SUMMARY: Attendance at a fragility-fractures-prevention workshop by primary care physicians was associated with higher rates of osteoporosis screening and treatment initiation in elderly female patients and higher rates of treatment initiation in high-risk male and female patients. However, osteoporosis management remained sub-optimal, particularly in men. INTRODUCTION: Rates of osteoporosis-related medical practices of primary care physicians exposed to a fragility-fractures-prevention workshop were compared with those of unexposed physicians. METHODS: In a cluster cohort study, 26 physicians exposed to a workshop were matched with 260 unexposed physicians by sex and year of graduation. For each physician, rates of bone mineral density (BMD) testing and osteoporosis treatment initiation among his/her elderly patients 1 year following the workshop were computed. Rates were compared using multilevel logistic regression models controlling for potential patient- and physician-level confounders. RESULTS: Twenty-five exposed physicians (1,124 patients) and 209 unexposed physicians (9,663 patients) followed at least one eligible patient. In women, followed by exposed physicians, higher rates of BMD testing [8.5% versus 4.2%, adjusted OR (aOR) = 2.81, 95% CI 1.60-4.94] and treatment initiation with bone-specific drugs (BSDs; 4.8% vs. 2.4%, aOR = 1.95, 1.06-3.60) were observed. In men, no differences were detected. In patients on long-term glucocorticoid therapy or with a previous osteoporotic fracture, higher rates of treatment initiation with BSDs were observed in women (12.0% vs. 1.9%, aOR = 7.38, 1.55-35.26), and men were more likely to initiate calcium/vitamin D (5.3% vs. 0.8%, aOR = 7.14, 1.16-44.06). CONCLUSIONS: Attendance at a primary care physician workshop was associated with higher rates of osteoporosis medical practices for elderly women and high-risk men and women. However, osteoporosis detection and treatment remained sub-optimal, particularly in men.
SUMMARY: Attendance at a fragility-fractures-prevention workshop by primary care physicians was associated with higher rates of osteoporosis screening and treatment initiation in elderly female patients and higher rates of treatment initiation in high-risk male and female patients. However, osteoporosis management remained sub-optimal, particularly in men. INTRODUCTION: Rates of osteoporosis-related medical practices of primary care physicians exposed to a fragility-fractures-prevention workshop were compared with those of unexposed physicians. METHODS: In a cluster cohort study, 26 physicians exposed to a workshop were matched with 260 unexposed physicians by sex and year of graduation. For each physician, rates of bone mineral density (BMD) testing and osteoporosis treatment initiation among his/her elderly patients 1 year following the workshop were computed. Rates were compared using multilevel logistic regression models controlling for potential patient- and physician-level confounders. RESULTS: Twenty-five exposed physicians (1,124 patients) and 209 unexposed physicians (9,663 patients) followed at least one eligible patient. In women, followed by exposed physicians, higher rates of BMD testing [8.5% versus 4.2%, adjusted OR (aOR) = 2.81, 95% CI 1.60-4.94] and treatment initiation with bone-specific drugs (BSDs; 4.8% vs. 2.4%, aOR = 1.95, 1.06-3.60) were observed. In men, no differences were detected. In patients on long-term glucocorticoid therapy or with a previous osteoporotic fracture, higher rates of treatment initiation with BSDs were observed in women (12.0% vs. 1.9%, aOR = 7.38, 1.55-35.26), and men were more likely to initiate calcium/vitamin D (5.3% vs. 0.8%, aOR = 7.14, 1.16-44.06). CONCLUSIONS: Attendance at a primary care physician workshop was associated with higher rates of osteoporosis medical practices for elderly women and high-risk men and women. However, osteoporosis detection and treatment remained sub-optimal, particularly in men.
Authors: Jeffrey R Curtis; Andrew O Westfall; Jeroan Allison; Angela Becker; Mary Elkins Melton; Allison Freeman; Catarina I Kiefe; Marilyn MacArthur; Theresa Ockershausen; Emily Stewart; Norm Weissman; Kenneth G Saag Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-03-26
Authors: Amir Qaseem; Vincenza Snow; Paul Shekelle; Robert Hopkins; Mary Ann Forciea; Douglas K Owens Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-05-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Sylvie Perreault; Alice Dragomir; Alain Desgagné; Lucie Blais; Michel Rossignol; Julie Blouin; Yola Moride; Louis-Georges Ste-Marie; Julio Cesar Fernandès Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Sumit R Majumdar; Jeffrey A Johnson; Finlay A McAlister; Debbie Bellerose; Anthony S Russell; David A Hanley; Don W Morrish; Walter P Maksymowych; Brian H Rowe Journal: CMAJ Date: 2008-02-26 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Jennifer C Davis; Pierre Guy; Maureen C Ashe; Teresa Liu-Ambrose; Karim Khan Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Adrianne Feldstein; Patricia J Elmer; David H Smith; Michael Herson; Eric Orwoll; Chuhe Chen; Mikel Aickin; Martha C Swain Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Daniel H Solomon; Jennifer M Polinski; Margaret Stedman; Colleen Truppo; Laura Breiner; Catherine Egan; Saira Jan; Minal Patel; Thomas W Weiss; Ya-ting Chen; M Alan Brookhart Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Phillip T Lawrence; Marissa P Grotzke; Yanina Rosenblum; Richard E Nelson; Joanne LaFleur; Karla L Miller; Junjie Ma; Grant W Cannon Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2017-01-17
Authors: Sultan H Alamri; Courtney C Kennedy; Sharon Marr; Lynne Lohfeld; Carly J Skidmore; Alexandra Papaioannou Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2015-08-01 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: E Michael Lewiecki; Jesse D Ortendahl; Jacqueline Vanderpuye-Orgle; Andreas Grauer; Jorge Arellano; Jeffrey Lemay; Amanda L Harmon; Michael S Broder; Andrea J Singer Journal: JBMR Plus Date: 2019-05-13