Literature DB >> 19445041

Screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer prevention: results from a German online registry on 269000 cases.

Bernd Bokemeyer1, Herbert Bock, Dietrich Hüppe, Marc Düffelmeyer, Axel Rambow, Wolfgang Tacke, Herbert Koop.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of screening colonoscopy in general use remains to be determined. Here we report data over a 39-month study period collected in a nationwide online registry. STUDY: Data from consecutive screening colonoscopies performed on asymptomatic patients in the practices of 280 participating gastroenterologists (age 55-99 years) were collected in an online registry. The number and histology of colorectal polyps and carcinomas, complication rates of colonoscopy and polypectomy were registered. Advanced adenoma was defined as an adenoma of >or= 10 mm in diameter, villous or tubulovillous in histology, or presence of high-grade dysplasia.
RESULTS: A total of 269 144 colonoscopies (male 44%) were evaluated. Tubular, villous/tubulovillous adenomas and invasive cancers were found in 15.6, 3.7, and 0.8%, respectively. Advanced adenomas amounted to 7.1%. In 95% of polyps greater than 5mm and less than 30 mm immediate polypectomy was performed. In 399 of the 575 carcinomas with complete tumor node metastasis stages, which were detected during colonoscopy, early stages dominated (UICC stages I and II in 43 and 27%, respectively). Complication rate was low and no fatalities were observed: cardiopulmonary complication in 0.10% of the colonoscopies, bleeding in 0.8% of polypectomies most of which were managed endoscopically (surgery in 0.03% of polypectomies). Perforation occurred in 0.02% of the colonoscopies and 0.09% of polypectomies.
CONCLUSION: Colonic neoplasias are detected in about 20% of patients most of which are immediately removed by polypectomy at a low risk. Polypectomy of adenomas and low UICC stages in cancer patients during screening colonoscopy may be tools for fighting colorectal cancer mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19445041     DOI: 10.1097/meg.0b013e32830b8acf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  22 in total

1.  Endoscopic evaluation of the colon after an episode of diverticulitis: a call for a more selective approach.

Authors:  Bryan J M van de Wall; Ellen M B P Reuling; Esther C J Consten; Janneke H J van Grinsven; Matthijs P Schwartz; Ivo A M J Broeders; Werner A Draaisma
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The incidence of colon cancer among patients diagnosed with left colonic or sigmoid acute diverticulitis is higher than in the general population.

Authors:  Jeremy Meyer; Theodoros Thomopoulos; Massimo Usel; Ergys Gjika; Christine Bouchardy; Philippe Morel; Frédéric Ris
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Malignant colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Luis Bujanda; Angel Cosme; Ines Gil; Juan I Arenas-Mirave
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  [Colorectal adenoma: pro-endoscopic removal].

Authors:  A Probst; H Messmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  Post-Colonoscopy Complications: A Systematic Review, Time Trends, and Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Studies.

Authors:  Ankie Reumkens; Eveline J A Rondagh; C Minke Bakker; Bjorn Winkens; Ad A M Masclee; Silvia Sanduleanu
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Use of automated irrigation pumps improves quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Sujan Ravi; Rana Sabbagh; Fadi Antaki
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-03-25

7.  Complication Rates in Colonoscopy Screening for Cancer.

Authors:  Nadine Zwink; Bernd Holleczek; Christa Stegmaier; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  The potential of imaging techniques as a screening tool for colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Marjolein J E Greuter; Johannes Berkhof; Remond J A Fijneman; Erhan Demirel; Jie-Bin Lew; Gerrit A Meijer; Jaap Stoker; Veerle M H Coupé
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Characterization of forces applied by endoscopists during colonoscopy by using a wireless colonoscopy force monitor.

Authors:  Louis Y Korman; Vladimir Egorov; Sergey Tsuryupa; Brendan Corbin; Mary Anderson; Noune Sarvazyan; Armen Sarvazyan
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Diagnostic impact of routine colonoscopy following acute diverticulitis: A multicenter study in 808 patients and controls.

Authors:  Stéphane Lecleire; Stéphane Nahon; Abdullah Alatawi; Michel Antonietti; Ulriikka Chaput; Aude Di-Fiore; Raied Alhameedi; Philippe Marteau; Philippe Ducrotté; Xavier Dray
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.