Literature DB >> 9530791

Regional assessment of joint position sense in the spine.

A Swinkels1, P Dolan.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A test-retest design was used to assess the reproducibility of position sense measurements of the spine recorded at T1, T7, L1, and S2.
OBJECTIVES: To measure position sense at four spinal levels in healthy volunteers and to determine if this varies on a day-to-day basis. The overall purpose is to provide baseline data for studying position sense of the spine in patients with spinal lesions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Position sense, which is one component of proprioception, is assessed by the ability to reposition the body after displacement. In peripheral joints, position sense is accurate to within a few degrees. Studies on the spine suggest similar accuracy, but most have used indirect methods of measurement that often incorporate unusual extraneous cues.
METHODS: Spinal position sense was assessed in 20 healthy volunteers using an electromagnetic movement sensor system, the 3-Space Fastrak (Polhemus, Colchester, VT), to measure absolute error in actively reproducing upright and flexed positions during movements in both coronal and sagittal planes. Three randomized measurements were taken for each position in one testing session, and measurements were repeated in all participants 2 weeks later.
RESULTS: Same-day measurements indicate that spinal position sense is reproducible in upright postures to within a mean of 3.79 +/- 2.56 for movements in the sagittal plane and 2.26 +/- 1.59 degrees for movements in the coronal plane. Corresponding measurements for flexed postures are 5.27 degrees +/- 3.47 degrees and 3.70 +/- 2.62 degrees, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients between repeated measurements are generally good in the sagittal plane but are affected by side dominance in the coronal plane. Also, repositioning errors tend to increase on ascending the spine. Repeat measurements taken 2 weeks later show similar values.
CONCLUSIONS: 1) Healthy volunteers were able to reposition their spine with considerable accuracy as measured with the 3-Space Fastrak; 2) this ability does not change significantly on a day-to-day basis; and 3) the 3-Space Fastrak offers a noninvasive and accurate method for the measurement of spinal position sense.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9530791     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199803010-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  14 in total

1.  Three-dimensional study of pelvic asymmetry on anatomical specimens and its clinical perspectives.

Authors:  Christophe Boulay; Christine Tardieu; Charles Bénaim; Jérome Hecquet; Catherine Marty; Dominique Prat-Pradal; Jean Legaye; Ginette Duval-Beaupère; Jacques Pélissier
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Head and neck position sense.

Authors:  Bridget Armstrong; Peter McNair; Denise Taylor
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Preliminary study: reliability of the spinal wheel. A novel device to measure spinal postures applied to sitting and standing.

Authors:  Liba Sheeran; Valerie Sparkes; Monica Busse; Robert van Deursen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Evaluation of the kinesthetic sense and function of the hand in early period in operated cervical disc hernia.

Authors:  Býlge Kara; Yücel Yildirim; Dýdem Karadýbak; Umýt Acar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Falls, fractures, and hip pads.

Authors:  Mehrsheed Sinaki
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  A study of postural changes after abdominal rectus plication abdominoplasty.

Authors:  M Mazzocchi; L A Dessy; S Di Ronza; P Iodice; R Saggini; N Scuderi
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  Critical appraisal of physical rehabilitation measures after osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

Authors:  Mehrsheed Sinaki
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Validation of spinal motion with the spine reposition sense device.

Authors:  Cheryl M Petersen; Peter J Rundquist
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Three dimensional evaluation of posture in standing with the PosturePrint: an intra- and inter-examiner reliability study.

Authors:  Martin C Normand; Martin Descarreaux; Donald D Harrison; Deed E Harrison; Denise L Perron; Joseph R Ferrantelli; Tadeusz J Janik
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2007-09-24

10.  A new measurement method for spine reposition sense.

Authors:  Cheryl M Petersen; Chris L Zimmermann; Steven Cope; Mary Ellen Bulow; Erinn Ewers-Panveno
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.