Literature DB >> 1992342

Two-tone distortion in the basilar membrane of the cochlea.

L Robles1, M A Ruggero, N C Rich.   

Abstract

When humans listen to pairs of thnes they hear additional tones, or distortion products, that are not present in the stimulus. Two-tone distortion products are also known as combination tones, because their pitches match combinations of the primary frequencies (f1 and f2, f2 greater than f1), such as f2-f1, (n + 1)f1-nf2 and (n + 1)f2-nf1 (n = 1, 2, 3...). Physiological correlates of the perceived distortion products exist in responses of auditory-nerve fibres and inner hair cells and in otoacoustic emissions (sounds generated by the cochlea, recordable at the ear canal). Because the middle ear responds linearly to sound and neural responses to distortion products can be abolished by damage to hair cells at cochlear sites preferentially tuned to the frequencies of the primary tones, it was hypothesized that distortion products are generated at these sites and propagate mechanically along the basilar membrane to the location tuned to the distortion-product frequency. But until now, efforts to confirm this hypothesis have failed. Here we report the use of a new laser-velocimetry technique to demonstrate two-tone distortion in basilar-membrane motion at low and moderate stimulus intensities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1992342      PMCID: PMC3579518          DOI: 10.1038/349413a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  15 in total

1.  Auditory nonlinearity.

Authors:  J L Goldstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero; N C Rich
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The modulation of the sensitivity of the mammalian cochlea by low frequency tones. III. Basilar membrane motion.

Authors:  R Patuzzi; P M Sellick; B M Johnstone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical nonlinearity.

Authors:  J H Siegel; D O Kim
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2.

Authors:  J H Siegel; D O Kim; C E Molnar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mössbauer technique.

Authors:  P M Sellick; R Patuzzi; B M Johnstone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure.

Authors:  D O Kim; C E Molnar; J W Matthews
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Laser--Doppler velocity meter applied to tympanic membrane vibrations in cat.

Authors:  T J Buunen; M S Vlaming
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  D C Mountain
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-10-03       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1979
View more
  30 in total

1.  Active auditory mechanics in mosquitoes.

Authors:  M C Göpfert; D Robert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Compressive nonlinearity in the hair bundle's active response to mechanical stimulation.

Authors:  P Martin; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Physical basis of two-tone interference in hearing.

Authors:  F Jülicher; D Andor; T Duke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Basilar membrane responses to two-tone and broadband stimuli.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; L Robles; N C Rich; A Recio
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1992-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  High-frequency two-tone distortions from the ear of the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii reflect enhanced cochlear tuning.

Authors:  M Kössl
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1992-09

7.  Distortion in those good vibrations.

Authors:  M A Ruggero
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 8.  Responses to sound of the basilar membrane of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  M A Ruggero
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 9.  [Sound and velocity DPOAEs : Technology, methodology and perspectives].

Authors:  E Dalhoff; A Vetesník; D Turcanu; A W Gummer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  Fast reverse propagation of sound in the living cochlea.

Authors:  Wenxuan He; Anders Fridberger; Edward Porsov; Tianying Ren
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.