Literature DB >> 22161783

Association of MR relaxation and cartilage deformation in knee osteoarthritis.

K Subburaj1, R B Souza, C Stehling, B T Wyman, M-P Le Graverand-Gastineau, T M Link, X Li, S Majumdar.   

Abstract

We assessed the relationship between cartilage MR relaxation times and biomechanical response of tibiofemoral articular cartilage to physiological loading in healthy subjects and patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Female subjects above 40 years of age with (N(1)  = 20) and without (N(2)  = 10) OA were imaged on a 3T MR scanner using a custom made loading device. MR images were acquired with the knee flexed at 20° with and without a compressive load of 50% of the subject's bodyweight. The subjects were categorized based on the clinical MRI scoring of medial and lateral cartilage surfaces. Data were stratified twice into two equal groups (low and high) at the median value of T(1ρ) and T(2) relaxation time. The change in contact area and cartilage deformation was measured within these groups. Paired Student's t-test (α = 0.05) was used to analyze the effect of loading on contact area and deformation. The average area of the contact region in the medial compartment was significantly higher in OA subjects compared with normal subjects in both unloaded (314 ± 112 mm(2) vs. 227 ± 106 mm(2), p = 0.023) and loaded (425 ± 128 mm(2) vs. 316 ± 107 mm(2), p = 0.01) conditions. The overall relative change of cartilage thickness in the medial compartment was significantly higher than the lateral compartment (-5.3 ± 9.9% vs. -1.9 ± 9.2%, p = 0.042). When cartilage was divided into deep and superficial layers, superficial layers showed higher changes in relaxation time (T(1ρ) and T(2)) than the changes in relaxation time of whole cartilage (Normal: 12.5% vs. 6.9%; OA: 10.9% vs. 4.6%). The average T(1ρ) and T(2) times, change in area of contact region, and change in cartilage thickness in subjects with OA were higher when compared to normal subjects. This study provides support for a relationship between the mechanical response of cartilage to physiological loading (cartilage-on-cartilage contact area and cartilage deformation) and MR relaxation times (T(1ρ) and T(2)) in both OA patients and normal subjects.
Copyright © 2011 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22161783      PMCID: PMC3652010          DOI: 10.1002/jor.22031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  24 in total

Review 1.  The effects of exercise on human articular cartilage.

Authors:  F Eckstein; M Hudelmaier; R Putz
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Pathomechanisms of cartilage destruction by mechanical injury.

Authors:  Bodo Kurz; Angelika K Lemke; Jakob Fay; Thomas Pufe; Alan J Grodzinsky; Michael Schünke
Journal:  Ann Anat       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Biomechanical changes at the hip, knee, and ankle joints during gait are associated with knee osteoarthritis severity.

Authors:  Janie L Astephen; Kevin J Deluzio; Graham E Caldwell; Michael J Dunbar
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  In vivo T(1rho) mapping in cartilage using 3D magnetization-prepared angle-modulated partitioned k-space spoiled gradient echo snapshots (3D MAPSS).

Authors:  Xiaojuan Li; Eric T Han; Reed F Busse; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  In vivo T(1rho) and T(2) mapping of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee using 3 T MRI.

Authors:  X Li; C Benjamin Ma; T M Link; D-D Castillo; G Blumenkrantz; J Lozano; J Carballido-Gamio; M Ries; S Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  In vivo cartilage deformation after different types of activity and its dependence on physical training status.

Authors:  F Eckstein; B Lemberger; C Gratzke; M Hudelmaier; C Glaser; K-H Englmeier; M Reiser
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Gait mechanics influence healthy cartilage morphology and osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Thomas P Andriacchi; Seungbum Koo; Sean F Scanlan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Inter-subject comparison of MRI knee cartilage thickness.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Jan S Bauer; Robert Stahl; Keh-Yang Lee; Stefanie Krause; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 8.545

9.  Prediction of biomechanical properties of articular cartilage with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Miika T Nieminen; Juha Töyräs; Mikko S Laasanen; Johanna Silvennoinen; Heikki J Helminen; Jukka S Jurvelin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  In vivo cartilage contact deformation in the healthy human tibiofemoral joint.

Authors:  J T Bingham; R Papannagari; S K Van de Velde; C Gross; T J Gill; D T Felson; H E Rubash; G Li
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 7.580

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Impact of physical activity and mechanical loading on biomarkers typically used in osteoarthritis assessment: current concepts and knowledge gaps.

Authors:  Nicole M Cattano; Jeffrey B Driban; Kenneth L Cameron; Michael R Sitler
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 5.346

2.  Quantitative OCT and MRI biomarkers for the differentiation of cartilage degeneration.

Authors:  Sven Nebelung; Nicolai Brill; Markus Tingart; Thomas Pufe; Christiane Kuhl; Holger Jahr; Daniel Truhn
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Response of knee cartilage T1rho and T2 relaxation times to in vivo mechanical loading in individuals with and without knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  R B Souza; D Kumar; N Calixto; J Singh; J Schooler; K Subburaj; X Li; T M Link; S Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Comparison of intervertebral disc displacements measured under applied loading with MRI at 3.0 T and 9.4 T.

Authors:  Deva D Chan; Paull C Gossett; Kent D Butz; Eric A Nauman; Corey P Neu
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Regional variations in MR relaxation of hip joint cartilage in subjects with and without femoralacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Karupppasamy Subburaj; Alexander Valentinitsch; Alexander B Dillon; Gabby B Joseph; Xiaojuan Li; Thomas M Link; Thomas P Vail; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Biochemical Response to a Moderate Running Bout in Participants With or Without a History of Acute Knee Injury.

Authors:  Nicole M Cattano; Jeffrey B Driban; Mary F Barbe; Ryan T Tierney; Mamta Amin; Michael R Sitler
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Quantitative assessment of morphology, T, and T2 of shoulder cartilage using MRI.

Authors:  Lorenzo Nardo; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Solomon Tang; Andrew Lai; Roland Krug
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Changes in MR relaxation times of the meniscus with acute loading: an in vivo pilot study in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Karupppasamy Subburaj; Richard B Souza; Bradley T Wyman; Marie-Pierre Hellio Le Graverand-Gastineau; Xiaojuan Li; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of knee joint under mechanical loading: Review.

Authors:  Saeed Jerban; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  In vivo articular cartilage deformation: noninvasive quantification of intratissue strain during joint contact in the human knee.

Authors:  Deva D Chan; Luyao Cai; Kent D Butz; Stephen B Trippel; Eric A Nauman; Corey P Neu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.