Literature DB >> 16298718

Methods to assess potential reduced exposure products.

Dorothy K Hatsukami1, Gary A Giovino, Thomas Eissenberg, Pamela I Clark, Deirdre Lawrence, Scott Leischow.   

Abstract

The availability of tobacco products purported to reduce toxin exposure or potentially reduce health risks necessitates the development of methods and identification of biomarkers that can be used to assess these products. These assessments occur on multiple levels and stages, from identifying constituents in the tobacco products and smoke, to human exposure and health effects trials, to postmarketing surveillance. A conference of multidisciplinary experts was convened to present and discuss methods and biomarkers to assess these products and to consider the infrastructure necessary to facilitate the evaluation process. Although no currently available set of measures was thought to be sufficient for determining the relative health risk of potential reduced exposure products, this paper provides a blueprint for future research toward this end.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16298718     DOI: 10.1080/14622200500266015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  25 in total

1.  Delivery of nicotine in an extract of a smokeless tobacco product reduces its reinforcement-attenuating and discriminative stimulus effects in rats.

Authors:  Andrew C Harris; Irina Stepanov; Paul R Pentel; Mark G Lesage
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  The time for tobacco industry sponsored PREP evaluation has arrived.

Authors:  T Eissenberg
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 3.  Biomarkers to assess the utility of potential reduced exposure tobacco products.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Neal L Benowitz; Stephen I Rennard; Cheryl Oncken; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Impact of corrective health information on consumers' perceptions of "reduced exposure" tobacco products.

Authors:  Lois Biener; Karen Bogen; Gregory Connolly
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 5.  Surveillance methods for identifying, characterizing, and monitoring tobacco products: potential reduced exposure products as an example.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Vaughan W Rees; Gregory N Connolly; Kaila J Norton; David Sweanor; Mark Parascandola; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 6.  Methods used in internal industry clinical trials to assess tobacco risk reduction.

Authors:  Vaughan W Rees; Jennifer M Kreslake; Richard J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Mark Parascandola; Dorothy Hatsukami; Peter G Shields; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 7.  Abuse liability assessment of tobacco products including potential reduced exposure products.

Authors:  Lawrence P Carter; Maxine L Stitzer; Jack E Henningfield; Rich J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 8.  Assessing consumer responses to potential reduced-exposure tobacco products: a review of tobacco industry and independent research methods.

Authors:  Vaughan W Rees; Jennifer M Kreslake; K Michael Cummings; Richard J O'Connor; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Mark Parascandola; Peter G Shields; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 9.  Cigarette filter-based assays as proxies for toxicant exposure and smoking behavior--a literature review.

Authors:  John L Pauly; Richard J O'Connor; Geraldine M Paszkiewicz; K Michael Cummings; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Clinical trials methods for evaluation of potential reduced exposure products.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Karen Hanson; Anna Briggs; Mark Parascandola; Jeanine M Genkinger; Richard O'Connor; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.