Literature DB >> 25086865

Titanium prosthesis or autologous incus for total ossicular reconstruction in the absence of the stapes suprastructure and presence of mobile footplate.

Abdulmajeed Zakzouk1, Nicolas Bonmardion, Pierre Bouchetemble, Yannick Lerosey, Jean-Paul Marie.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the hearing results after total ossicular replacement with a titanium prosthesis or autologous incus in the absence of stapes suprastructure and presence of mobile footplate as a retrospective medical record review in a tertiary referral center setting. There were 49 patients who had total ossicular reconstruction (titanium prosthesis, 40 patients; autologous incus, 9 patients). Medical records were reviewed after total ossicular replacement. Air-bone gap at 1 and 2 years after surgery were determined with the 4-frequency average (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 4-frequency average (0.5, 1, 2, and 3 kHz). The number of patients who had air-bone gap <20 dB was determined. For comparisons that were based on American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 4-frequency average, mean air-bone gap at 2 years after surgery was significantly smaller for the titanium prosthesis (21 dB) than autologous incus group (31 dB; P ≤ 0.03); the frequency of patients who had air-bone gap <20 dB at 1 or 2 years after surgery was significantly greater for the titanium prosthesis (1 year, 40%; 2 years, 56%) than autologous incus group [1 year, 0% (P ≤ 0.03); 2 years, 0% (P ≤ 0.04)]. Titanium prosthesis ossiculoplasty gave better results than autologous incus in the absence of the stapes suprastructure and presence of a mobile footplate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25086865     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3212-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  13 in total

1.  Extrusion rates and hearing results in ossicular reconstruction.

Authors:  J W House; K B Teufert
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Results with titanium ossicular reconstruction prostheses.

Authors:  Edward K Gardner; C Gary Jackson; David M Kaylie
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Is it valid to calculate the 3-kilohertz threshold by averaging 2 and 4 kilohertz?

Authors:  Richard K Gurgel; Gerald R Popelka; John S Oghalai; Nikolas H Blevins; Kay W Chang; Robert K Jackler
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Titanium versus nontitanium ossicular prostheses-a randomized controlled study of the medium-term outcome.

Authors:  Matthew Yung; Philip Smith
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Titanium versus autograft ossiculoplasty.

Authors:  Jim C W Fong; Philip Michael; Vivek Raut
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.494

6.  [Ossicular reconstruction with autograft in type III].

Authors:  A Desaulty; S Shahsavari; X Pasquesoone
Journal:  Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord)       Date:  2005

7.  Early results with titanium ossicular implants.

Authors:  Steven Y Ho; Robert A Battista; Richard J Wiet
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Ossiculoplasty with presculpted banked cartilage.

Authors:  R A Chole
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.346

9.  Type III tympanoplasty with titanium total ossicular replacement prosthesis: anatomic and functional results.

Authors:  Rodrigo Iñiguez-Cuadra; Isam Alobid; Antonio Borés-Domenech; Luis-Miguel Menéndez-Colino; Miguel Caballero-Borrego; Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Titanium as an ossicular replacement material: results after 336 days of implantation in the rabbit.

Authors:  K Schwager
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1998-09
View more
  3 in total

1.  The effects of surgery type and different ossiculoplasty materials on the hearing results in cholesteatoma surgery.

Authors:  Sultan Şevik Eliçora; Duygu Erdem; Aykut Erdem Dinç; Murat Damar; Sultan Bişkin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Incus Autograft Partial Ossicular Reconstruction Prosthesis vs. Titanium Angular Clip Prosthesis in Patients with Incudostapedial Joint Erosion Caused by Chronic Otitis Media; A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Hamed Emami; Fatemeh Shojasefat; Atieh Moghtadaie; Seyed Amir Miratashi Yazdi; Mehrdad Jafari
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-05-09

3.  Anatomical and functional results of ossiculoplasty using titanium prosthesis.

Authors:  G Lahlou; G Sonji; D De Seta; I Mosnier; F Y Russo; O Sterkers; D Bernardeschi
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.124

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.