Literature DB >> 20006735

GADD45a-GFP GreenScreen HC assay results for the ECVAM recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of new genotoxicity tests.

Louise Birrell1, Paul Cahill, Chris Hughes, Matthew Tate, Richard M Walmsley.   

Abstract

A recent ECVAM workshop considered how to reduce falsely predictive positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing, and thus to avoid unnecessary follow-up with tests involving animals. As it was anticipated that modified versions of existing assays as well as new assays might contribute to a solution, an expert panel was asked to identify a list of chemicals that could be used in the evaluation of such assays. Three categories of test chemicals were chosen comprising a total of 62 compounds. This paper provides test results for these chemicals using the GreenScreen HC assay. All tests were carried out in triplicate, by multiple operators, with and without S9, using invariant protocols. Group 1 chemicals should be detected as positive in in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity tests: 18/20 (90%) were reproducibly positive in GreenScreen HC. Group 2 chemicals should give negative results in in vitro genotoxicity tests: 22/23 (96%) were reproducibly negative in GreenScreen HC. Overall concordance for Groups 1 and 2 is 93%. Group 3 chemicals should give negative results in in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity tests, but have been reported to induce chromosomal aberrations or Tk mutations in mouse lymphoma cells, often at high concentrations or at high levels of cytotoxicity: 13/17 (76%) were reproducibly negative in GreenScreen HC. Of the four positive compounds in Group 3, p-nitrophenol was only positive at the top dose (10mM), 2,4-DCP is an in vivo genotoxin, and two chemicals are antioxidant compounds that may be acting as pro-oxidants in the hyperoxic conditions of cell culture. Overall, these predictive figures are similar to those from other studies with the GreenScreen HC assay and confirm its high specificity, which in turn minimizes the generation of falsely predictive positive results. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20006735     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2009.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  10 in total

Review 1.  How accurate is in vitro prediction of carcinogenicity?

Authors:  Richard Maurice Walmsley; Nicholas Billinton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  The Extended ToxTracker Assay Discriminates Between Induction of DNA Damage, Oxidative Stress, and Protein Misfolding.

Authors:  Giel Hendriks; Remco S Derr; Branislav Misovic; Bruno Morolli; Fabienne M G R Calléja; Harry Vrieling
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Dynamically monitoring cellular γ-H2AX reveals the potential of carcinogenicity evaluation for genotoxic compounds.

Authors:  Minmin Qu; Hua Xu; Wuju Li; Jia Chen; Yajiao Zhang; Bin Xu; Zhi Li; Tao Liu; Lei Guo; Jianwei Xie
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 4.  Emerging metrology for high-throughput nanomaterial genotoxicology.

Authors:  Bryant C Nelson; Christa W Wright; Yuko Ibuki; Maria Moreno-Villanueva; Hanna L Karlsson; Giel Hendriks; Christopher M Sims; Neenu Singh; Shareen H Doak
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Development of human cell biosensor system for genotoxicity detection based on DNA damage-induced gene expression.

Authors:  Valerija Zager; Maja Cemazar; Irena Hreljac; Tamara T Lah; Gregor Sersa; Metka Filipic
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Development of a Fish Cell Biosensor System for Genotoxicity Detection Based on DNA Damage-Induced Trans-Activation of p21 Gene Expression.

Authors:  Deyu Geng; Zhixia Zhang; Huarong Guo
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-09-10

7.  Evaluation of impedance-based label-free technology as a tool for pharmacology and toxicology investigations.

Authors:  Franck André Atienzar; Helga Gerets; Karen Tilmant; Gaëlle Toussaint; Stéphane Dhalluin
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-03-15

8.  QSAR ligand dataset for modelling mutagenicity, genotoxicity, and rodent carcinogenicity.

Authors:  Davy Guan; Kevin Fan; Ian Spence; Slade Matthews
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2018-02-02

9.  The BlueScreen HC assay to predict the genotoxic potential of fragrance materials.

Authors:  Yax Thakkar; Kaushal Joshi; Christina Hickey; Joseph Wahler; Brian Wall; Sylvain Etter; Benjamin Smith; Peter Griem; Matthew Tate; Frank Jones; Gladys Oudraogo; Stefan Pfuhler; Christopher Choi; Gary Williams; Helmut Greim; Gerhard Eisenbrand; Wolfgang Dekant; Anne Marie Api
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 10.  Evaluation of the Suitability of Mammalian In Vitro Assays to Assess the Genotoxic Potential of Food Contact Materials.

Authors:  Elisabeth Pinter; Bernhard Rainer; Thomas Czerny; Elisabeth Riegel; Benoît Schilter; Maricel Marin-Kuan; Manfred Tacker
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-02-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.