Literature DB >> 35070929

Incus Autograft Partial Ossicular Reconstruction Prosthesis vs. Titanium Angular Clip Prosthesis in Patients with Incudostapedial Joint Erosion Caused by Chronic Otitis Media; A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Hamed Emami1, Fatemeh Shojasefat2, Atieh Moghtadaie3, Seyed Amir Miratashi Yazdi4, Mehrdad Jafari1,5.   

Abstract

Chronic otitis media (COM) is a common disease that can cause damage to the middle ear ossicles and thus lead to conductive hearing loss. The purpose of this study was to compare two methods of incus partial ossicular reconstruction prosthesis (PORP) and reconstruction with titanium angular clip prosthesis in patients with incudostapedial joint erosion. In this interventional randomized clinical trial carried out in a tertiary referral hospital, patients with chronic otitis media and incudostapedial joint erosion who were candidates for surgery, were randomly allocated into two groups of incus PORP surgery and reconstruction with a titanium angular clip prosthesis. Audiometry was performed for the patients prior to and six months after surgery. Pre- and post-operative air-bone gap (ABG) and bone conduction (BC) thresholds were calculated and means were compared by analysis of variances (ANOVA). A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The study consisted of 24 and 14 subjects in the incus PORP and angular clip groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the mean pre- and post-operative ABG, BC thresholds and ABG reduction in the compared groups. Considering issues such as high cost and inaccessibility of titanium angular clips in all centers, incus PORP may be a more acceptable method. © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic otitis media; Incus PORP; Titanium angular clip prosthesis

Year:  2021        PMID: 35070929      PMCID: PMC8743330          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-021-02605-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  6 in total

1.  Ossicular reconstruction: incus versus universal titanium prosthesis.

Authors:  Owen Woods; Fouad El Fata; Issam Saliba
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 1.863

2.  Management of incus long process defects: incus interposition versus incudostapedial rebridging with bone cement.

Authors:  F Celenk; T Baglam; E Baysal; C Durucu; Z A Karatas; S Mumbuc; M Kanlikama
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 1.469

3.  [Comparative results of type II ossiculoplasty: incus transposition versus titanium PORP (Kurz)].

Authors:  S B Ceccato; R Maunsell; G Celis Morata; D Portmann
Journal:  Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord)       Date:  2005

4.  Titanium versus autograft ossiculoplasty.

Authors:  Jim C W Fong; Philip Michael; Vivek Raut
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. AmericanAcademy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Ffoundation, Inc.

Authors: 
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Titanium prosthesis or autologous incus for total ossicular reconstruction in the absence of the stapes suprastructure and presence of mobile footplate.

Authors:  Abdulmajeed Zakzouk; Nicolas Bonmardion; Pierre Bouchetemble; Yannick Lerosey; Jean-Paul Marie
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 2.503

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.