Literature DB >> 28264146

Visualization and tissue classification of human breast cancer images using ultrahigh-resolution OCT.

Xinwen Yao1, Yu Gan1, Ernest Chang2, Hanina Hibshoosh2, Sheldon Feldman2, Christine Hendon1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers, and recognized as the third leading cause of mortality in women. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) enables three dimensional visualization of biological tissue with micrometer level resolution at high speed, and can play an important role in early diagnosis and treatment guidance of breast cancer. In particular, ultra-high resolution (UHR) OCT provides images with better histological correlation. This paper compared UHR OCT performance with standard OCT in breast cancer imaging qualitatively and quantitatively. Automatic tissue classification algorithms were used to automatically detect invasive ductal carcinoma in ex vivo human breast tissue. STUDY DESIGN/
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human breast tissues, including non-neoplastic/normal tissues from breast reduction and tumor samples from mastectomy specimens, were excised from patients at Columbia University Medical Center. The tissue specimens were imaged by two spectral domain OCT systems at different wavelengths: a home-built ultra-high resolution (UHR) OCT system at 800 nm (measured as 2.72 μm axial and 5.52 μm lateral) and a commercial OCT system at 1,300 nm with standard resolution (measured as 6.5 μm axial and 15 μm lateral), and their imaging performances were analyzed qualitatively. Using regional features derived from OCT images produced by the two systems, we developed an automated classification algorithm based on relevance vector machine (RVM) to differentiate hollow-structured adipose tissue against solid tissue. We further developed B-scan based features for RVM to classify invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) against normal fibrous stroma tissue among OCT datasets produced by the two systems. For adipose classification, 32 UHR OCT B-scans from 9 normal specimens, and 28 standard OCT B-scans from 6 normal and 4 IDC specimens were employed. For IDC classification, 152 UHR OCT B-scans from 6 normal and 13 IDC specimens, and 104 standard OCT B-scans from 5 normal and 8 IDC specimens were employed.
RESULTS: We have demonstrated that UHR OCT images can produce images with better feature delineation compared with images produced by 1,300 nm OCT system. UHR OCT images of a variety of tissue types found in human breast tissue were presented. With a limited number of datasets, we showed that both OCT systems can achieve a good accuracy in identifying adipose tissue. Classification in UHR OCT images achieved higher sensitivity (94%) and specificity (93%) of adipose tissue than the sensitivity (91%) and specificity (76%) in 1,300 nm OCT images. In IDC classification, similarly, we achieved better results with UHR OCT images, featured an overall accuracy of 84%, sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 71% in this preliminary study.
CONCLUSION: In this study, we provided UHR OCT images of different normal and malignant breast tissue types, and qualitatively and quantitatively studied the texture and optical features from OCT images of human breast tissue at different resolutions. We developed an automated approach to differentiate adipose tissue, fibrous stroma, and IDC within human breast tissues. Our work may open the door toward automatic intraoperative OCT evaluation of early-stage breast cancer. Lasers Surg. Med. 49:258-269, 2017.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; image processing; optical coherence tomography; tissue classification

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28264146      PMCID: PMC5368015          DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Surg Med        ISSN: 0196-8092            Impact factor:   4.025


  35 in total

Review 1.  Optical coherence tomography: feasibility for basic research and image-guided surgery of breast cancer.

Authors:  Stephen A Boppart; Wei Luo; Daniel L Marks; Keith W Singletary
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Computational methods for analysis of human breast tumor tissue in optical coherence tomography images.

Authors:  Adam M Zysk; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Needle optical coherence elastography for the measurement of microscale mechanical contrast deep within human breast tissues.

Authors:  Kelsey M Kennedy; Robert A McLaughlin; Brendan F Kennedy; Alan Tien; Bruce Latham; Christobel M Saunders; David D Sampson
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 4.  Exploring breast with therapeutic ductoscopy.

Authors:  Fatih Levent Balci; Sheldon Marc Feldman
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2014-05

5.  Real-time Imaging of the Resection Bed Using a Handheld Probe to Reduce Incidence of Microscopic Positive Margins in Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Sarah J Erickson-Bhatt; Ryan M Nolan; Nathan D Shemonski; Steven G Adie; Jeffrey Putney; Donald Darga; Daniel T McCormick; Andrew J Cittadine; Adam M Zysk; Marina Marjanovic; Eric J Chaney; Guillermo L Monroy; Fredrick A South; Kimberly A Cradock; Z George Liu; Magesh Sundaram; Partha S Ray; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Relevance vector machine for optical diagnosis of cancer.

