Literature DB >> 19923687

Dosimetric characterization of a cone-beam O-arm imaging system.

Jie Zhang1, Victor Weir, Liliosa Fajardo, Jingying Lin, Hsiang Hsiung, E Russell Ritenour.   

Abstract

This study compared patient dose and image quality of a mobile O-arm cone beam imaging system in the 3D scan acquisition mode to those of a 64 slice Computed Tomography (CT) imaging system. The investigation included patient dose, scattered radiation, and image quality measurements. The patient dose was measured using a 0.6 cc Farmer ion chamber and 30 cm long Computed Tomography (CT) head and body polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) phantoms. The results show that under identical radiographic techniques (kVp, mAs, etc.) and with the same scan length, the O-arm in 3D scan acquisition mode delivers approximately half the radiation dose of a 64 slice CT scanner. Scattered radiation was measured at several locations around the O-arm, at 1 m, 2 m and 3 m distances in 3D CT scan acquisition mode with a RadCal 10 x 5-180 pancake ion chamber using a 30 cm long CT body phantom as the source of scatter. Similar measurements were made in a 64 slice CT scanner. The data demonstrate that scattered radiation from the O-arm to personnel involved in a clinical procedure is comparable to that from a 64 slice CT scanner. Image quality was compared by exposing a CATPHAN phantom to comparable doses in both the O-arm and the CT scanner. The resultant images were then evaluated for modulation transfer function (MTF), high-contrast spatial resolution, and low contrast sensitivity for clinical application purpose. The O-arm shows comparable high contrast to the CT (7 lp/cm vs. 8 lp/cm). The low contrast in the O-arm is not visible due to fixed pattern noise. For image guided surgery applications where the location of a structure is emphasized over a survey of all image details, the O-arm has some advantages due to wide radiation beam coverage and lower patient dose. The image quality of the O-arm needs significant improvement for other clinical applications where high image quality is desired.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19923687     DOI: 10.3233/XST-2009-0231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol        ISSN: 0895-3996            Impact factor:   1.535


  29 in total

1.  Robot arm based flat panel CT-guided electromagnetic tracked spine interventions: phantom and animal model experiments.

Authors:  Tobias Penzkofer; Peter Isfort; Philipp Bruners; Christian Wiemann; Yiannis Kyriakou; Willi A Kalender; Rolf W Günther; Thomas Schmitz-Rode; Andreas H Mahnken
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Mobile C-arm cone-beam CT for guidance of spine surgery: image quality, radiation dose, and integration with interventional guidance.

Authors:  S Schafer; S Nithiananthan; D J Mirota; A Uneri; J W Stayman; W Zbijewski; C Schmidgunst; G Kleinszig; A J Khanna; J H Siewerdsena
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A case series of rapid prototyping and intraoperative imaging in orbital reconstruction.

Authors:  Christopher G T Lim; Duncan I Campbell; Nicholas Cook; Jason Erasmus
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-11-03

4.  Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in posterior scoliosis surgery: a comparison between intraoperative navigation and preoperative navigation techniques.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Tomoyuki Takigawa; YongGang Wu; Yoshihisa Sugimoto; Masato Tanaka; Toshifumi Ozaki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Accuracy of a new intraoperative cone beam CT imaging technique (Artis zeego II) compared to postoperative CT scan for assessment of pedicle screws placement and breaches detection.

Authors:  Virginie Cordemans; Ludovic Kaminski; Xavier Banse; Bernard G Francq; Olivier Cartiaux
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Impact of prone, supine and oblique patient positioning on CBCT image quality, contrast-to-noise ratio and figure of merit value in the maxillofacial region.

Authors:  Juha Koivisto; Maureen van Eijnatten; Jorma Järnstedt; Kirsi Holli-Helenius; Prasun Dastidar; Jan Wolff
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Soft-tissue imaging with C-arm cone-beam CT using statistical reconstruction.

Authors:  Adam S Wang; J Webster Stayman; Yoshito Otake; Gerhard Kleinszig; Sebastian Vogt; Gary L Gallia; A Jay Khanna; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Self-calibration of cone-beam CT geometry using 3D-2D image registration.

Authors:  S Ouadah; J W Stayman; G J Gang; T Ehtiati; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Does less invasive spine surgery result in increased radiation exposure? A systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Yu; Safdar N Khan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Radiation exposure using the O-arm® surgical imaging system.

Authors:  Nicolas Pitteloud; Axel Gamulin; Christophe Barea; Jerome Damet; Guillaume Racloz; Marta Sans-Merce
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.