Literature DB >> 11909906

Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial.

G Kwakkel1, B J Kollen, R C Wagenaar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess long term effects at 1 year after stroke in patients who participated in an upper and lower limb intensity training programme in the acute and subacute rehabilitation phases.
DESIGN: A three group randomised controlled trial with repeated measures was used.
METHOD: One hundred and one patients with a primary middle cerebral artery stroke were randomly allocated to one of three groups for a 20 week rehabilitation programme with an emphasis on (1) upper limb function, (2) lower limb function or (3) immobilisation with an inflatable pressure splint (control group). Follow up assessments within and between groups were compared at 6, 9, and 12 months after stroke.
RESULTS: No statistically significant effects were found for treatment assignment from 6 months onwards. At a group level, the significant differences in efficacy demonstrated at 20 weeks after stroke in favour of the lower limb remained. However, no significant differences in functional recovery between groups were found for Barthel index (BI), functional ambulation categories (FAC),action research arm test (ARAT), comfortable and maximal walking speed, Nottingham health profile part 1(NHP-part 1), sickness impact profile-68 (SIP-68), and Frenchay activities index (FAI) from 6 months onwards. At an individual subject level a substantial number of patients showed improvement or deterioration in upper limb function (n=8 and 5, respectively) and lower limb function (n=19 and 9, respectively). Activities of daily living (ADL) scores showed that five patients deteriorated and four improved beyond the error threshold from 6 months onwards. In particular, patients with some but incomplete functional recovery at 6 months are likely to continue to improve or regress from 6 months onwards.
CONCLUSIONS: On average patients maintained their functional gains for up to 1 year after stroke after receiving a 20 week upper or lower limb function training programme. However, a significant number of patients with incomplete recovery showed improvements or deterioration in dexterity, walking ability, and ADL beyond the error threshold.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11909906      PMCID: PMC1737834          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.72.4.473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  35 in total

1.  Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial.

Authors:  G Kwakkel; R C Wagenaar; J W Twisk; G J Lankhorst; J C Koetsier
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-07-17       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  J H van der Lee; R C Wagenaar; G J Lankhorst; T W Vogelaar; W L Devillé; L M Bouter
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis.

Authors:  G Kwakkel; R C Wagenaar; T W Koelman; G J Lankhorst; J C Koetsier
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  A criterion for stability of the motor function of the lower extremity in stroke patients using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale.

Authors:  T W Vogelaar; G J Lankhorst; A L Verbeek
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1996-03

5.  Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke. A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  C M Dean; R B Shepherd
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Accuracy of physical and occupational therapists' early predictions of recovery after severe middle cerebral artery stroke.

Authors:  G Kwakkel; G M van Dijk; R C Wagenaar
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.477

7.  Stroke unit treatment. 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  B Indredavik; F Bakke; S A Slordahl; R Rokseth; L L Hâheim
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Task-related circuit training improves performance of locomotor tasks in chronic stroke: a randomized, controlled pilot trial.

Authors:  C M Dean; C L Richards; F Malouin
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  The SIP68: a measure of health-related functional status in rehabilitation medicine.

Authors:  M W Post; A de Bruin; L de Witte; A Schrijvers
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Effectiveness of an intensive outpatient rehabilitation program for postacute stroke patients.

Authors:  R A Werner; S Kessler
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.159

View more
  42 in total

1.  Minimal detectable change of the actual amount of use test and the motor activity log: the EXCITE Trial.

Authors:  Shuya Chen; Steven L Wolf; Qin Zhang; Paul A Thompson; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  ARMin: a robot for patient-cooperative arm therapy.

Authors:  Tobias Nef; Matjaz Mihelj; Robert Riener
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities.

Authors:  R Riener; T Nef; G Colombo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches.

Authors:  Christian Grefkes; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Emerging treatments for motor rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  Edward S Claflin; Chandramouli Krishnan; Sandeep P Khot
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2015-04

6.  Modulating cortical connectivity in stroke patients by rTMS assessed with fMRI and dynamic causal modeling.

Authors:  Christian Grefkes; Dennis A Nowak; Ling E Wang; Manuel Dafotakis; Simon B Eickhoff; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Non-pharmacological interventions for the improvement of post-stroke activities of daily living and disability amongst older stroke survivors: A systematic review.

Authors:  Carrie Stewart; Selvarani Subbarayan; Pamela Paton; Elliot Gemmell; Iosief Abraha; Phyo Kyaw Myint; Denis O'Mahony; Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Antonio Cherubini; Roy L Soiza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  [Evidence-based arm rehabilitation--a systematic review of the literature].

Authors:  T Platz
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 9.  The effects of increased dose of exercise-based therapies to enhance motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma V Cooke; Kathryn Mares; Allan Clark; Raymond C Tallis; Valerie M Pomeroy
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 10.  Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective.

Authors:  Vincent S Huang; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.