Literature DB >> 19941480

Molecular recognition and drug-lead identification: what can molecular simulations tell us?

Giulia Morra1, Alessandro Genoni, Marco A C Neves, Kenneth M Merz, Giorgio Colombo.   

Abstract

Molecular recognition and ligand binding involving proteins underlie the most important life processes within the cell, such as substrate transport, catalysis, signal transmission, receptor trafficking, gene regulation, switching on and off of biochemical pathways. Despite recent successes in predicting the structures of many protein-substrate complexes, the dynamic aspects of binding have been largely neglected by computational/theoretical investigations. Recently, several groups have started tackling these problems with the use of experimental and simulation methods and developed models describing the variation of protein dynamics upon complex formation, shedding light on how substrate or inhibitor binding can alter protein flexibility and function. The study of ligand-induced dynamic variations has also been exploited to review the concept of allosteric changes, in the absence of major conformational changes. In this context, the study of the influence of protein motions on signal transduction and on catalytic activities has been used to develop pharmacophore models based on ensembles of protein conformations. These models, taking flexibility explicitly into account, are able to distinguish active inhibitors versus nonactive drug-like compounds, to define new molecular motifs and to preferentially identify specific ligands for a certain protein target. The application of these methods holds great promise in advancing structure-based drug discovery and medicinal chemistry in general, opening up the possibility to explore broader chemical spaces than is normally done in an efficient way. In this review, examples illustrating the extent to which simulations can be used to understand these phenomena will be presented along with examples of methodological developments to increase physical understanding of the processes and improve the possibility to rationally design new molecules.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19941480     DOI: 10.2174/092986710789957797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Chem        ISSN: 0929-8673            Impact factor:   4.530


  17 in total

Review 1.  Flexibility and binding affinity in protein-ligand, protein-protein and multi-component protein interactions: limitations of current computational approaches.

Authors:  Pierre Tuffery; Philippe Derreumaux
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Ligand-guided optimization of CXCR4 homology models for virtual screening using a multiple chemotype approach.

Authors:  Marco A C Neves; Sérgio Simões; M Luisa Sá e Melo
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Free energy calculations offer insights into the influence of receptor flexibility on ligand-receptor binding affinities.

Authors:  Jožica Dolenc; Sereina Riniker; Roberto Gaspari; Xavier Daura; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Substrate dynamics in enzyme action: rotations of monosaccharide subunits in the binding groove are essential for pectin methylesterase processivity.

Authors:  Davide Mercadante; Laurence D Melton; Geoffrey B Jameson; Martin A K Williams; Alfonso De Simone
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Molecular recognition in the case of flexible targets.

Authors:  Anthony Ivetac; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.116

6.  Understanding of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone reaches new heights.

Authors:  Cara K Vaughan; Len Neckers; Peter W Piper
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 15.369

7.  Limits of Free Energy Computation for Protein-Ligand Interactions.

Authors:  Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 8.  Interactions of cytochrome P450s with their ligands.

Authors:  Kip P Conner; Caleb M Woods; William M Atkins
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 4.013

9.  Pairwise additivity of energy components in protein-ligand binding: the HIV II protease-Indinavir case.

Authors:  Melek N Ucisik; Danial S Dashti; John C Faver; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Docking and scoring with ICM: the benchmarking results and strategies for improvement.

Authors:  Marco A C Neves; Maxim Totrov; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.