Literature DB >> 8831535

Audit of sphincter repair. Factors associated with poor outcome.

N Nikiteas1, S Korsgen, D Kumar, M R Keighley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to critically analyze the outcome of sphincter repair and, if possible, to identify high-risk factors.
METHODS: Clinical and physiologic assessment was made of all sphincter repairs (42 patients) performed in one unit by two surgeons during five years.
RESULTS: Forty-two patients (10 men, 32 women) underwent sphincter repair. Only three of five men with anterior defects of the anorectum from perineal trauma were rendered continent. Only three of five men with defects from fistula operations became continent, but one improved by later graciloplasty. All six women with fistula-related injuries eventually achieved continence, but two required repeat sphincter repairs because of early breakdown from sepsis. The worst results were in 26 women with third-degree obstetric injuries, of whom 11 remain incontinent; poor results in this group were associated with gross perineal descent, obesity, and age older than 50 years; two or more of these factors indicated a poor outcome. Preoperative anorectal physiology did not identify a poor-risk group.
CONCLUSIONS: Poor results were identified in women with anterior defects from obstetric trauma, especially if they were obese, older than 50 years of age, and had perineal descent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8831535     DOI: 10.1007/bf02081420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  14 in total

1.  Sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence in the era of sacral nerve modulation.

Authors:  Donato F Altomare; Michele De Fazio; Ramona Tiziana Giuliani; Giorgio Catalano; Filippa Cuccia
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Anterior sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence: predicting incontinence relapse.

Authors:  Brendan P McManus; Stephen Allison; Julio Hernánchez-Sánchez
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Functional outcome after anal sphincter injury and treatment with mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Levilester Salcedo; Marc Penn; Margot Damaser; Brian Balog; Massarat Zutshi
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 6.940

4.  Anal sphincter repair for fecal incontinence: experience from a tertiary care centre.

Authors:  Suchita Chase; Rohin Mittal; Mark Ranjan Jesudason; Sukria Nayak; Benjamin Perakath
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-07

Review 5.  Anal incontinence-sphincter ani repair: indications, techniques, outcome.

Authors:  Susan Galandiuk; Leslie A Roth; Quincy J Greene
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Overlapping sphincteroplasty: is it the standard of care?

Authors:  Laura H Goetz; Ann C Lowry
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-02

7.  Evaluation of anal incontinence: minimal approach, maximal effectiveness.

Authors:  Harry T Papaconstantinou
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-02

Review 8.  Obesity and pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  W Jerod Greer; Holly E Richter; Alfred A Bartolucci; Kathryn L Burgio
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  Continence disorders after anal surgery--a relevant problem?

Authors:  A Ommer; F A Wenger; T Rolfs; M K Walz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Suboptimal results after sphincteroplasty: another hazard of obesity.

Authors:  K D Hong; G DaSilva; J T Dollerschell; S D Wexner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.