Literature DB >> 3129071

A licence for breast cancer screening?

J B Witcombe1.   

Abstract

It is unrealistic to expect that the best results which have been reported from some research programmes will be equalled after the introduction of a nationwide breast screening service in Britain. Stringent methods of quality control will be needed or potential benefits will not be realised. Despite the disadvantages an effective method of accreditation may be the only way to contain the cost to both healthy women and the National Health Service.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1988        PMID： 3129071      PMCID： PMC2546297          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.296.6626.909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN： 0267-0623


  6 in total

1.  Recent trends in breast surgery in the United States and United Kingdom.

Authors:  E R Greenberg; M Stevens
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-06-07

2.  Sensitivity and specificity of first screen mammography in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a preliminary report from five centers.

Authors:  C J Baines; A B Miller; C Wall; D V McFarlane; I S Simor; R Jong; B J Shapiro; L Audet; M Petitclerc; D Ouimet-Oliva
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Mammography and the value of screening.

Authors:  G H Whitehouse
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med       Date:  1985-11

4.  Breast cancer detection: one versus two views.

Authors:  L W Bassett; D H Bunnell; R Jahanshahi; R H Gold; R D Arndt; J Linsman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Screening for breast cancer in Europe: achievements, problems, and future.

Authors:  A Gad; B A Thomas; M Moskowitz
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  1984

6.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321
  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Six years' audit of laboratory workload and rates of referral for colposcopy in a cervical screening programme in three districts.

Authors:  A E Raffle; B Alden; E F Mackenzie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-10-20

2.  Classification of findings in mammography screening--a method to minimise recall anxiety?

Authors:  M Pamilo; J Lönnqvist; A Halttunen; M Soiva; I Suramo
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  A proposal for short-term quality control in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  A L Verbeek; M C Van den Ban; J H Hendriks
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 7.640
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.