Literature DB >> 19958249

Titanium versus autograft ossiculoplasty.

Jim C W Fong1, Philip Michael, Vivek Raut.   

Abstract

CONCLUSION: In this comparative series, hearing results were superior with titanium compared with autograft ossiculoplasty in the absence of a stapes superstructure. However, in the presence of a stapes superstructure, titanium ossiculoplasties gave superior results to autografts only when comparing an air-bone gap of < 10 dB.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the hearing outcomes of autograft versus titanium ossiculoplasty at 1 year.
METHODS: Two consecutive groups of patients with chronic suppurative otitis media with and without cholesteatoma suitable for ossiculoplasty, either primarily or as a staged procedure, were recruited for the study. A total of 52 consecutive patients who underwent an autograft ossiculoplasty were compared with 51 consecutive patients who underwent a titanium ossiculoplasty. Hearing results were statistically compared at 1 year between the two groups using the four frequency average (FFA) of 0.5/1/2/4 kHz and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) four frequency average of 0.5/1/2/3 kHz. The results were analysed statistically.
RESULTS: A statistically significant number of titanium TORP ossiculoplasties achieved an air-bone gap closure to within < 20 dB compared with the autograft equivalent group (p = 0.039 FFA; p = 0.016 AAO-HNS). The number of titanium PORP ossiculoplasties achieving an air-bone gap closure to within < 10 dB compared with the autograft equivalent group was also statistically significant (p = 0.006 FFA; p = 0.002 AAO-HNS).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19958249     DOI: 10.3109/00016480903338131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  7 in total

1.  Hearing outcome after sequential cholesteatoma surgery.

Authors:  Susen Lailach; Thomas Zahnert; Nikoloz Lasurashvili; Max Kemper; Thomas Beleites; Marcus Neudert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  PORP vs. TORP: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huiqian Yu; Yingzi He; Yusu Ni; Yunfeng Wang; Na Lu; Huawei Li
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Titanium prosthesis or autologous incus for total ossicular reconstruction in the absence of the stapes suprastructure and presence of mobile footplate.

Authors:  Abdulmajeed Zakzouk; Nicolas Bonmardion; Pierre Bouchetemble; Yannick Lerosey; Jean-Paul Marie
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Incus Autograft Partial Ossicular Reconstruction Prosthesis vs. Titanium Angular Clip Prosthesis in Patients with Incudostapedial Joint Erosion Caused by Chronic Otitis Media; A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Hamed Emami; Fatemeh Shojasefat; Atieh Moghtadaie; Seyed Amir Miratashi Yazdi; Mehrdad Jafari
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-05-09

5.  Short-term hearing results using ossicular replacement prostheses of hydroxyapatite versus titanium.

Authors:  Jong-Ik Lee; Shin-Hyuk Yoo; Chang Wook Lee; Chan Il Song; Myung Hoon Yoo; Hong Ju Park
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Outcome of Incus Interposition after Preservation in Soft Tissue.

Authors:  Mohammad Faramarzi; Sareh Roosta; Mahboobe Dianat
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03

Review 7.  Success rates in restoring hearing loss in patients with chronic otitis media: A systematic review.

Authors:  Aaran Lewis; Barbara Vanaelst; Håkan Hua; Byung Yoon Choi; Rafael Jaramillo; Kelvin Kong; Jaydip Ray; Alok Thakar; Krister Järbrink; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-05-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.