Literature DB >> 18937698

Safety of Trans Vaginal Mesh procedure: retrospective study of 684 patients.

Fréderic Caquant1, Pierre Collinet, Philippe Debodinance, Juan Berrocal, Olivier Garbin, Claude Rosenthal, Henri Clave, Richard Villet, Bernard Jacquetin, Michel Cosson.   

Abstract

AIM: To study peri-surgical complications after cure of genital prolapse by vaginal route using interposition of synthetic prostheses Gynemesh Prolene Soft (Gynecare) following the Trans Vaginal Mesh (TVM) technique.
METHODS: The present retrospective multicentered study comprised 684 patients who underwent surgery at seven French centers between October 2002 and December 2004. All patients had a genital prolapse >or=3 (C3/H3/E3/R3) according to International continence society (ICS) classification. According to each case, prosthetic interposition was total, or anterior only or posterior only. Patients were systematically seen 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery. Multivaried statistical analysis followed a model of logistic regression applied to each post-surgical complication.
RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 63.5 years (30-94). The mean follow-up period was 3.6 months. 84.3% of patients were post-menopause, 24.3% had hysterectomy, 16.7% previous cure of prolapse, and 11.1% cure of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). During the procedure, hysterectomy was combined in 50.3% of cases, cervix amputation in 1.5%, and cure of SUI in 40.9%. 15.8% were treated for a cystocele only. 14.8% had only a rectocele +/- elytrocele and 69.4% had a prolapse touching both compartments, anterior and posterior. In peri-surgical complications, (2%) were five bladder wounds (0.7%), one rectal wound (0.15%) and seven hemorrhages greater that 200 mL (1%). Among early post-surgical complications (during the first month after surgery) (2.8%) were two pelvic abscesses (0.29%), 13 pelvic hematomas (1.9%), one pelvic cellulitis (0.15%), two vesicovaginal fistulas and one rectovaginal fistula (0.15%). Among late post-surgical complications (33.6%) there were 77 granulomas or prosthetic expositions (11.3% [6.7% in the vaginal anterior wall, 2.1% in the vaginal posterior wall and 4.8% in the fornix]), 80 prosthetic retractions (11.7%), 36 relapse of prolapse (6.9%) and 37 SUI de novo (5.4%). Multivaried analysis shows that previous history of hysterectomy or placing of an isolated anterior prosthesis increase the risk of peri-surgical complication; preserved uterus and isolated posterior prosthesis lessen the risk of granulomas and prosthetic retractions; and association of a Richter's intervention increases the rate of prosthetic retractions.
CONCLUSION: Cure of genital prolapse with synthetic prostheses interposed by vaginal route is now reliable and can be reproduced with a low rate of peri- and early post-surgical complications. However, our study shows a certain number of late post-surgical complications after insertion of strengthening synthetic vaginal implants (prosthetic expositions and prosthetic retractions). These retrospective results will soon be compared to a prospective study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18937698     DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00820.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  46 in total

Review 1.  What is the gold standard for posterior vaginal wall prolapse repair: mesh or native tissue?

Authors:  Brian K Marks; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Informed surgical consent for a mesh/graft-augmented vaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Consensus of the 2nd IUGA Grafts Roundtable: optimizing safety and appropriateness of graft use in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Dennis Miller; Alfredo L Milani; Suzette E Sutherland; Bonnie Navin; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Bladder polyps following Avaulta anterior mesh vaginal wall repair.

Authors:  M Auzin; T M Teune; C J A Hogewoning
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Loic Sentilhes
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Cystocele repair with single-incision, trocarless mesh system.

Authors:  Naama Marcus-Braun; Peter von Theobald
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Mesh removal following transvaginal mesh placement: a case series of 104 operations.

Authors:  Naama Marcus-Braun; Peter von Theobald
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Managing chronic pelvic pain following reconstructive pelvic surgery with transvaginal mesh.

Authors:  Anthony N Gyang; Jessica B Feranec; Rakesh C Patel; Georgine M Lamvu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Perioperative complications in vaginal mesh procedures using trocar in pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Fuat Demirci; Karakoc Birgul; Oya Demirci; Elif Demirci; Yavuz Akman; Erhan Karaalp; Nihal Dolgun
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-05-15

9.  Polypropylene as a reinforcement in pelvic surgery is not inert: comparative analysis of 100 explants.

Authors:  Arnaud Clavé; Hannah Yahi; Jean-Claude Hammou; Suzelei Montanari; Pierre Gounon; Henri Clavé
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Cystocele repair by transobturator four arms mesh: monocentric experience of first 123 patients.

Authors:  Cyril Eboue; Naama Marcus-Braun; Peter von Theobald
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.