Literature DB >> 25193550

Short-term hearing results using ossicular replacement prostheses of hydroxyapatite versus titanium.

Jong-Ik Lee1, Shin-Hyuk Yoo, Chang Wook Lee, Chan Il Song, Myung Hoon Yoo, Hong Ju Park.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the short-term audiologic results of the ossiculoplasty using partial or total ossicular replacement prostheses (PORP or TORP) made of hydroxyapatite (HA) and titanium (Ti). Fifty-two consecutive patients who underwent ossiculoplasty due to chronic otitis media with or without cholesteatoma were enrolled. Patients were assessed at 6 months postoperatively to establish short-term audiologic results. Preoperative and postoperative air-conduction and bone-conduction thresholds were measured at five frequencies: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 kHz. Postoperative air-bone gap (ABG) of less than 20 dB was considered as successful. Success rates for HA PORP versus Ti PORP and HA TORP versus Ti TORP were compared. Postoperative ABGs at each frequency according to the types of prostheses were also compared. All types of prostheses showed a significant decrease of ABG postoperatively. Regarding PORP, the success rate of postoperative ABG of less than 20 dB was non-significantly higher in Ti group (89%) than in HA group (72%). Regarding TORP, HA group showed non-significantly higher success rate (100%) than Ti group (67%). Comparing postoperative ABGs at each frequency, there was no significant difference in ABGs between HA and Ti groups. There was no difference between the two materials. Both HA and Ti gave good functional results and operator can choose any types of prostheses by personal preference and affordability. Further randomized controlled long-term trials with large sample sizes are needed to establish the difference exactly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25193550     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3274-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  13 in total

1.  Standardized measurements of the sound transmission of middle ear implants using a mechanical middle ear model.

Authors:  H Meister; M Walger; A Mickenhagen; H von Wedel; E Stennert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Titanium versus nontitanium ossicular prostheses-a randomized controlled study of the medium-term outcome.

Authors:  Matthew Yung; Philip Smith
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 3.  Ossiculoplasty.

Authors:  Luv Ram Javia; Michael J Ruckenstein
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Ossicular chain reconstruction using titanium versus hydroxyapatite implants.

Authors:  Yuri M Gelfand; C Y Joseph Chang
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Titanium versus autograft ossiculoplasty.

Authors:  Jim C W Fong; Philip Michael; Vivek Raut
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.494

6.  Use of sintered hydroxylapatite in middle ear surgery.

Authors:  J J Grote; W Kuypers; K de Groot
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.538

7.  [Three years of experience with titanium implants in the middle ear].

Authors:  C H Stupp; C Dalchow; D Grün; H F Stupp; J Wustrow
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.057

8.  Titanium vs hydroxyapatite ossiculoplasty in canal wall down mastoidectomy.

Authors:  Luca O Redaelli de Zinis
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-12

9.  Titanium versus nontitanium prostheses in ossiculoplasty.

Authors:  Charles S Coffey; Fu-Shing Lee; Paul R Lambert
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Hydroxyapatite versus titanium ossiculoplasty.

Authors:  Eric Truy; Anna Nuca Naiman; Clemence Pavillon; Darius Abedipour; Geneviève Lina-Granade; Muriel Rabilloud
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  4 in total

1.  The effects of surgery type and different ossiculoplasty materials on the hearing results in cholesteatoma surgery.

Authors:  Sultan Şevik Eliçora; Duygu Erdem; Aykut Erdem Dinç; Murat Damar; Sultan Bişkin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Cartilage island on stapes: autologous PORP in the hypoventilated middle ear.

Authors:  Jeanette Hess-Erga; Bart Lambertus Henricus Jozef Engelen; Flemming Slinning Vassbotn
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Functional Outcomes of Single-Stage Ossiculoplasty in Chronic Otitis Media With or Without Cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Seongbin Park; Kang Hyeon Lim; Sung Jin Lim; Dong Heun Park; Yoon Chan Rah; June Choi
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  Comparison of Hydroxyapatite Prosthesis and Incus Interposition in Incus Defects.

Authors:  Suphi Bulğurcu; Bünyamin Dikilitaş; İbrahim Çukurova
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-06-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.