Literature DB >> 15787705

Bi-hemispheric contribution to functional motor recovery of the affected forelimb following focal ischemic brain injury in rats.

Jeff Biernaskie1, Aleksandra Szymanska, Victoria Windle, Dale Corbett.   

Abstract

In many recovering hemiparetic stroke patients, movement of the affected limb elicits ipsilateral activation of sensorimotor areas within the undamaged hemisphere, which is not observed in control subjects. Following middle cerebral artery occlusion, rats received intensive enriched-rehabilitation (ER) of the impaired forelimb for 4 weeks. Weekly assessments on a skilled reaching test demonstrated significant improvement in ischemic animals over 4 weeks of ER (P < 0.05). We hypothesized that if the undamaged forelimb motor cortex contributed to improved forelimb function, then inhibition of neural activity within this region should reinstate (at least some of) the initial motor impairment. After 3 and 4 weeks of ER, animals received a microinjection of lidocaine hydrochloride into the undamaged motor cortex and were re-assessed on reaching ability. The behavioral effect of lidocaine challenge was dependent on the size of the infarct: animals with large infarcts were rendered unable to retrieve any food pellets and had great difficulty even contacting a pellet with the affected forepaw. Small-infarct animals were only moderately affected (25% reduction in success) by lidocaine, an effect similar to that observed in control animals. Qualitative assessments of recovered reaching after 4 weeks of rehabilitation revealed that impairments in forelimb lift, advance and aim were exacerbated (P < 0.05) following lidocaine-inactivation of the undamaged motor cortex of animals with large ischemic infarcts. In animals with small infarcts, lidocaine challenge only impaired limb advance. Thus, recruitment of the undamaged hemisphere may depend on the functional integrity of the remaining sensorimotor system. These data suggest that, in the rat, the undamaged (ipsilateral) motor system may contribute to compensatory recovery of the affected forelimb.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15787705     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03899.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  62 in total

1.  Predictors of response to treadmill exercise in stroke survivors.

Authors:  Judith M Lam; Christoph Globas; Joachim Cerny; Benjamin Hertler; Kamil Uludag; Larry W Forrester; Richard F Macko; Daniel F Hanley; Clemens Becker; Andreas R Luft
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Forelimb training drives transient map reorganization in ipsilateral motor cortex.

Authors:  David T Pruitt; Ariel N Schmid; Tanya T Danaphongse; Kate E Flanagan; Robert A Morrison; Michael P Kilgard; Robert L Rennaker; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Speed of motor re-learning after experimental stroke depends on prior skill.

Authors:  Maximilian Schubring-Giese; Katiuska Molina-Luna; Benjamin Hertler; Manuel M Buitrago; Daniel F Hanley; Andreas R Luft
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  In vivo voltage-sensitive dye imaging in adult mice reveals that somatosensory maps lost to stroke are replaced over weeks by new structural and functional circuits with prolonged modes of activation within both the peri-infarct zone and distant sites.

Authors:  Craig E Brown; Khatereh Aminoltejari; Heidi Erb; Ian R Winship; Timothy H Murphy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Early poststroke experience differentially alters periinfarct layer II and III cortex.

Authors:  Jared Clarke; Kristopher D Langdon; Dale Corbett
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 6.200

6.  Abnormalities in skilled reaching movements are improved by peripheral anesthetization of the less-affected forelimb after sensorimotor cortical infarcts in rats.

Authors:  A O'Bryant; B Bernier; T A Jones
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Motor compensation and its effects on neural reorganization after stroke.

Authors:  Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Stimulation targeting higher motor areas in stroke rehabilitation: A proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study of effectiveness and underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  David A Cunningham; Nicole Varnerin; Andre Machado; Corin Bonnett; Daniel Janini; Sarah Roelle; Kelsey Potter-Baker; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Xiaofeng Wang; Guang Yue; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.406

9.  Beneficial effects of gfap/vimentin reactive astrocytes for axonal remodeling and motor behavioral recovery in mice after stroke.

Authors:  Zhongwu Liu; Yi Li; Yisheng Cui; Cynthia Roberts; Mei Lu; Ulrika Wilhelmsson; Milos Pekny; Michael Chopp
Journal:  Glia       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 7.452

10.  Modulating cortical connectivity in stroke patients by rTMS assessed with fMRI and dynamic causal modeling.

Authors:  Christian Grefkes; Dennis A Nowak; Ling E Wang; Manuel Dafotakis; Simon B Eickhoff; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.