Literature DB >> 22729505

The acute effect of running on knee articular cartilage and meniscus magnetic resonance relaxation times in young healthy adults.

Karupppasamy Subburaj1, Deepak Kumar, Richard B Souza, Hamza Alizai, Xiaojuan Li, Thomas M Link, Sharmila Majumdar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding the acute response of healthy knee cartilage to running may provide valuable insight into functional properties. In recent years, quantitative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging techniques (T1(ρ) and T2 relaxation measurement) have shown tremendous potential and unique ability to noninvasively and quantitatively determine cartilage response to physiologic levels of loading occurring with physiologic levels of exercise.
PURPOSE: To measure the short-term changes in MR T1(ρ) and T2 relaxation times of knee articular cartilage and meniscus in healthy individuals immediately after 30 minutes of running. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study.
METHODS: Twenty young healthy volunteers, aged 22 to 35 years, underwent 3T MR imaging of the knee before and immediately after 30 minutes of running. Quantitative assessment of the cartilage and menisci was performed using MR images with a T1(ρ) and T2 mapping technique. After adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index, repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to determine the effects of running on MR relaxation times.
RESULTS: The post-run T1(ρ) and T2 measurement showed significant reduction in all regions of cartilage except the lateral tibia when compared with the pre-run condition. The medial tibiofemoral (T1(ρ): 9.4%, P < .0001; T2: 5.4%, P = .0049) and patellofemoral (T1(ρ): 12.5%, P < .0001; T2: 5.7%, P = .0007) compartments experienced the greatest reduction after running. The superficial layer of the articular cartilage showed significantly higher change in relaxation times than the deep layer (T1(ρ): 9.6% vs 8.2%, P = .050; T2: 6.0% vs 3.5%, P = .069). The anterior and posterior horns of the medial meniscus (9.7%, P = .016 and 11.4%, P = .001) were the only meniscal subregions with significant changes in T1(ρ) after running.
CONCLUSION: Shorter T1(ρ) and T2 values after running suggest alteration in the water content and collagen fiber orientation of the articular cartilage. Greater changes in relaxation times of the medial compartment and patellofemoral joint cartilage indicate greater load sharing by these areas during running.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22729505      PMCID: PMC3660554          DOI: 10.1177/0363546512449816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  35 in total

1.  Detection of changes in cartilage water content using MRI T2-mapping in vivo.

Authors:  C Liess; S Lüsse; N Karger; M Heller; C-C Glüer
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Effects of compression and recovery on bovine articular cartilage: appearance on MR images.

Authors:  J D Rubenstein; J K Kim; R M Henkelman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Depth-dependent confined compression modulus of full-thickness bovine articular cartilage.

Authors:  R M Schinagl; D Gurskis; A C Chen; R L Sah
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Transcriptome-wide gene regulation by gentle treadmill walking during the progression of monoiodoacetate-induced arthritis.

Authors:  Jin Nam; Priyangi Perera; Jie Liu; Lai Chu Wu; Björn Rath; Timothy A Butterfield; Sudha Agarwal
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2011-06

5.  Change in knee cartilage T2 at MR imaging after running: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Timothy J Mosher; Harvey E Smith; Christopher Collins; Yi Liu; Jason Hancy; Bernard J Dardzinski; Michael B Smith
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Reviewing knee osteoarthritis--a biomechanical perspective.

Authors:  B D Jackson; A E Wluka; A J Teichtahl; M E Morris; F M Cicuttini
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.319

Review 7.  Cartilage MRI T2 relaxation time mapping: overview and applications.

Authors:  Timothy J Mosher; Bernard J Dardzinski
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  In vivo cartilage deformation after different types of activity and its dependence on physical training status.

Authors:  F Eckstein; B Lemberger; C Gratzke; M Hudelmaier; C Glaser; K-H Englmeier; M Reiser
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Deformation of articular cartilage collagen structure under static and cyclic loading.

Authors:  M J Kääb; K Ito; J M Clark; H P Nötzli
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Quantification of T(2) relaxation changes in articular cartilage with in situ mechanical loading of the knee.

Authors:  David Nag; Gary P Liney; Paul Gillespie; Kevin P Sherman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  41 in total

1.  Abnormal Joint Loading During Gait in Persons With Hip Osteoarthritis Is Associated With Symptoms and Cartilage Lesions.

Authors:  Tzu-Chieh Liao; Michael A Samaan; Tijana Popovic; Jan Neumann; Alan L Zhang; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar; Richard B Souza
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 4.751

2.  Quadriceps and hamstrings morphology is related to walking mechanics and knee cartilage MRI relaxation times in young adults.

Authors:  Deepak Kumar; Karupppasamy Subburaj; Wilson Lin; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Charles E McCulloch; Xiaojuan Li; Thomas M Link; Richard B Souza; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  A new technique to evaluate the impact of running on knee cartilage deformation by region.

Authors:  Elora C Brenneman Wilson; Anthony A Gatti; Monica R Maly
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Imaging and T2 relaxometry of short-T2 connective tissues in the knee using ultrashort echo-time double-echo steady-state (UTEDESS).

Authors:  Akshay S Chaudhari; Bragi Sveinsson; Catherine J Moran; Emily J McWalter; Ethan M Johnson; Tao Zhang; Garry E Gold; Brian A Hargreaves
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Chemical exchange saturation transfer MR imaging of articular cartilage glycosaminoglycans at 3 T: Accuracy of B0 Field Inhomogeneity corrections with gradient echo method.

Authors:  Wenbo Wei; Guang Jia; David Flanigan; Jinyuan Zhou; Michael V Knopp
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 6.  Quantitative MRI of articular cartilage and its clinical applications.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Li; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Multicomponent T2 analysis of articular cartilage with synovial fluid partial volume correction.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Rajeev Chaudhary; Walter F Block; Alexey Samsonov; Richard Kijowski
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Local associations between knee cartilage T and T2 relaxation times and patellofemoral joint stress during walking: A voxel-based relaxometry analysis.

Authors:  Hsiang-Ling Teng; Valentina Pedoia; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar; Richard B Souza
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Activities of daily living influence tibial cartilage T1rho relaxation times.

Authors:  Kevin A Taylor; Amber T Collins; Lauren N Heckelman; Sophia Y Kim; Gangadhar M Utturkar; Charles E Spritzer; William E Garrett; Louis E DeFrate
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 10.  Quantitative radiologic imaging techniques for articular cartilage composition: toward early diagnosis and development of disease-modifying therapeutics for osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Edwin H G Oei; Jasper van Tiel; William H Robinson; Garry E Gold
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.794

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.