Literature DB >> 15078046

Linear separability in superordinate natural language concepts.

Wim Ruts1, Gert Storms, James Hampton.   

Abstract

Two experiments are reported in which linear separability was investigated in superordinate natural language concept pairs (e.g., toiletry-sewing gear). Representations of the exemplars of semantically related concept pairs were derived in two to five dimensions using multidimensional scaling (MDS) of similarities based on possession of the concept features. Next, category membership, obtained from an exemplar generation study (in Experiment 1) and from a forced-choice classification task (in Experiment 2) was predicted from the coordinates of the MDS representation using log linear analysis. The results showed that all natural kind concept pairs were perfectly linearly separable, whereas artifact concept pairs showed several violations. Clear linear separability of natural language concept pairs is in line with independent cue models. The violations in the artifact pairs, however, yield clear evidence against the independent cue models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15078046     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  10 in total

1.  Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: a distributed account of category-specific deficits.

Authors:  L K Tyler; H E Moss; M R Durrant-Peatfield; J P Levy
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 2.  Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: "category-specific" neuropsychological deficits.

Authors:  G W Humphreys; E M Forde
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  Expanding the search for a linear separability constraint on category learning.

Authors:  M Blair; D Homa
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-12

4.  Categorization of novel stimuli in well-known natural concepts: a case study.

Authors:  G Storms; P De Boeck; W Ruts
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

5.  Fruits and vegetables categorized: an application of the generalized context model.

Authors:  Tim Smits; Gert Storms; Yves Rosseel; Paul De Boeck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

Review 6.  Similarity-based categorization and fuzziness of natural categories.

Authors:  J A Hampton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-01

7.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1986-03

8.  Linear separability and concept learning: context, relational properties, and concept naturalness.

Authors:  W D Wattenmaker; G I Dewey; T D Murphy; D L Medin
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Abstraction of visual patterns.

Authors:  J J Franks; J D Bransford
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-09

10.  Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.051

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Revisiting the linear separability constraint: New implications for theories of human category learning.

Authors:  Kimery R Levering; Nolan Conaway; Kenneth J Kurtz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-04

2.  Feature integration in natural language concepts.

Authors:  James A Hampton; Gert Storms; Claire L Simmons; Daniel Heussen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-12

3.  On domain differences in categorization and context variety.

Authors:  Steven Verheyen; Daniel Heussen; Gert Storms
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

4.  Stages of category learning in monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  J David Smith; William P Chapman; Joshua S Redford
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.