Literature DB >> 19910294

Intraoperative evaluation of breast tumor margins with optical coherence tomography.

Freddy T Nguyen1, Adam M Zysk, Eric J Chaney, Jan G Kotynek, Uretz J Oliphant, Frank J Bellafiore, Kendrith M Rowland, Patricia A Johnson, Stephen A Boppart.   

Abstract

As breast cancer screening rates increase, smaller and more numerous lesions are being identified earlier, leading to more breast-conserving surgical procedures. Achieving a clean surgical margin represents a technical challenge with important clinical implications. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is introduced as an intraoperative high-resolution imaging technique that assesses surgical breast tumor margins by providing real-time microscopic images up to 2 mm beneath the tissue surface. In a study of 37 patients split between training and study groups, OCT images covering 1 cm(2) regions were acquired from surgical margins of lumpectomy specimens, registered with ink, and correlated with corresponding histologic sections. A 17-patient training set used to establish standard imaging protocols and OCT evaluation criteria showed that areas of higher scattering tissue with a heterogeneous pattern were indicative of tumor cells and tumor tissue in contrast to lower scattering adipocytes found in normal breast tissue. The remaining 20 patients were enrolled into the feasibility study. Of these lumpectomy specimens, 11 were identified with a positive or close surgical margin and 9 were identified with a negative margin under OCT. Based on histologic findings, 9 true positives, 9 true negatives, 2 false positives, and 0 false negatives were found, yielding a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 82%. These results show the potential of OCT as a real-time method for intraoperative margin assessment in breast-conserving surgeries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19910294      PMCID: PMC2782920          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  47 in total

Review 1.  Optical coherence tomography: feasibility for basic research and image-guided surgery of breast cancer.

Authors:  Stephen A Boppart; Wei Luo; Daniel L Marks; Keith W Singletary
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Tara L Huston; Rodolfo Pigalarga; Michael P Osborne; Eleni Tousimis
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Computational methods for analysis of human breast tumor tissue in optical coherence tomography images.

Authors:  Adam M Zysk; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Role of resection margins in patients treated with breast conservation surgery.

Authors:  Giorgio Zavagno; Elena Goldin; Roberto Mencarelli; Giovanni Capitanio; Paola Del Bianco; Renato Marconato; Simone Mocellin; Giorgia Marconato; Valentina Belardinelli; Francesca Marcon; Donato Nitti
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Age-related structural and functional changes in the breast: multimodality correlation with digital mammography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Richard G Abramson; Ayse Mavi; Tevfik Cermik; Sandip Basu; Natasha E Wehrli; Mohamed Houseni; Shipra Mishra; Jay Udupa; Paras Lakhani; Andrew D A Maidment; Drew A Torigian; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.446

6.  Two-dimensional birefringence imaging in biological tissue by polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  J F de Boer; T E Milner; M J van Gemert; J S Nelson
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 3.776

Review 7.  Predictors of breast recurrence after conservative surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  J L Connolly; J Boyages; A J Nixon; G Peiró; I Gage; B Silver; A Recht; J R Harris; S J Schnitt
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  Automated algorithm for differentiation of human breast tissue using low coherence interferometry for fine needle aspiration biopsy guidance.

Authors:  Brian D Goldberg; Nicusor V Iftimia; Jason E Bressner; Martha B Pitman; Elkan Halpern; Brett E Bouma; Guillermo J Tearney
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Significance of margins of excision on breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Gregory P Swanson; Kim Rynearson; Richard Symmonds
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.339

10.  Recurrence rates and analysis of close or positive margins in patients treated without re-excision before radiation for breast cancer.

Authors:  Alyson McIntosh; Gary Freedman; Debra Eisenberg; Penny Anderson
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.339

View more
  133 in total

1.  Differentiation of ex vivo human breast tissue using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Fredrick A South; Eric J Chaney; Marina Marjanovic; Steven G Adie; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Polarization-sensitive interferometric synthetic aperture microscopy.

Authors:  Fredrick A South; Yuan-Zhi Liu; Yang Xu; Nathan D Shemonski; P Scott Carney; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Visualization and tissue classification of human breast cancer images using ultrahigh-resolution OCT.

Authors:  Xinwen Yao; Yu Gan; Ernest Chang; Hanina Hibshoosh; Sheldon Feldman; Christine Hendon
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.025

4.  Molecular histopathology by spectrally reconstructed nonlinear interferometric vibrational imaging.

Authors:  Praveen D Chowdary; Zhi Jiang; Eric J Chaney; Wladimir A Benalcazar; Daniel L Marks; Martin Gruebele; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Raman-Encoded Molecular Imaging with Topically Applied SERS Nanoparticles for Intraoperative Guidance of Lumpectomy.

Authors:  Yu Winston Wang; Nicholas P Reder; Soyoung Kang; Adam K Glaser; Qian Yang; Matthew A Wall; Sara H Javid; Suzanne M Dintzis; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Topical dual-stain difference imaging for rapid intra-operative tumor identification in fresh specimens.

Authors:  Scott C Davis; Summer L Gibbs; Jason R Gunn; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 3.776

7.  Wide-field quantitative micro-elastography of human breast tissue.

Authors:  Wes M Allen; Kelsey M Kennedy; Qi Fang; Lixin Chin; Andrea Curatolo; Lucinda Watts; Renate Zilkens; Synn Lynn Chin; Benjamin F Dessauvagie; Bruce Latham; Christobel M Saunders; Brendan F Kennedy
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Photoacoustic and fluorescence image-guided surgery using a multifunctional targeted nanoprobe.

Authors:  Lei Xi; Guangyin Zhou; Ning Gao; Lily Yang; David A Gonzalo; Steven J Hughes; Huabei Jiang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Optical Coherence Tomography Detects Necrotic Regions and Volumetrically Quantifies Multicellular Tumor Spheroids.

Authors:  Yongyang Huang; Shunqiang Wang; Qiongyu Guo; Sarah Kessel; Ian Rubinoff; Leo Li-Ying Chan; Peter Li; Yaling Liu; Jean Qiu; Chao Zhou
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Scatter spectroscopic imaging distinguishes between breast pathologies in tissues relevant to surgical margin assessment.

Authors:  Ashley M Laughney; Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy; Elizabeth J Rizzo; Mary C Schwab; Richard J Barth; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen; Wendy A Wells
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.