Literature DB >> 18364587

Esophageal motility disorders in terms of pressure topography: the Chicago Classification.

Peter J Kahrilas1, Sudip K Ghosh, John E Pandolfino.   

Abstract

Two recent advances have revolutionized the performance of clinical esophageal manometry; the introduction of practical high resolution manometry (HRM) systems and the development of sophisticated algorithms to display the expanded manometric dataset as pressure topography plots. We utilized a large clinical experience of 400 consecutive patients and 75 control subjects to develop a systematic approach to analyzing esophageal motility using HRM and pressure topography plots. The resultant classification scheme has been named as the Chicago Classification of esophageal motility. Two strengths of pressure topography plots compared with conventional manometric recordings were the ability to (1) delineate the spatial limits, vigor, and integrity of individual contractile segments along the esophagus and (2) to distinguish between loci of compartmentalized intraesophageal pressurization and rapidly propagated contractions. Making these distinctions objectified the identification of distal esophageal spasm, vigorous achalasia, functional obstruction, and nutcracker esophagus subtypes. Applying these distinctions made the diagnosis of spastic disorders quite rare: spasm in 1.5% of patients, vigorous achalasia in 1.5%, and a newly defined entity, spastic nutcracker, in 1.5%. Ultimately, further clinical experience will be the judge, but it is our expectation that pressure topography analysis of HRM data, along with its well-defined functional implications, will prove valuable in the clinical management of esophageal motility disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18364587      PMCID: PMC2895002          DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31815ea291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  13 in total

1.  Application of topographical methods to clinical esophageal manometry.

Authors:  R E Clouse; A Staiano; A Alrakawi; L Haroian
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; John E Pandolfino; Qing Zhang; Andrew Jarosz; Nimeesh Shah; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 4.052

4.  Quantifying EGJ morphology and relaxation with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Sudip K Ghosh; Qing Zhang; Andrew Jarosz; Nimeesh Shah; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 4.052

5.  Topography of the esophageal peristaltic pressure wave.

Authors:  R E Clouse; A Staiano
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1991-10

6.  Deglutitive upper esophageal sphincter relaxation: a study of 75 volunteer subjects using solid-state high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; John E Pandolfino; Qing Zhang; Andrew Jarosz; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 7.  Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities.

Authors:  S J Spechler; D O Castell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 8.  American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; R E Clouse; W J Hogan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Abnormal esophageal motility. An analysis of concurrent radiographic and manometric findings.

Authors:  B T Massey; W J Dodds; W J Hogan; J G Brasseur; J F Helm
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Sudip K Ghosh; John Rice; John O Clarke; Monika A Kwiatek; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  84 in total

1.  Patients with esophageal motility disorders show distinct patterns based on axial force measurements.

Authors:  F H Lundager; J Tack; K Blondeau; A M Drewes; H Gregersen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Impedance as an adjunct to manometric testing to investigate symptoms of dysphagia: What it has failed to do and what it may tell us in the future.

Authors:  T Omari; J Tack; N Rommel
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.623

3.  Phenotypes and clinical context of hypercontractility in high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (EPT).

Authors:  Sabine Roman; John E Pandolfino; Joan Chen; Lubomyr Boris; Daniel Luger; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  The relationship between esophageal peristalsis and in vivo intraband pressure measurements in gastric banding patients.

Authors:  Martin Fried; Sudip K Ghosh; Mario Gutierrez; Karin Dolezalova; Tamara Widenhouse; Gaspar Gayoso
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Interobserver variability in esophageal body measurements with high-resolution manometry among new physician users.

Authors:  Erick Raj Singh; Christopher Rife; Steven Clayton; Peter Naas; Paul Nietert; Donald O Castell
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.062

6.  Can high resolution manometry parameters for achalasia be obtained by conventional manometry?

Authors:  Fernando Am Herbella; Marco G Patti
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2015-08-15

Review 7.  Esophageal motor disorders in terms of high-resolution esophageal pressure topography: what has changed?

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 8.  The Relevance of Spastic Esophageal Disorders as a Diagnostic Category.

Authors:  Michelle P Clermont; Nitin K Ahuja
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-08-06

9.  Criteria for assessing esophageal motility in laparoscopic adjustable gastric band patients: the importance of the lower esophageal contractile segment.

Authors:  Paul Robert Burton; Wendy A Brown; Cheryl Laurie; Geoff Hebbard; Paul E O'Brien
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  The value of high-resolution manometry in the assessment of the resting characteristics of the lower esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  Shahin Ayazi; Jeffrey A Hagen; Joerg Zehetner; Oliver Ross; Calvin Wu; Arzu Oezcelik; Emmanuele Abate; Helen J Sohn; Farzaneh Banki; John C Lipham; Steven R DeMeester; Tom R Demeester
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.