Literature DB >> 15798418

Assessment of novel ureteral occlusion device and comparison with stone cone in prevention of stone fragment migration during lithotripsy.

Paulette G Holley1, Sameer K Sharma, Kent T Perry, Thomas M T Turk.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present the initial ex-vivo results of a new ureteral-occlusion device (Cook Urological, Spencer, IN) for preventing the retrograde migration of particles during ureteroscopy and its comparison with the Stone Cone (Microvasive-Boston Scientific Corp., Spencer, IN).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed an ex-vivo model using a porcine kidney with an intact ureter. Standardized plastic beads were placed in the proximal ureter. Each device was deployed proximal to the beads during ureteroscopy, and the number of beads impeded by each device was recorded.
RESULTS: The new device was successful at preventing retrograde migration of beads > or = 1.5 mm. Furthermore, 1.0-mm beads were impeded by the center of the device, although they passed through the periphery. The Stone Cone blocked the retrograde migration of beads > or = 2.5 mm.
CONCLUSION: The new occlusion device was efficacious in an ex-vivo model. It appears to prevent the migration of smaller particles than are blocked by the Stone Cone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15798418     DOI: 10.1089/end.2005.19.200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  6 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of the Accordion stone-trapping device: in vitro results from an artificial ureterolithotripsy model.

Authors:  Peter Jochen Olbert; Christian Keil; Jost Weber; Andres J Schrader; Axel Hegele; Rainer Hofmann
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-11-27

Review 2.  Preventing stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Osama M Elashry; Ahmad M Tawfik
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  A comparison of Stone Cone versus lidocaine jelly in the prevention of ureteral stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Authors:  Mohamed Bastawisy; Tarek Gameel; Mohamed Radwan; Ahmed Ramadan; Mutie Alkathiri; Adel Omar
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-10

4.  Update on ureteroscopy instrumentation.

Authors:  Renato N Pedro; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-07

5.  Prevention of stone retropulsion during ureteroscopy: Limitations in resources invites revival of old techniques.

Authors:  Tarek K Fathelbab; Amr M Abdelhamid; Ahmed Z M Anwar; Ehab M Galal; Mamdouh M El-Hawy; Ahmed H Abdelgawad; Ehab R Tawfiek
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2020-08-13

6.  Safety and efficacy of using the stone cone and an entrapment and extraction device in ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteric stones.

Authors:  Waleed Shabana; Mohamed Teleb; Tamer Dawod
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2015-03-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.