Literature DB >> 16317198

The ethics of industry experimentation using employees: the case of taste-testing pesticide-treated tobacco.

Patricia A McDaniel1, Gina Solomon, Ruth E Malone.   

Abstract

In the United States, companies that use their own funds to test consumer products on their employees are subject to few regulations. Using previously undisclosed tobacco industry documents, we reviewed the history of that industry's efforts to create internal guidelines on the conditions to be met before employee taste testers could evaluate cigarettes made from tobacco treated with experimental pesticides. This history highlights 2 potential ethical issues raised by unregulated industrial research: conflict of interest and lack of informed consent. To ensure compliance with accepted ethical standards, an independent federal office should be established to oversee industrial research involving humans exposed to experimental or increased quantities of ingested, inhaled, or absorbed chemical agents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16317198      PMCID: PMC1470440          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.071969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  8 in total

1.  Ethics review for sale? Conflict of interest and commercial research review boards.

Authors:  T Lemmens; B Freedman
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Pesticide toxicity, human subjects, and the Environmental Protection Agency's dilemma.

Authors:  H G Robertson; S Gorovitz
Journal:  J Contemp Health Law Policy       Date:  2000

3.  Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire?

Authors:  R E Malone; E D Balbach
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Tobacco control in the wake of the 1998 master settlement agreement.

Authors:  Steven A Schroeder
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-01-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  (Almost) everything you ever wanted to know about informed consent. [Review of: Faden, RR and Beauchamp, TL. A history and theory of informed concsent. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986].

Authors:  A M Capron
Journal:  Med Humanit Rev       Date:  1987-01

Review 6.  Legislating "sound science": the role of the tobacco industry.

Authors:  Annamaria Baba; Daniel M Cook; Thomas O McGarity; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Abandoning informed consent.

Authors:  R M Veatch
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

8.  Tobacco industry documents: comparing the Minnesota Depository and internet access.

Authors:  E D Balbach; R J Gasior; E M Barbeau
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

  8 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  An Exemplary Case of Promotion Activities and Taste Panels from the Perspective of Tobacco Control.

Authors:  Erdem İlker Mutlu; Mustafa Seydioğulları; Dilek Aslan
Journal:  Turk Thorac J       Date:  2015-04-09

Review 2.  Methods used in internal industry clinical trials to assess tobacco risk reduction.

Authors:  Vaughan W Rees; Jennifer M Kreslake; Richard J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Mark Parascandola; Dorothy Hatsukami; Peter G Shields; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.