Literature DB >> 19959672

Clinical trials methods for evaluation of potential reduced exposure products.

Dorothy K Hatsukami1, Karen Hanson, Anna Briggs, Mark Parascandola, Jeanine M Genkinger, Richard O'Connor, Peter G Shields.   

Abstract

Potential reduced exposure products (PREPs) to tobacco toxicants may have promise in reducing tobacco-related morbidity or mortality or may promote greater harm to individuals or the population. Critical to determining the risks or benefits from these products are valid human clinical trial PREP assessment methods. Such an assessment involves determining the effects of these products on biomarkers of exposure and effect, which serve as proxies for harm, and assessing the potential for consumer uptake and abuse of the product. This article identifies critical methodologic issues associated with PREP assessments, reviews the methods that have been used to assess PREPs, and describes the strengths and limitations of these methods. Additionally, recommendations are provided for clinical trial PREP assessment methods and future research directions in this area based on this review and on the deliberations from a National Cancer Institute sponsored Clinical Trials PREP Methods Workshop.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19959672      PMCID: PMC2799338          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  115 in total

1.  Subjective and discriminative stimulus effects of two de-nicotinized cigarettes with different tar yields.

Authors:  L M Schuh; H M Stamat; K K Downey; K J Schuh
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of moist snuff in humans.

Authors:  R V Fant; J E Henningfield; R A Nelson; W B Pickworth
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Carbon monoxide in the expired air of smokers who smoke so-called "light" brands of cigarettes.

Authors:  E Groman; D Blauensteiner; U Kunze; R Schoberberger
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Sensitivity of nicotine-containing and de-nicotinized cigarette consumption to alternative non-drug reinforcement: a behavioral economic analysis.

Authors:  T A Shahan; W K Bickel; G J Badger; L A Giordano
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.293

5.  Comparing the reinforcing efficacy of nicotine containing and de-nicotinized cigarettes: a behavioral economic analysis.

Authors:  T A Shahan; W K Bickel; G J Madden; G J Badger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Withdrawal-suppressing effects of a novel smoking system: comparison with own brand, not own brand, and de-nicotinized cigarettes.

Authors:  A R Buchhalter; L Schrinel; T Eissenberg
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Randomised trial investigating effect of a novel nicotine delivery device (Eclipse) and a nicotine oral inhaler on smoking behaviour, nicotine and carbon monoxide exposure, and motivation to quit.

Authors:  K O Fagerström; J R Hughes; T Rasmussen; P W Callas
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Pharmacodynamic effects of new de-nicotinized cigarettes.

Authors:  W B Pickworth; R V Fant; R A Nelson; M S Rohrer; J E Henningfield
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.244

9.  Preliminary evaluation of a novel smoking system: effects on subjective and physiological measures and on smoking behavior.

Authors:  A R Buchhalter; T Eissenberg
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  Cigarette smoking, oral moist snuff use and glucose intolerance.

Authors:  P G Persson; S Carlsson; L Svanström; C G Ostenson; S Efendic; V Grill
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 8.989

View more
  24 in total

1.  Oral tobacco products: preference and effects among smokers.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Joni Jensen; Amanda Anderson; Berry Broadbent; Sharon Allen; Yan Zhang; Herb Severson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Does switching to reduced ignition propensity cigarettes alter smoking behavior or exposure to tobacco smoke constituents?

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; Vaughan W Rees; Kaila J Norton; K Michael Cummings; Gregory N Connolly; Hillel R Alpert; Andreas Sjödin; Lovisa Romanoff; Zheng Li; Kristie M June; Gary A Giovino
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Biomarkers of Tobacco Exposure: Summary of an FDA-Sponsored Public Workshop.

Authors:  Cindy M Chang; Selvin H Edwards; Aarthi Arab; Arseima Y Del Valle-Pinero; Ling Yang; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Measures for assessing subjective effects of potential reduced-exposure products.

Authors:  Karen Hanson; Richard O'Connor; Dorothy Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  Postmarketing surveillance for "modified-risk" tobacco products.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Electronic nicotine delivery systems: a research agenda.

Authors:  Jean-François Etter; Chris Bullen; Andreas D Flouris; Murray Laugesen; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  A Randomized Clinical Trial of Snus Examining the Effect of Complete Versus Partial Cigarette Substitution on Smoking-Related Behaviors, and Biomarkers of Exposure.

Authors:  Ellen Meier; Bruce R Lindgren; Amanda Anderson; Sarah A Reisinger; Kaila J Norton; Joni Jensen; Lori Strayer; Laura Dick; Mei-Kuen Tang; Menglan Chen; Steven G Carmella; Stephen S Hecht; Sharon E Murphy; Jing Yang; Irina Stepanov; Richard J O'Connor; Peter G Shields; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 8.  Cigarette Filter Ventilation and its Relationship to Increasing Rates of Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Min-Ae Song; Neal L Benowitz; Micah Berman; Theodore M Brasky; K Michael Cummings; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Catalin Marian; Richard O'Connor; Vaughan W Rees; Casper Woroszylo; Peter G Shields
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  Methods used in internal industry clinical trials to assess tobacco risk reduction.

Authors:  Vaughan W Rees; Jennifer M Kreslake; Richard J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Mark Parascandola; Dorothy Hatsukami; Peter G Shields; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Abuse liability assessment of tobacco products including potential reduced exposure products.

Authors:  Lawrence P Carter; Maxine L Stitzer; Jack E Henningfield; Rich J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.