Literature DB >> 20004908

Word learning by children with phonological delays: differentiating effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density.

Holly L Storkel1, Jill R Hoover.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study examined the ability of 20 preschool children with functional phonological delays and 34 age- and vocabulary-matched typical children to learn words differing in phonotactic probability (i.e., the likelihood of occurrence of a sound sequence) and neighborhood density (i.e., the number of words that differ from a target by one phoneme). Children were exposed to nonwords paired with novel objects in a story and learning was measured by a picture naming task. Results showed that both groups created lexical representations for rare sound sequences from sparse neighborhoods. However, only children with typical development appeared to build on this initial lexical representation to create a full representation of the word (i.e., lexical-semantic connection and semantic representation). It was hypothesized that creating a lexical representation may be too resource demanding for children with phonological delays, leaving few resources available to create a lexical-semantic connection and/or a semantic representation. LEARNING OUTCOMES: The reader will be able to (1) define phonotactic probability; (2) define neighborhood density; (3) identify how these variables impact the word learning process in general; (4) identify potential areas of deficit in the word learning process for children with functional phonological delays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20004908      PMCID: PMC2834829          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Commun Disord        ISSN: 0021-9924            Impact factor:   2.288


  23 in total

1.  Phonotactics, neighborhood activation, and lexical access for spoken words.

Authors:  M S Vitevitch; P A Luce; D B Pisoni; E T Auer
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1999 Jun 1-15       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Sublexical or lexical effects on serial recall of nonwords?

Authors:  Steven Roodenrys; Melinda Hinton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  A 28-year follow-up of adults with a history of moderate phonological disorder: linguistic and personality results.

Authors:  S Felsenfeld; P A Broen; M McGue
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-10

4.  Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Jonna Armbrüster; Tiffany P Hogan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Final consonant discrimination in children: effects of phonological disorder, vocabulary size, and articulatory accuracy.

Authors:  Jan Edwards; Robert A Fox; Catherine L Rogers
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Semantic representation and naming in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Karla K McGregor; Robyn M Newman; Renée M Reilly; Nina C Capone
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Relationships between nonword repetition accuracy and other measures of linguistic development in children with phonological disorders.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Jan Edwards; Mary E Beckman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  A Cross-Sectional Comparison of the Effects of Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density on Word Learning by Preschool Children.

Authors:  Jill R Hoover; Holly L Storkel; Tiffany P Hogan
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Characterizing knowledge deficits in phonological disorders.

Authors:  J Edwards; M Fourakis; M E Beckman; R A Fox
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  The effect of semantic set size on word learning by preschool children.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Suzanne M Adlof
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  8 in total

1.  Applying Item Response Theory to the Development of a Screening Adaptation of the Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation-Second Edition.

Authors:  Tim Brackenbury; Michael J Zickar; Benjamin Munson; Holly L Storkel
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Nexus to Lexis: Phonological Disorders in Children.

Authors:  Judith A Gierut
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 1.761

3.  Density, frequency and the expressive phonology of children with phonological delay.

Authors:  Judith A Gierut; Michele L Morrisette
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2011-12-19

Review 4.  Using network science in the language sciences and clinic.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Nichol Castro
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.484

5.  The role of phonotactic frequency in sentence repetition by children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Jeffry A Coady; Julia L Evans; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Phonological and lexical effects in verbal recall by children with specific language impairments.

Authors:  Jeffry A Coady; Elina Mainela-Arnold; Julia L Evans
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Rapid naming by children with and without specific language impairment.

Authors:  Jeffry A Coady
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Factors that influence fast mapping in children exposed to Spanish and English.

Authors:  Mary Alt; Christina Meyers; Cecilia Figueroa
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 2.297

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.