Literature DB >> 19928107

Dose-calculation algorithms in the context of inhomogeneity corrections for high energy photon beams.

Niko Papanikolaou1, Sotirios Stathakis.   

Abstract

Radiation therapy has witnessed a plethora of innovations and developments in the past 15 years. Since the introduction of computed tomography for treatment planning there has been a steady introduction of new methods to refine treatment delivery. Imaging continues to be an integral part of the planning, but also the delivery, of modern radiotherapy. However, all the efforts of image guided radiotherapy, intensity-modulated planning and delivery, adaptive radiotherapy, and everything else that we pride ourselves in having in the armamentarium can fall short, unless there is an accurate dose-calculation algorithm. The agreement between the calculated and delivered doses is of great significance in radiation therapy since the accuracy of the absorbed dose as prescribed determines the clinical outcome. Dose-calculation algorithms have evolved greatly over the years in an effort to be more inclusive of the effects that govern the true radiation transport through the human body. In this Vision 20/20 paper, we look back to see how it all started and where things are now in terms of dose algorithms for photon beams and the inclusion of tissue heterogeneities. Convolution-superposition algorithms have dominated the treatment planning industry for the past few years. Monte Carlo techniques have an inherent accuracy that is superior to any other algorithm and as such will continue to be the gold standard, along with measurements, and maybe one day will be the algorithm of choice for all particle treatment planning in radiation therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19928107     DOI: 10.1118/1.3213523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  7 in total

1.  The effects of the orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O-MAR) algorithm on contouring and dosimetry of head and neck radiotherapy patients.

Authors:  Jussi Sillanpaa; Michael Lovelock; Boris Mueller
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 1.482

2.  On the quantification of the dosimetric accuracy of collapsed cone convolution superposition (CCCS) algorithm for small lung volumes using IMRT.

Authors:  Oscar I Calvo; Alonso N Gutiérrez; Sotirios Stathakis; Carlos Esquivel; Nikos Papanikolaou
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a.: Commissioning and QA of Treatment Planning Dose Calculations - Megavoltage Photon and Electron Beams.

Authors:  Jennifer B Smilowitz; Indra J Das; Vladimir Feygelman; Benedick A Fraass; Stephen F Kry; Ingrid R Marshall; Dimitris N Mihailidis; Zoubir Ouhib; Timothy Ritter; Michael G Snyder; Lynne Fairobent
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Validation of PRIMO Monte Carlo Model of Clinac®iX 6MV Photon Beam.

Authors:  B Sarin; B Bindhu; B Saju; Raguram K Nair
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2020-03-13

5.  Incorporating biological modeling into patient-specific plan verification.

Authors:  Ara N Alexandrian; Panayiotis Mavroidis; Ganesh Narayanasamy; Kristen A McConnell; Christopher N Kabat; Renil B George; Dewayne L Defoor; Neil Kirby; Nikos Papanikolaou; Sotirios Stathakis
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Extending in aqua portal dosimetry with dose inhomogeneity conversion maps for accurate patient dose reconstruction in external beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Igor Olaciregui-Ruiz; Julia-Maria Osinga-Blaettermann; Karen Ortega-Marin; Ben Mijnheer; Anton Mans
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-04-14

7.  AAPM MEDICAL PHYSICS PRACTICE GUIDELINE 5.b: Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations-Megavoltage photon and electron beams.

Authors:  Mark W Geurts; Dustin J Jacqmin; Lindsay E Jones; Stephen F Kry; Dimitris N Mihailidis; Jared D Ohrt; Timothy Ritter; Jennifer B Smilowitz; Nicholai E Wingreen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.243

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.