Literature DB >> 2917799

Screening for breast cancer in Nijmegen. Report of 6 screening rounds, 1975-1986.

P H Peeters1, A L Verbeek, J H Hendriks, M J van Bon.   

Abstract

A population-based screening programme for breast cancer was initiated in Nijmegen in 1975 with mammography as the only screening procedure. Up to January 1987, 6 screening rounds were carried out with a 2-year screening interval. Rates of attendance, referral, biopsy and detection were calculated and numbers of interval cancers are presented in order to give a clear view of what repeated screening can accomplish in a population. At the first screening round the attendance rate was 87% for women under age 50 and 83% for women aged 50-64. For women aged 65 or over the initial attendance rate was 40%. Rates of attendance declined in subsequent years. Detection rates were highest for elderly women at their first examination: 9.5 per 1,000 screened women. Corresponding rates were 5.6 and 2.3 per 1,000 for women aged 50-64 and below 50 respectively. The positive predictive value for referral was, on average, 20% for women under age 50 and 50% for elderly women, although a sharp increase was seen in the last 2 screening examinations for all age-groups. Predictive values for biopsy were higher: 30% on average for women aged under 50 and 60%-70% for elderly women, again with a sharp increase in the last 2 screening rounds. Interval cancer rates, calculated as the number of cancers occurring within 2 years among negatively screened women at risk, showed no particular trend and varied between 0.9-1.3 per 1,000 woman-years after each screening round. Compared to screen-detected cancers, interval cancers occurred more frequently in younger women. In women under age 50, the ratio between screen-detected and interval cancer was about 1:1, while it was about 2:1 for elderly women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2917799     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910430209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  14 in total

1.  Predictors of returning for second round screening at a population based mammographic screening programme in Melbourne, Australia.

Authors:  J Cockburn; P Schofield; V White; D Hill; I Russell
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Specificity of screening in United Kingdom trial of early detection of breast cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-02-08

3.  Long term breast cancer screening in Nijmegen, The Netherlands: the nine rounds from 1975-92.

Authors:  J D Otten; J A van Dijck; P G Peer; H Straatman; A L Verbeek; M Mravunac; J H Hendriks; R Holland
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Practice of breast self examination: disease extent at diagnosis and patterns of surgical care. A report from an Italian study. GIVIO (Interdisciplinary Group for Cancer Care Evaluation).

Authors: 
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Breast screening: a subject for debate.

Authors:  J Austoker; D Sharp
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Mammographic screening for breast cancer in family practice: A review of the literature.

Authors:  D Snadden
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Effect on breast cancer screening response in The Netherlands of inviting women for an additional scientific investigation.

Authors:  P H Peeters; C G Beckers; J M Hogervorst; H J Collette
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Age-specific sensitivities of mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  P G Peer; A L Verbeek; H Straatman; J H Hendriks; R Holland
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Mammography and physician breast exams after the diagnosis of breast cancer in a twin or non-twin sister.

Authors:  J L Richardson; K Danley; G T Mondrus; D Deapen; T Mack
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Nonattendance in the Stockholm mammography screening trial: relative mortality and reasons for nonattendance.

Authors:  E Lidbrink; J Frisell; Y Brandberg; I Rosendahl; L E Rutqvist
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.