Literature DB >> 11728348

Prospective comparison of hemorrhagic complications after treatment with enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for unstable angina pectoris or non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction.

S D Berkowitz1, S Stinnett, M Cohen, G J Fromell, F Bigonzi.   

Abstract

Patients with unstable angina pectoris (UAP) or non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are at risk of death or recurrent ischemic events, despite receiving aspirin and unfractionated heparin (UFH). This study investigates the effect of the low molecular weight heparin, enoxaparin, on the incidence of hemorrhage and thrombocytopenia in relation to baseline characteristics and subsequent invasive procedures. Rates of hemorrhage and thrombocytopenia were analyzed for UAP or non-ST-segment elevation AMI in patients included in the prospective, randomized, double-blind Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-wave Coronary Events (ESSENCE) study. Patients received either enoxaparin or UFH, plus aspirin, for 2 to 8 days. The overall rate of major hemorrhage (at 30 days) was comparable between the 2 groups (6.5% for enoxaparin vs. 7.0% for UFH, p = 0.6). The rate of major hemorrhage while on treatment was slightly higher in the enoxaparin group, but this was not significant (1.1% vs 0.7% for UFH, p = 0.204), as was the rate of major hemorrhage within 48 hours of coronary artery bypass grafting performed within 12 hours of treatment. However, the rate of minor hemorrhage was significantly higher in the enoxaparin group, with the majority being injection-site ecchymoses or hematomas (11.9% vs. 7.2% with UFH, p <0.001). Thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100,000 per mm(3)) occurred mainly in association with coronary bypass surgery, with a similar rate in both groups. Thus, enoxaparin is a well-tolerated alternative to UFH in the management of UAP or non-ST-segment elevation AMI. Despite the more effective antithrombotic effect, which results in fewer ischemic events, enoxaparin is not associated with an increase in the rate of major hemorrhagic complications, and is not significantly associated with thrombocytopenia, but is associated with an increase in minor injection site ecchymosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11728348     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)02082-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  Modelling the occurrence and severity of enoxaparin-induced bleeding and bruising events.

Authors:  Michael A Barras; Stephen B Duffull; John J Atherton; Bruce Green
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparins for avoiding heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in postoperative patients.

Authors:  Daniela R Junqueira; Liliane M Zorzela; Edson Perini
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-21

Review 3.  Combination of low molecular weight heparins with antiplatelet agents in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: an update.

Authors:  Marc Cohen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Case-control study of postprocedural arterial puncture site hemorrhage after neuroendovascular treatment.

Authors:  Yosuke Tamari; Takashi Izumi; Masahiro Nishihori; Tasuku Imai; Masashi Ito; Tetsuya Tsukada; Mamoru Ishida; Toshihiko Wakabayashi
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.131

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.