Literature DB >> 19921349

High pressure may inhibit periprosthetic osteogenesis.

Kongzu Hu1, Chengtao Wang, Xianlong Zhang.   

Abstract

Mechanical effects have been demonstrated to activate periprosthetic osteoclasts and hence to promote bone resorption. However, the periprosthetic mechanical effect on osteoblast function is not clearly understood. The purpose of this study was to explore whether the high pressure on bone caused by a prosthesis affects periprosthetic osteoblast function. We applied static pressure of various magnitudes to SV40-transfected human fetal osteoblast cells, then assayed bioactivities compared to cells cultured without pressure (control). The results showed that osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, necrosis, and mineralization were all sensitive to static pressure, and the effects were magnitude dependent. Low-level static pressure (20 kPa) enhanced osteogenesis. Under 50-100 kPa static pressure, proliferation was inhibited and apoptosis was enhanced, but the cellular phenotype could be maintained. High pressure (250-500 kPa) totally inhibited the bioactivity of the osteoblasts and induced necrosis. Mineralization nodules decreased significantly under 100 kPa pressure, while no nodules could be found under 250 and 500 kPa pressure. RUNX2, COL-1, and BGP mRNA expression was significantly downregulated under 250 and 500 kPa. SOX9 expression was significantly upregulated at 100 kPa but significantly downregulated at 250 and 500 kPa. RANKL/OPG expression was increased under pressure, and the differences were significant at 100 and 500 kPa. These results suggest that periprosthetic high pressure may inhibit osteogenesis and promote osteoclastogenesis. Countermeasures should be developed to improve periprosthetic osteogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19921349     DOI: 10.1007/s00774-009-0137-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab        ISSN: 0914-8779            Impact factor:   2.626


  32 in total

1.  A model for strain amplification in the actin cytoskeleton of osteocytes due to fluid drag on pericellular matrix.

Authors:  L You; S C Cowin; M B Schaffler; S Weinbaum
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Monitoring of periprosthetic BMD after uncemented total hip arthroplasty with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry--a 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  P K Venesmaa; H P Kröger; H J Miettinen; J S Jurvelin; O T Suomalainen; E M Alhava
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Assessments of different kinds of stems by experiments and FEM analysis: appropriate stress distribution on a hip prosthesis.

Authors:  Rina Sakai; Moritoshi Itoman; Kiyoshi Mabuchi
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Microstimulation at the bone-implant interface upregulates osteoclast activation pathways.

Authors:  Vincent A Stadelmann; Alexandre Terrier; Dominique P Pioletti
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Longitudinal evaluation of time related bone remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  T Nishii; N Sugano; K Masuhara; T Shibuya; T Ochi; S Tamura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Local stresses and bone adaption around orthopedic implants.

Authors:  R Huiskes; D Nunamaker
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Development and characterization of a conditionally immortalized human fetal osteoblastic cell line.

Authors:  S A Harris; R J Enger; B L Riggs; T C Spelsberg
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Joint forces in the human pelvis-leg skeleton during walking.

Authors:  H Röhrle; R Scholten; C Sigolotto; W Sollbach; H Kellner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodelling after implantation of anatomic and straight stem prostheses in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  L F Grochola; B Habermann; N Mastrodomenico; A Kurth
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Total hip arthroplasties: what are the reasons for revision?

Authors:  Slif D Ulrich; Thorsten M Seyler; Derek Bennett; Ronald E Delanois; Khaled J Saleh; Issada Thongtrangan; Michael Kuskowski; Edward Y Cheng; Peter F Sharkey; Javad Parvizi; James B Stiehl; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Dry Socket Etiology, Diagnosis, and Clinical Treatment Techniques.

Authors:  John Mamoun
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-04-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.