Literature DB >> 29549394

A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.

Ozan Dogan1, Aski Ellibes Kaya2,3, Cigdem Pulatoglu4,5, Alper Basbug2,6, Murat Yassa7,8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: There is a shortage of reliable data on the efficiency of the under-investigated mini-slings to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We aimed to compare the effectiveness of the single-incision needleless mini-sling (SIMS) with the transobturator inside-out mid-urethral sling (TOT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred one women with clinically proven SUI were included in this single-center prospective randomized trial. The patients were randomly allocated to the groups. All surgeries were done by the same single surgeon. Examinations were done by one other blinded surgeon. The patients were followed up for 24 months. Objective cure was defined as the absence of SUI and negative cough-stress test. Subjective cure was defined as no stress leakage of urine after surgery in a validated questionnaire. Failure of the surgery was defined as the need for reoperation. Every complaint was categorized by the IUGA/ICS Classification of Prosthesis-related Complications.
RESULTS: The objective (85.4% versus 89.9%, p = 0.362) and subjective (87.6% versus 89.9%, p = 0.636) cure rates were similar with the TOT and SIMS at the postoperative month 24, respectively. The mesh exposure ≤ 1 cm rate was 3.4% for both groups, and the mesh exposure > 1 cm rate was 2.2% for both groups. Overall failure rates were 3.4% and 2.2% for the TOT and SIMS group, respectively. No viscus organ perforation was noted. Complications with the SIMS procedure were less painful compared with TOT (p = 0.024).
CONCLUSIONS: Single-incision needleless mini-slings exhibited similar cure rates as the trans-obturator mid-urethral slings from both the patient and clinician points of view in 24 months of follow-up. Mini-slings resulted in significantly less postoperative pain than trans-obturator mid-urethral slings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Midurethral sling; Mini-slings; Single-incision tapes; Stress urinary incontinence; Tension-free vaginal tape; Urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29549394     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-018-3624-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  27 in total

1.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery.

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Robert M Freeman; Steven E Swift; Michel Cosson; G Willy Davila; Jan Deprest; Peter L Dwyer; Brigitte Fatton; Ervin Kocjancic; Joseph Lee; Chris Maher; Eckhard Petri; Diaa E Rizk; Peter K Sand; Gabriel N Schaer; Ralph Webb
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  Mesh removal following transvaginal mesh placement: a case series of 104 operations.

Authors:  Naama Marcus-Braun; Peter von Theobald
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Midurethral slings: evidence-based medicine vs the medicolegal system.

Authors:  Charles W Nager
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Postoperative pain after adjustable single-incision or transobturator sling for incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Karlijn J Schweitzer; Alfredo L Milani; Hugo W F van Eijndhoven; Dirk A Gietelink; Eric Hallensleben; Geert-Jan Cromheecke; Carl H van der Vaart
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Purely transvaginal/perineal management of complications from commercial prolapse kits using a new prostheses/grafts complication classification system.

Authors:  Farzeen Firoozi; Michael S Ingber; Courtenay K Moore; Sandip P Vasavada; Raymond R Rackley; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Predicting the number of women who will undergo incontinence and prolapse surgery, 2010 to 2050.

Authors:  Jennifer M Wu; Amie Kawasaki; Andrew F Hundley; Alexis A Dieter; Evan R Myers; Vivian W Sung
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Removal or Revision of Vaginal Mesh Used for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence.

Authors:  Blayne Welk; Hana'a Al-Hothi; Jennifer Winick-Ng
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  Stress urinary incontinence surgery trends in academic female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery urology practice in the setting of the food and drug administration public health notifications.

Authors:  Goran Rac; Austin Younger; James Q Clemens; Kathleen Kobashi; Aqsa Khan; Victor Nitti; Ilana Jacobs; Gary E Lemack; Elizabeth T Brown; Roger Dmochowski; Lara MacLachlan; Arthur Mourtzinos; David Ginsberg; Michelle Koski; Ross Rames; Eric S Rovner
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.696

9.  Transobturator sling compared with single-incision mini-sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lucyana M Djehdian; Maita P Araujo; Claudia C Takano; Carlos A Del-Roy; Marair G F Sartori; Manoel J B C Girão; Rodrigo A Castro
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 10.  Comparison between the retropubic and transobturator approaches in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications.

Authors:  Xincheng Sun; Qingsong Yang; Feng Sun; Qinglu Shi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

View more
  2 in total

1.  Focusing on long-term complications of mid-urethral slings among women with stress urinary incontinence as a patient safety improvement measure: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi-Hao Lin; Cheng-Kai Lee; Shuenn-Dyh Chang; Pei-Chun Chien; Yu-Ying Hsu; Ling-Hong Tseng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Contasure-needleless single incision slings versus transobturator slings (TOT/TVT-O) for female patients with stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhenkai Luo; Binbin Jiao; Hang Zhao; Hailong Liu; Shicong Lai; Guan Zhang
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.264

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.