Literature DB >> 25386571

Medial Unicompartmental Osteoarthritis (MUO) of the Knee: Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) or Total Knee Replacement (TKR).

E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan1.   

Abstract

The aim of this review article is to analyze the clinical effectiveness of total knee replacement (TKR) compared to unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) in patients with medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis (MUO) in terms of survival rates, revision rates and postoperative complications. The search engine was MedLine. The keywords used were: medial knee osteoarthritis. Three thousand and ninety-six articles were found on 28 April 2014. Of those, only twenty-eight were selected and reviewed because they were strictly focused on the topic of this article. Compared with those who have TKR, patients who undergo UKR have higher revision rates and lower survival rates at 5, 10 and 15 years. The reported overall risk of postoperative complications for patients undergoing TKR is 11%, compared with 4.3% for patients undergoing UKR. In conclusion, UKR have higher revision rates and lower survival rates than TKR. There is, however, an increased risk of postoperative complications after TKR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparative results; Knee; Medial osteoarthritis; TKR; UKR

Year:  2014        PMID: 25386571      PMCID: PMC4225015     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  27 in total

1.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties implanted for osteoarthritis with partial loss of joint space have high re-operation rates.

Authors:  Tuukka T Niinimäki; David W Murray; Juha Partanen; Ari Pajala; Juhana I Leppilahti
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leading to revision.

Authors:  Thomas J Aleto; Michael E Berend; Merrill A Ritter; Philip M Faris; R Michael Meneghini
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Total knee arthroplasty has higher postoperative morbidity than unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas M Brown; Neil P Sheth; Kenneth Davis; Mike E Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Up to 10-year follow-up of the Oxford medial partial knee arthroplasty--695 cases from a single institution.

Authors:  Per W Kristensen; Henriette A Holm; Claus Varnum
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  No long-term difference between fixed and mobile medial unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sebastien Parratte; Vanessa Pauly; Jean-Manuel Aubaniac; Jean-Noel A Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Medial mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early survivorship and analysis of failures in 1000 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Adam G Bergeson; Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Jason M Hurst; Michael J Morris; Michael A Sneller
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup.

Authors:  R A Berger; D D Nedeff; R M Barden; M M Sheinkop; J J Jacobs; A G Rosenberg; J O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Comparison of HRQL between unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Katie Sweeney; Maja Grubisic; Carlo A Marra; Richard Kendall; Linda C Li; Larry D Lynd
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty?: Results from a matched study.

Authors:  Anish K Amin; James T Patton; Robert E Cook; Mark Gaston; Ivan J Brenkel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: factors influencing the outcome.

Authors:  Zhiqing Xing; Jonathan Katz; William Jiranek
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 2.757

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Larger range of motion and increased return to activity, but higher revision rates following unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in patients under 65: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura J Kleeblad; Jelle P van der List; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Risk of Revision and Adverse Outcomes Following Partial Knee Replacement and High Tibial Osteotomy for Unicompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Authors:  Sun-Ho Lee; Hae-Rim Kim; Eun-Kyoo Song; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 1.033

3.  Robotic arm-assisted vs conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of the effects on clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Fengjun Zhang; Hongcai Li; Zhaochen Ba; Chunguang Bo; Kai Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Role of High Tibial Osteotomy in Cartilage Regeneration - Is Correction of Malalignment Mandatory for Success?

Authors:  Matthew Dhanaraj Thambiah; Melvin K L Tan; James H P Hui
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.251

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.