BACKGROUND: To perform a colonoscopy, the endoscopist maneuvers the colonoscope through a series of loops by applying force to the insertion tube. Colonoscopy insertion techniques are operator dependent but have never been comprehensively quantified. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the Colonoscopy Force Monitor (CFM), a device that continually measures force applied to the insertion tube, can identify different force application patterns among experienced endoscopists. DESIGN: Observational study of 6 experienced endoscopists performing routine diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy in 30 patients. SETTING: Outpatient ambulatory endoscopy center. PATIENTS: Adult male and female patients between 30 and 75 years of age undergoing routine colonoscopy. INTERVENTIONS: CFM monitoring of force applied to the colonoscope insertion tube during colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Maximum and mean linear and torque force, time derivative of force, combined linear and torque vector force, and total manipulation time. RESULTS: The CFM demonstrates differences among endoscopists for maximum and average push/pull and mean torque forces, time derivatives of force, combined push/torque force vector, and total manipulation time. Endoscopists could be grouped by force application patterns. LIMITATIONS: Only experienced endoscopists using conscious sedation in the patients were studied. Sample size was 30 patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that CFM allows continuous force monitoring, characterization, and display of similarities and differences in endoscopic technique. CFM has the potential to facilitate training by enabling trainees to assess, compare, and quantify their techniques and progress.
BACKGROUND: To perform a colonoscopy, the endoscopist maneuvers the colonoscope through a series of loops by applying force to the insertion tube. Colonoscopy insertion techniques are operator dependent but have never been comprehensively quantified. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the Colonoscopy Force Monitor (CFM), a device that continually measures force applied to the insertion tube, can identify different force application patterns among experienced endoscopists. DESIGN: Observational study of 6 experienced endoscopists performing routine diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy in 30 patients. SETTING:Outpatient ambulatory endoscopy center. PATIENTS: Adult male and female patients between 30 and 75 years of age undergoing routine colonoscopy. INTERVENTIONS: CFM monitoring of force applied to the colonoscope insertion tube during colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Maximum and mean linear and torque force, time derivative of force, combined linear and torque vector force, and total manipulation time. RESULTS: The CFM demonstrates differences among endoscopists for maximum and average push/pull and mean torque forces, time derivatives of force, combined push/torque force vector, and total manipulation time. Endoscopists could be grouped by force application patterns. LIMITATIONS: Only experienced endoscopists using conscious sedation in the patients were studied. Sample size was 30 patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that CFM allows continuous force monitoring, characterization, and display of similarities and differences in endoscopic technique. CFM has the potential to facilitate training by enabling trainees to assess, compare, and quantify their techniques and progress.
Authors: Amandeep K Shergill; Krishna R Asundi; Alan Barr; Janak N Shah; James C Ryan; Kenneth R McQuaid; David Rempel Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Bernd Bokemeyer; Herbert Bock; Dietrich Hüppe; Marc Düffelmeyer; Axel Rambow; Wolfgang Tacke; Herbert Koop Journal: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 2.566
Authors: H S Tran Cao; B C Cosman; B Devaraj; S Ramamoorthy; T Savides; M L Krinsky; S Horgan; M A Talamini; M K Savu Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2009-03-06 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Douglas K Rex; David A Johnson; Joseph C Anderson; Phillip S Schoenfeld; Carol A Burke; John M Inadomi Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-02-24 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: J R A Skipworth; D A Raptis; J S Rawal; S Olde Damink; A Shankar; M Malago; C Imber Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 1.891
Authors: Louis Y Korman; Lawrence J Brandt; David C Metz; Nadim G Haddad; Stanley B Benjamin; Susan K Lazerow; Hannah L Miller; David A Greenwald; Sameer Desale; Milind Patel; Armen Sarvazyan Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2012-07-27 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Wu-Bin Cheng; Yun-Yun Di; Edwin M Zhang; Michael A J Moser; Sivaruban Kanagaratnam; Louis Y Korman; Noune Sarvazyan; Wen-Jun Zhang Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Shiva K Ratuapli; Kevin C Ruff; Francisco C Ramirez; Qing Wu; Deepika Mohankumar; Marco Santello; David E Fleischer Journal: Endosc Int Open Date: 2015-11-05