Literature DB >> 11342924

The stone cone: a new generation of basketry.

S P Dretler1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We designed a device to minimize ureteral stone migration during intracorporeal lithotripsy, decrease the likelihood of stone and/or basket entrapment, and extract whole stones and fragments.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nitinol and stainless steel wires were configured into expandable tapered cones, which were placed cephalad to in vitro and in vivo concretions, and used to trap and extract stones as well as other test material. Safety features were evaluated by measuring the release of ball bearings and the tension needed to unwind the coils of the cone, which were greater than 4 mm. in diameter. We treated 4 patients with ureteral calculi using the Stone Conedagger to prevent migration and extract fragments.
RESULTS: The cone-shaped devices expanded to occlude the test devices and human ureters, and prevented stone migration. They extracted whole concretions and fragments greater than 1.5 mm. The cone-shaped basket released a 5.5 mm. ball bearing at an average 0.127 pounds of tension when pulled through a 5 mm. plastic orifice. Coils greater than 4 mm. in diameter were straightened at a tension of 0.10 to 0.14 pounds. Stone migration during intracorporeal lithotripsy was prevented in the 4 patients with ureteral calculi, in whom large and small fragments were safely extracted.
CONCLUSIONS: The Stone Cone may be placed via a ureteral catheter and opened cephalad to a ureteral stone to prevent stone migration during intracorporeal lithotripsy. It may extract whole stones and fragments greater than 1.5 mm. It is designed, so that its coils greater than 4 mm. in diameter release concretions too wide for the ureter or ureteral orifice after approximately 0.127 pounds of tension are applied. Because of these features, the Stone Cone represents a new generation of basketry appropriate to the era of ureteroscopy and intracorporeal lithotripsy. It is worthy of further clinical study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11342924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

1.  Xenx (Xenolith): preliminary considerations of a new "all-in-one" ureteral guidewire and anti-repulsion device.

Authors:  Emanuele Montanari; Fabrizio Longo; Nicola Macchione; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  Holmium laser for stone management.

Authors:  Sean Pierre; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Efficacy and safety of the Accordion stone-trapping device: in vitro results from an artificial ureterolithotripsy model.

Authors:  Peter Jochen Olbert; Christian Keil; Jost Weber; Andres J Schrader; Axel Hegele; Rainer Hofmann
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-11-27

4.  Dual usage of a stone basket: Stone capture and retropulsion prevention.

Authors:  Tadeusz Kroczak; Daniela Ghiculete; Robert Sowerby; Michael Ordon; Jason Y Lee; Kenneth T Pace; John R Honey
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 5.  Preventing stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Osama M Elashry; Ahmad M Tawfik
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Authors:  Mohamed Bastawisy; Tarek Gameel; Mohamed Radwan; Ahmed Ramadan; Mutie Alkathiri; Adel Omar
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-10

7.  Evaluation of pneumatic versus holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for impacted ureteral stones.

Authors:  Murat Binbay; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Avinash Singh; Tolga Akman; Erdem Tekinaslan; Omer Sarilar; Murat Baykal; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Prevention of retrograde calculus migration with the Stone Cone.

Authors:  N P Pardalidis; A G Papatsoris; E V Kosmaoglou
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2004-12-30

9.  Comparison of Stone Retrieval Basket, Stone Cone and Holmium Laser: Which One Is Better in Retropulsion and Stone-Free Status for Patients with Upper Ureteral Calculi?

Authors:  Farzad Allameh; Mohammadreza Razzaghi; Morteza Fallah-Karkan; Behnam Hosseini; Ali Tayyebi Azar; Arash Ranjbar; Amir Hossein Rahavian; Saleh Ghiasy
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-06

10.  Accessory instrumentation in flexible ureteroscopy: Evidence-based recommendation.

Authors:  Timothy Holden; Renato Nardi Pedro; Monoj Monga
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.