AIMS: To develop a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model to describe the occurrence and severity of bleeding or bruising as a function of enoxaparin exposure. METHODS: Data were obtained from a randomized controlled trial (n = 118) that compared conventional dosing of enoxaparin (product label) with an individualized dosing regimen. Anti-Xa concentrations were sampled using a sparse design and the size, location and type of bruising and bleeding event, during enoxaparin therapy, were collected daily. A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effects techniques. The final model was used to explore how the probability of events in patients with obesity and/or renal impairment varied under differing dosing strategies. RESULTS:Three hundred and forty-nineanti-Xa concentrations were available for analysis. A two-compartment first-order absorption and elimination model best fit the data, with lean body weight describing between-subject variability in clearance and central volume of distribution. A three-category proportional-odds model described the occurrence and severity of events as a function of both cumulative enoxaparin AUC (cAUC) and subject age. Simulations showed that individualized dosing decreased the probability of a bleeding or major bruising event when compared with conventional dosing, which was most noticeable in subjects with obesity and renal impairment. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence and severity of a bleeding or major bruising event to enoxaparin, administered for the treatment of a thromboembolic disease, can be described as a function of both cAUC and subject age. Individualized dosing of enoxaparin will reduce the probability of an event.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To develop a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model to describe the occurrence and severity of bleeding or bruising as a function of enoxaparin exposure. METHODS: Data were obtained from a randomized controlled trial (n = 118) that compared conventional dosing of enoxaparin (product label) with an individualized dosing regimen. Anti-Xa concentrations were sampled using a sparse design and the size, location and type of bruising and bleeding event, during enoxaparin therapy, were collected daily. A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effects techniques. The final model was used to explore how the probability of events in patients with obesity and/or renal impairment varied under differing dosing strategies. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-nine anti-Xa concentrations were available for analysis. A two-compartment first-order absorption and elimination model best fit the data, with lean body weight describing between-subject variability in clearance and central volume of distribution. A three-category proportional-odds model described the occurrence and severity of events as a function of both cumulative enoxaparin AUC (cAUC) and subject age. Simulations showed that individualized dosing decreased the probability of a bleeding or major bruising event when compared with conventional dosing, which was most noticeable in subjects with obesity and renal impairment. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence and severity of a bleeding or major bruising event to enoxaparin, administered for the treatment of a thromboembolic disease, can be described as a function of both cAUC and subject age. Individualized dosing of enoxaparin will reduce the probability of an event.
Authors: Ene I Ette; Paul J Williams; Yong Ho Kim; James R Lane; Mei-Jen Liu; Edmund V Capparelli Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Sarayut Janmahasatian; Stephen B Duffull; Avry Chagnac; Carl M J Kirkpatrick; Bruce Green Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2008-02-15 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: G Merli; T E Spiro; C G Olsson; U Abildgaard; B L Davidson; A Eldor; D Elias; A Grigg; D Musset; G M Rodgers; A A Trowbridge; R D Yusen; K Zawilska Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2001-02-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Colton M Miller; Yongmei Xu; Katrina M Kudrna; Blake E Hass; Brianna M Kellar; Andrew W Egger; Jian Liu; Edward N Harris Journal: Thromb Res Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 3.944
Authors: Margreke J E Brill; Jeroen Diepstraten; Anne van Rongen; Simone van Kralingen; John N van den Anker; Catherijne A J Knibbe Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Jeroen Diepstraten; Esther J H Janssen; Christian M Hackeng; Eric P A van Dongen; René J Wiezer; Bert van Ramshorst; Catherijne A J Knibbe Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2014-10-12 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Jeffrey K Aronson; Adam La Caze; Michael P Kelly; Veli-Pekka Parkkinen; Jon Williamson Journal: J Eval Clin Pract Date: 2018-06-11 Impact factor: 2.431