Literature DB >> 12851481

DNA replication in the face of (In)surmountable odds.

J E Cleaver1, R R Laposa, C L Limoli.   

Abstract

We describe here a model for sequential recruitment of various enzymatic systems that maintain DNA replication fidelity in cells with damaged bases, especially those formed by ultraviolet (UV) irradiation. Systems of increasing complexity but decreasing fidelity are recruited to restore replication of damaged DNA. The first and most accurate response is nucleotide excision repair (NER) that is cell cycle-independent; next come various delaying cell cycle checkpoints that provide an extended time window for NER. These delay the onset of the S phase at the G1/S boundary, and inhibit the initiation of individual replicating units (replicons and clusters of replicons) within the S phase. When checkpoints fail to operate completely, DNA replication forks must negotiate damage and the loss of coding information on the parental DNA strands. Replication can be resumed using bypass polymerases, or alternative bypass mechanisms. Finally, if all else fails, replication forks may degrade to double strand breaks and recombinational processes then allow their reconstruction. A network of signaling kinases modulates the efficiency of many damage responsive proteins to tailor their activities and subcellular localizations by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12851481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  6 in total

Review 1.  Integrating S-phase checkpoint signaling with trans-lesion synthesis of bulky DNA adducts.

Authors:  Laura R Barkley; Haruo Ohmori; Cyrus Vaziri
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.194

2.  Rad18 regulates DNA polymerase kappa and is required for recovery from S-phase checkpoint-mediated arrest.

Authors:  Xiaohui Bi; Laura R Barkley; Damien M Slater; Satoshi Tateishi; Masaru Yamaizumi; Haruo Ohmori; Cyrus Vaziri
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Kinetics of the UV-induced DNA damage response in relation to cell cycle phase. Correlation with DNA replication.

Authors:  Hong Zhao; Frank Traganos; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.355

4.  p53 suppression overwhelms DNA polymerase eta deficiency in determining the cellular UV DNA damage response.

Authors:  Rebecca R Laposa; Luzviminda Feeney; Eileen Crowley; Sebastien de Feraudy; James E Cleaver
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2007-09-05

5.  Expression of a novel peptide derived from PCNA damages DNA and reverses cisplatin resistance.

Authors:  Robert G Lingeman; Robert J Hickey; Linda H Malkas
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Identification of Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimer-Responsive Genes Using UVB-Irradiated Human Keratinocytes Transfected with In Vitro-Synthesized Photolyase mRNA.

Authors:  Gábor Boros; Edit Miko; Hiromi Muramatsu; Drew Weissman; Eszter Emri; Gijsbertus T J van der Horst; Andrea Szegedi; Irén Horkay; Gabriella Emri; Katalin Karikó; Éva Remenyik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.