Aurore Fehlmann1,2, Barbara Reichetzer3, Stéphane Ouellet3, Catherine Tremblay3, Marie-Eve Clermont3. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Université de Montréal and Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Canada. aurore.fehlmann@hcuge.ch. 2. Department of Paediatrics, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medecine, Geneva, Switzerland. aurore.fehlmann@hcuge.ch. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Université de Montréal and Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is not rare, and its consequences are multiple and potentially severe, especially for young women. Some dedicated perineal clinics have been established to improve the management of OASI. Despite their obvious importance, these specific clinics are underrepresented and underdeveloped. The objectives of this review are to explore various options for developing a peripartum perineal clinic and to compare the different practices regarding the mode of delivery for subsequent pregnancies after an OASI. METHODS: This narrative review covers information from patients' questionnaires specific to anal incontinence, anal physiology assessment, pelvic floor and anal sphincter imaging, and the arguments for choosing the mode of delivery after an OASI. RESULTS: This review highlights the extensive range of practices regarding the delivery mode after an OASI throughout national professional organizations and experienced perineal clinics. CONCLUSION: This review summarizes the different choices in developing a perineal clinic to facilitate their development in promoting health care and education specific for peripartum women concerning the perineal consequences of delivery for obstetrician-gynaecologists, family doctors, and residents.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is not rare, and its consequences are multiple and potentially severe, especially for young women. Some dedicated perineal clinics have been established to improve the management of OASI. Despite their obvious importance, these specific clinics are underrepresented and underdeveloped. The objectives of this review are to explore various options for developing a peripartum perineal clinic and to compare the different practices regarding the mode of delivery for subsequent pregnancies after an OASI. METHODS: This narrative review covers information from patients' questionnaires specific to anal incontinence, anal physiology assessment, pelvic floor and anal sphincter imaging, and the arguments for choosing the mode of delivery after an OASI. RESULTS: This review highlights the extensive range of practices regarding the delivery mode after an OASI throughout national professional organizations and experienced perineal clinics. CONCLUSION: This review summarizes the different choices in developing a perineal clinic to facilitate their development in promoting health care and education specific for peripartum women concerning the perineal consequences of delivery for obstetrician-gynaecologists, family doctors, and residents.