S phase.

Authors:  Robert C Leif; Jeanne H Stein; Robert M Zucker
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.355

5.  Zinc fixation preserves flow cytometry scatter and fluorescence parameters and allows simultaneous analysis of DNA content and synthesis, and intracellular and surface epitopes.

Authors:  Uffe Birk Jensen; David M Owens; Søren Pedersen; Rikke Christensen
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 6.  Cell-cycle analysis using continuous bromodeoxyuridine labeling and Hoechst 33358-ethidium bromide bivariate flow cytometry.

Authors:  M Poot; H Hoehn; M Kubbies; A Grossmann; Y Chen; P S Rabinovitch
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.441

7.  Immunoseparation and immunodetection of nucleic acids labeled with halogenated nucleotides.

Authors:  S R Haider; G Juan; F Traganos; Z Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 3.905

8.  Segregation of RNA and separate packaging of DNA and RNA in apoptotic bodies during apoptosis.

Authors:  H D Halicka; E Bedner; Z Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 3.905

9.  Flow cytometric measurement of RNA synthesis based on bromouridine labelling and combined with measurement of DNA content or cell surface antigen.

Authors:  P O Jensen; J Larsen; J K Larsen
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.089

10.  Apoptotic cell death triggered by camptothecin or teniposide. The cell cycle specificity and effects of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  G Del Bino; S Bruno; P N Yi; Z Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.831

View more
  24 in total

1.  Relationship of DNA damage signaling to DNA replication following treatment with DNA topoisomerase inhibitors camptothecin/topotecan, mitoxantrone, or etoposide.

Authors:  Hong Zhao; Paulina Rybak; Jurek Dobrucki; Frank Traganos; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.355

2.  Analysis of Cell Proliferation and Homeostasis Using EdU Labeling.

Authors:  Francis A Flomerfelt; Ronald E Gress
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2016

3.  DNA damage signaling, impairment of cell cycle progression, and apoptosis triggered by 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine incorporated into DNA.

Authors:  Hong Zhao; H Dorota Halicka; Jiangwei Li; Ewa Biela; Krzysztof Berniak; Jurek Dobrucki; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 4.355

4.  Investigating the cellular fate of a DNA-targeted platinum-based anticancer agent by orthogonal double-click chemistry.

Authors:  Xin Qiao; Song Ding; Fang Liu; Gregory L Kucera; Ulrich Bierbach
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.358

5.  Genomic Analysis of the DNA Replication Timing Program during Mitotic S Phase in Maize (Zea mays) Root Tips.

Authors:  Emily E Wear; Jawon Song; Gregory J Zynda; Chantal LeBlanc; Tae-Jin Lee; Leigh Mickelson-Young; Lorenzo Concia; Patrick Mulvaney; Eric S Szymanski; George C Allen; Robert A Martienssen; Matthew W Vaughn; Linda Hanley-Bowdoin; William F Thompson
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 6.  Probing the function of long noncoding RNAs in the nucleus.

Authors:  Sajal Medha K Akkipeddi; Anthony J Velleca; Dawn M Carone
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Induction of DNA damage signaling by oxidative stress in relation to DNA replication as detected using "click chemistry".

Authors:  Hong Zhao; Jurek Dobrucki; Paulina Rybak; Frank Traganos; H Dorota Halicka; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 4.355

8.  Deficiency in DNA damage response, a new characteristic of cells infected with latent HIV-1.

Authors:  Dorota Piekna-Przybylska; Gaurav Sharma; Sanjay B Maggirwar; Robert A Bambara
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Cell fixation in zinc salt solution is compatible with DNA damage response detection by phospho-specific antibodies.

Authors:  Hong Zhao; Jiangwei Li; Frank Traganos; H Dorota Halicka; Mirosław Zarebski; Jurek Dobrucki; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.355

10.  Expression of the p12 subunit of human DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ), CDK inhibitor p21(WAF1), Cdt1, cyclin A, PCNA and Ki-67 in relation to DNA replication in individual cells.

Authors:  Hong Zhao; Sufang Zhang; Dazhong Xu; Marietta Ywt Lee; Zhongtao Zhang; Ernest Yc Lee; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.