Authors:  Shovan K Majumder; Nirmalya Ghosh; Pradeep K Gupta
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.025

7.  Intraoperative Assessment of Final Margins with a Handheld Optical Imaging Probe During Breast-Conserving Surgery May Reduce the Reoperation Rate: Results of a Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Adam M Zysk; Kai Chen; Edward Gabrielson; Lorraine Tafra; Evelyn A May Gonzalez; Joseph K Canner; Eric B Schneider; Andrew J Cittadine; P Scott Carney; Stephen A Boppart; Kimiko Tsuchiya; Kristen Sawyer; Lisa K Jacobs
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Fluorescence lifetime imaging of unstained tissues: early results in human breast cancer.

Authors:  Paul J Tadrous; Jan Siegel; Paul M W French; Sami Shousha; El-Nasir Lalani; Gordon W H Stamp
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.996

9.  The Cole relaxation frequency as a parameter to identify cancer in breast tissue.

Authors:  W D Gregory; J J Marx; C W Gregory; W M Mikkelson; J A Tjoe; J Shell
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Automated algorithm for differentiation of human breast tissue using low coherence interferometry for fine needle aspiration biopsy guidance.

Authors:  Brian D Goldberg; Nicusor V Iftimia; Jason E Bressner; Martha B Pitman; Elkan Halpern; Brett E Bouma; Guillermo J Tearney
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.170

View more
  12 in total

1.  Characterization of the human myocardium by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Yu Gan; Theresa H Lye; Charles C Marboe; Christine P Hendon
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.207

2.  Multi-class classification of breast tissue using optical coherence tomography and attenuation imaging combined via deep learning.

Authors:  Ken Y Foo; Kyle Newman; Qi Fang; Peijun Gong; Hina M Ismail; Devina D Lakhiani; Renate Zilkens; Benjamin F Dessauvagie; Bruce Latham; Christobel M Saunders; Lixin Chin; Brendan F Kennedy
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.562

3.  Real-time Tracking and Classification of Tumor and Nontumor Tissue in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers Using Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy for Resection Margin Assessment.

Authors:  Scarlet Nazarian; Ioannis Gkouzionis; Michal Kawka; Marta Jamroziak; Josephine Lloyd; Ara Darzi; Nisha Patel; Daniel S Elson; Christopher J Peters
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 16.681

4.  Wide-field quantitative micro-elastography of human breast tissue.

Authors:  Wes M Allen; Kelsey M Kennedy; Qi Fang; Lixin Chin; Andrea Curatolo; Lucinda Watts; Renate Zilkens; Synn Lynn Chin; Benjamin F Dessauvagie; Bruce Latham; Christobel M Saunders; Brendan F Kennedy
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  The clinical usefulness of optical coherence tomography during cancer interventions.

Authors:  Labrinus van Manen; Jouke Dijkstra; Claude Boccara; Emilie Benoit; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Michalina J Gora; J Sven D Mieog
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Cross-Polarization OCT and OCT-Elastography for Differentiation of Breast Cancer Subtypes: Comparative Study.

Authors:  Ekaterina V Gubarkova; Elena B Kiseleva; Marina A Sirotkina; Dmitry A Vorontsov; Ksenia A Achkasova; Sergey S Kuznetsov; Konstantin S Yashin; Aleksander L Matveyev; Aleksander A Sovetsky; Lev A Matveev; Anton A Plekhanov; Alexey Y Vorontsov; Vladimir Y Zaitsev; Natalia D Gladkova
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-24

7.  Evaluating optical coherence tomography for surgical margin assessment of canine mammary tumours.

Authors:  Carolina Fabelo; Laura E Selmic; Pin-Cheh Huang; Jonathan P Samuelson; Jennifer K Reagan; Alexandra Kalamaras; Vincent Wavreille; Guillermo L Monroy; Marina Marjanovic; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Vet Comp Oncol       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 2.613

8.  Three-dimensional virtual histology in unprocessed resected tissues with photoacoustic remote sensing (PARS) microscopy and optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Authors:  Benjamin R Ecclestone; Zohreh Hosseinaee; Nima Abbasi; Kevan Bell; Deepak Dinakaran; John R Mackey; Parsin Haji Reza
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging system for intraoperative margin assessment for DCIS and invasive breast cancer using the ClearSight™ system in breast-conserving surgery-Results from a postmarketing study.

Authors:  Marc Thill; Iris Szwarcfiter; Katharina Kelling; Viviane van Haasteren; Eyal Kolka; Josefa Noelke; Zachi Peles; Moshe Papa; Sebastian Aulmann; Tanir Allweis
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.885

10.  Imaging of subendocardial adipose tissue and fiber orientation distributions in the human left atrium using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Theresa H Lye; Charles C Marboe; Christine P Hendon
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.