Literature DB >> 19959673

Methods used in internal industry clinical trials to assess tobacco risk reduction.

Vaughan W Rees1, Jennifer M Kreslake, Richard J O'Connor, K Michael Cummings, Mark Parascandola, Dorothy Hatsukami, Peter G Shields, Gregory N Connolly.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Methods to assess reduced exposure products should include those that aid in determining likely patterns of human use and exposure. Tobacco industry clinical trial methods may provide insight into strategies to assess potential reduced exposure products (PREP) for public health purposes. Internal tobacco industry documents detailing human clinical research with PREPs were examined to document major research strategies used and identify potentially fruitful methods not currently used in the mainstream arena.
METHODS: Primary data were obtained from records of research conducted internally by tobacco companies and affiliated researchers, and included manuscript drafts, presentations, protocols, and instruments relating to internal clinical trials of human tobacco use and exposure.
RESULTS: Tobacco industry clinical research has focused on reduced exposure products, most notably Premier, Accord, and Eclipse. The most widely used strategy observed is switching studies, and details of study designs and protocols favored by the industry are described. Key measures include biomarkers of exposure (e.g., cotinine, CO, and specific carcinogens) and acute health effects such as physical health and fitness.
CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco industry clinical research has used relatively standard switching study methods, but with a broad set of measures. Clinical switching studies have been conducted by the industry primarily to support existing claims or to develop new claims. Knowledge of prior industry activity can guide and inform future public health research efforts. Although industry clinical trial methods are comparable with current mainstream methods, limited information about the validity of outcome measures used limits their viability for immediate adoption in mainstream science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19959673      PMCID: PMC2795399          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  14 in total

Review 1.  Methods to assess potential reduced exposure products.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Gary A Giovino; Thomas Eissenberg; Pamela I Clark; Deirdre Lawrence; Scott Leischow
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 2.  The ethics of industry experimentation using employees: the case of taste-testing pesticide-treated tobacco.

Authors:  Patricia A McDaniel; Gina Solomon; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-11-29       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire.

Authors:  P W Jones; F H Quirk; C M Baveystock
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.415

Review 4.  Potential reduced exposure products (PREPs) in industry trial testimony.

Authors:  Geoffrey Ferris Wayne
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 5.  Tobacco document research reporting.

Authors:  S M Carter
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  The bronchitis index. A semiquantitative visual scale for the assessment of airways inflammation.

Authors:  A B Thompson; G Huerta; R A Robbins; J H Sisson; J R Spurzem; S von Essen; K A Rickard; D J Romberger; I Rubinstein; M Ghafouri
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 7.  Clinical trials methods for evaluation of potential reduced exposure products.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Karen Hanson; Anna Briggs; Mark Parascandola; Jeanine M Genkinger; Richard O'Connor; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Comparison of measured and FTC-predicted nicotine uptake in smokers.

Authors:  G D Byrd; J H Robinson; W S Caldwell; J D deBethizy
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  A further study of FTC yield and nicotine absorption in smokers.

Authors:  G D Byrd; R A Davis; W S Caldwell; J H Robinson; J D deBethizy
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 10.  Biomarkers of environmental tobacco smoke exposure.

Authors:  N L Benowitz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Postmarketing surveillance for "modified-risk" tobacco products.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 2.  Tobacco and nicotine product testing.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Lois Biener; Scott J Leischow; Mitch R Zeller
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Providing a Science Base for the Evaluation of Tobacco Products.

Authors:  Micah L Berman; Greg Connolly; K Michael Cummings; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Jack E Henningfield; Matthew Myers; Richard J O'Connor; Mark Parascandola; Vaughan Rees; Jerry M Rice; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2015-04

4.  The toxic effects of cigarette additives. Philip Morris' project mix reconsidered: an analysis of documents released through litigation.

Authors:  Marcia S Wertz; Thomas Kyriss; Suman Paranjape; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  Role of Cigarette Smoking on Serum Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme and Its Association With Inflammation and Lipid Peroxidation.

Authors:  Dinesh Nath; Meera Shivasekar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-10

6.  Reduced Exposure to Harmful and Potentially Harmful Smoke Constituents With the Tobacco Heating System 2.1.

Authors:  Frank Lüdicke; Gizelle Baker; John Magnette; Patrick Picavet; Rolf Weitkunat
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.