Literature DB >> 19943042

Efficacy and safety of the Accordion stone-trapping device: in vitro results from an artificial ureterolithotripsy model.

Peter Jochen Olbert1, Christian Keil, Jost Weber, Andres J Schrader, Axel Hegele, Rainer Hofmann.   

Abstract

One of the challenges of intracorporeal ureterolithotripsy is undesired stone migration. Stone-trapping devices have been designed to prevent this quite common phenomenon. These devices have to be effective in terms of ureteral obstruction and safe in terms of resistance to the action of commonly used lithotriptors. This work was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the recently approved Accordion stone-trapping device in vitro. In a rigid, submerged ureteral model with two different diameters (8 and 10 mm), artificial stones were positioned in direct contact with the engaged Accordion device. A defined number of pneumatic pulses of the LithoClast master at different performance levels was applied and the migration distance of the stone was measured after each single pulse. As a control, the same series was repeated without the stone-trapping device. Secondly, the Accordion device was exposed to a previously defined number of pneumatic or Ho:YAG-laser pulses, in direct contact with the lithotripsy probe, up to a total activation time of 2 min. At different time points, the device was controlled for damage and functionality. The mean stone migration distance without the Accordion device was between 39.2 and 52.8 mm and between 37.8 and 75.4 mm in the 8 and 10 mm tubes, respectively. In comparison, the stone or fragment travelling distance with the device was in the 0-2 mm range. This difference was highly significant. Both pneumatic and laser lithotriptor did not affect the functionality of the Accordion device. The Ho:YAG laser causes small perforations of the film without affecting the devices' stability. The Accordion device appears to be highly efficient and safe in vitro. Clinical trials will have to assess its value in endourological practice. Randomised comparative trials comparing different stone-trapping devices are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19943042     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-009-0232-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  20 in total

1.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  R Peschel; G Janetschek; G Bartsch
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Avulsion of the ureter caused by stone basket manipulation.

Authors:  M Abdelsayed; E Onal; S H Wax
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  A new alternative treatment for entrapped stone basket in the distal ureter.

Authors:  A C Durano; J J Hanosh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Assessment of novel ureteral occlusion device and comparison with stone cone in prevention of stone fragment migration during lithotripsy.

Authors:  Paulette G Holley; Sameer K Sharma; Kent T Perry; Thomas M T Turk
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Operative failure during ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy: factors affecting successful outcome.

Authors:  Cengiz Miroglu; Kaya Horasanli; Orhan Tanriverdi; Bülent Altay; Eyüp Gumus
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  The stone cone: a new generation of basketry.

Authors:  S P Dretler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Pneumatic lithotripsy for large ureteral stones: is it the first line treatment?

Authors:  Lutfi Tunc; Bora Kupeli; Cagri Senocak; Turgut Alkibay; Sinan Sözen; Ustunol Karaoglan; Ibrahim Bozkirli
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Treatment of ureteric calculi--use of Holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy versus pneumatic lithoclast.

Authors:  Salman Ahmed Tipu; Hammad Afzal Malik; Nazim Mohhayuddin; Gauhar Sultan; Manzoor Hussain; Altaf Hashmi; Syed Ali Anwar Naqvi; Syed Adibul Hasan Rizvi
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.781

Review 9.  Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  R Nelson; S Edwards; B Tse
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18

10.  Comparison of holmium laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in managing upper-ureteral stones.

Authors:  Shivadeo S Bapat; Ketan V Pai; Satyajeet S Purnapatre; Pushkaraj B Yadav; Abhijit S Padye
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  4 in total

1.  Xenx (Xenolith): preliminary considerations of a new "all-in-one" ureteral guidewire and anti-repulsion device.

Authors:  Emanuele Montanari; Fabrizio Longo; Nicola Macchione; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  Preventing stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Osama M Elashry; Ahmad M Tawfik
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Use of NTrap® during Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Upper Ureteral Stones.

Authors:  Moung Jin Lee; Seung Tae Lee; Seung Ki Min
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-10-21

Review 4.  Intracorporeal laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  Athanasios G Papatsoris; Andreas Skolarikos; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-03-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.