Literature DB >> 16641998

Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds.

Timothy Q Gentner1, Kimberly M Fenn, Daniel Margoliash, Howard C Nusbaum.   

Abstract

Humans regularly produce new utterances that are understood by other members of the same language community. Linguistic theories account for this ability through the use of syntactic rules (or generative grammars) that describe the acceptable structure of utterances. The recursive, hierarchical embedding of language units (for example, words or phrases within shorter sentences) that is part of the ability to construct new utterances minimally requires a 'context-free' grammar that is more complex than the 'finite-state' grammars thought sufficient to specify the structure of all non-human communication signals. Recent hypotheses make the central claim that the capacity for syntactic recursion forms the computational core of a uniquely human language faculty. Here we show that European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) accurately recognize acoustic patterns defined by a recursive, self-embedding, context-free grammar. They are also able to classify new patterns defined by the grammar and reliably exclude agrammatical patterns. Thus, the capacity to classify sequences from recursive, centre-embedded grammars is not uniquely human. This finding opens a new range of complex syntactic processing mechanisms to physiological investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16641998      PMCID: PMC2653278          DOI: 10.1038/nature04675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  10 in total

1.  Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate.

Authors:  W Tecumseh Fitch; Marc D Hauser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-01-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?

Authors:  Marc D Hauser; Noam Chomsky; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Neuronal populations and single cells representing learned auditory objects.

Authors:  Timothy Q Gentner; Daniel Margoliash
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The origin of speech.

Authors:  C F HOCKETT
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1960-09       Impact factor: 2.142

5.  The evolution of the language faculty: clarifications and implications.

Authors:  W Tecumseh Fitch; Marc D Hauser; Noam Chomsky
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-08-19

6.  Perceptual classification based on the component structure of song in European starlings.

Authors:  T Q Gentner; S H Hulse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Segmentation of the speech stream in a non-human primate: statistical learning in cotton-top tamarins.

Authors:  M D Hauser; E L Newport; R N Aslin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-03

8.  The faculty of language: what's special about it?

Authors:  Steven Pinker; Ray Jackendoff
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-03

9.  Rule learning by cotton-top tamarins.

Authors:  Marc D Hauser; Daniel Weiss; Gary Marcus
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-11

10.  Perceptual mechanisms for individual vocal recognition in European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.844

  10 in total
  135 in total

1.  Vocal tract articulation revisited: the case of the monk parakeet.

Authors:  Verena R Ohms; Gabriël J L Beckers; Carel ten Cate; Roderick A Suthers
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Pattern perception and computational complexity: introduction to the special issue.

Authors:  W Tecumseh Fitch; Angela D Friederici; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Revisiting the syntactic abilities of non-human animals: natural vocalizations and artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Carel ten Cate; Kazuo Okanoya
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  The neurobiology of syntax: beyond string sets.

Authors:  Karl Magnus Petersson; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  How semantic biases in simple adjacencies affect learning a complex structure with non-adjacencies in AGL: a statistical account.

Authors:  Fenna H Poletiek; Jun Lai
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  The redundancy of recursion and infinity for natural language.

Authors:  Erkki Luuk; Hendrik Luuk
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-07-23

7.  Simple stimuli, simple strategies.

Authors:  Timothy Q Gentner; Kimberly Fenn; Daniel Margoliash; Howard Nusbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Birds of a feather flock--and sing--together.

Authors:  Dustin M Graham
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 12.625

9.  Temporal and rate code analysis of responses to low-frequency components in the bird's own song by song system neurons.

Authors:  Makoto Fukushima; Peter L Rauske; Daniel Margoliash
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 10.  Human and animal cognition: continuity and discontinuity.

Authors:  David Premack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.