Literature DB >> 19946667

The association between component malalignment and post-operative pain following navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty: results of a cohort/nested case-control study.

Thomas Czurda1, Peter Fennema, Martin Baumgartner, Peter Ritschl.   

Abstract

Previous studies have noted an adverse relationship between implant malalignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and post-operative pain. Although some evidence exists indicating that computer-assisted surgical navigation for TKA can improve the accuracy of component alignment, its impact on clinical outcomes is currently unknown. The dual goals of the present cohort/nested case-control study were to (1) compare self-reported responses to the Western Ontario-McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire between computer-assisted TKA (123 patients) using the imageless PiGalileo navigation system and conventional TKA (207 patients) [cohort analysis], and (2) to investigate a potential association between malalignment and post-operative pain in 19 painful knees and 19 asymptomatic knees obtained from the cohort analysis using matched sampling [nested case-control study]. In the cohort analysis, a relevant but non-significant (P = 0.06) difference in the occurrence of chronic pain was observed between the navigated (12%) and conventional arms (20%). Median post-operative WOMAC pain score was 100 (range, 50-100) in the conventional group and 100 (range, 65-100) in the navigated group. However, the Mann-Whitney test revealed a significant difference in favor of the navigated group (P = 0.01). In the nested case-control analysis, radiological outcomes and computer tomography (CT) measurements of femoral rotation were compared between the groups. The CT rotation measurements yielded evidence of a relationship between post-operative pain and incorrect rotational alignment of the femoral component of more than 3 degrees (OR: 7; 95% CI: 1.2-42; P = .033). In conclusion, there was no clinical benefit to computer-assisted navigation; however, a statistically significant relationship was observed between incorrect rotational alignment of the femoral component and symptoms of post-operative pain following TKA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19946667     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-009-0990-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  26 in total

1.  Osteointegration and implant position after cementless total knee replacement.

Authors:  Reinhard Fuiko; Alexander Zembsch; Michel Loyoddin; Peter Ritschl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial.

Authors:  S K Chauhan; R G Scott; W Breidahl; R J Beaver
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

3.  Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique.

Authors:  Pak Lin Chin; Kuang Ying Yang; Seng Jin Yeo; Ngai Nung Lo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Computer-assisted surgery: a wine before its time: in the affirmative.

Authors:  John J Callaghan; Steve S Liu; Lucian C Warth
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus the conventional technique: how precise is navigation in clinical routine?

Authors:  Markus Tingart; Christian Lüring; Holger Bäthis; Johannes Beckmann; Joachim Grifka; Lars Perlick
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai Bauwens; Gerrit Matthes; Michael Wich; Florian Gebhard; Beate Hanson; Axel Ekkernkamp; Dirk Stengel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R L Barrack; T Schrader; A J Bertot; M W Wolfe; L Myers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J R Moreland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement.

Authors:  P A Lotke; M L Ecker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  [Rotational malalignment of the components may cause chronic pain or early failure in total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  S Hofmann; J Romero; E Roth-Schiffl; T Albrecht
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.087

View more
  27 in total

1.  Centre of the posterior cruciate ligament and the sulcus between tubercle spines are reliable landmarks for tibial component placement.

Authors:  Namık Sahin; Teoman Atıcı; Ünal Kurtoğlu; Ali Turgut; Güven Ozkaya; Yüksel Ozkan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Novel computer-assisted method for revision arthroplasty of the knee.

Authors:  Hanns-Edgar Hoffart; Harald Dinges; Stefan Kolbeck; Peter Ritschl; Hagen Hommel
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-18

3.  Computer-assisted surgery improves rotational positioning of the femoral component but not the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero; Alfonso Noriega-Fernandez; Jose Manuel Fernandez-Carreira; Jose Manuel Fernandez-Simon; Jimena Llorens de los Rios
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Song Zhao; Xiaochun Peng; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Total knee arthroplasty--what do we know and what don't.

Authors:  R Becker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review.

Authors:  R Stephen J Burnett; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Improved accuracy in computer-assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrick Weber; Alexander Crispin; Florian Schmidutz; Sandra Utzschneider; Matthias F Pietschmann; Volkmar Jansson; Peter E Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  No difference in accuracy between pinless and conventional computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  C Baier; G Maderbacher; H R Springorum; F Zeman; W Fitz; J Schaumburger; J Grifka; J Beckmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Handheld computer-navigated constrained total knee arthroplasty for complex extra-articular deformities.

Authors:  M Pietsch; M Hochegger; O Djahani; G Mlaker; M Eder-Halbedl; Th Hofstädter
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 10.  Current concepts and future perspectives in computer-assisted navigated total knee replacement.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Naoki Nakano; John E Lawrence; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.