Literature DB >> 17414463

Recurrence rates and analysis of close or positive margins in patients treated without re-excision before radiation for breast cancer.

Alyson McIntosh1, Gary Freedman, Debra Eisenberg, Penny Anderson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examines the risk of local recurrence in a group of patients accepted for radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery despite having a close or positive resection margin. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two hundred patients with early-stage breast cancer were treated by radiation with a nonnegative margin < or =2 mm from January 1974 to September 2001. The median age was 61 years. Margins were positive in 29% and close (< or =2 mm) in 71%. The median dose was 64 to 66 Gy. The median follow up was 5.9 years.
RESULTS: The number of resection margins close or positive was 1 in 73% of patients, 2 in 14%, 3 in 1%, and unknown in 12%. The margin location was 23% anterior, 24% posterior, 12% medial, 12% lateral, 17% superior, and 12% inferior. Reasons for not reexcising were advanced age/comorbidities in 7%, anterior location under skin in 25%, posterior location to muscle in 15%, focal involvement in 13%, no extensive intraductal component in 5%, surgeon refusal in 15%, and patient refusal in 20%. There was a strong association between an anterior or posterior margin location and the rationale of no additional breast tissue at the margin to reexcise before radiation. The risk of local recurrence at 5 and 10 years was 3% and 5%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Further research of close and positive margins is needed to validate features identified in this series, particularly nonbreast tissue anatomic margins, that are associated with low risks of local recurrence after radiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17414463     DOI: 10.1097/01.coc.0000251357.45879.7f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  13 in total

1.  Tissue necrosis and its role in cancer progression.

Authors:  Adi Karsch-Bluman; Ariel Feiglin; Eliran Arbib; Tal Stern; Hila Shoval; Ouri Schwob; Michael Berger; Ofra Benny
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Histopathological features of invasion of breast invasive ductal carcinoma and safety of breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Chunping Liu; Huaxiong Pan; Zhi Li; Lan Shi; Tao Huang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2009-02-18

Review 3.  Diagnosing clean margins through Raman spectroscopy in human and animal mammary tumour surgery: a short review.

Authors:  I A Birtoiu; C Rizea; D Togoe; R M Munteanu; C Micsa; M I Rusu; M Tautan; L Braic; L O Scoicaru; A Parau; N D Becherescu-Barbu; M V Udrea; A Tonetto; R Notonier; C E A Grigorescu
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  The approach to an isolated close anterior margin in breast conserving surgery.

Authors:  L O'Connell; S Walsh; D Evoy; A O'Doherty; C Quinn; J Rothwell; J Geraghty; E W McDermott; R Prichard
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Cost Analysis of a Surgical Consensus Guideline in Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Authors:  Jennifer Yu; Leisha C Elmore; Amy E Cyr; Rebecca L Aft; William E Gillanders; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Surgical margin reporting in breast conserving surgery: Does compliance with guidelines affect re-excision and mastectomy rates?

Authors:  Sarah Persing; Mairin A Jerome; Ted A James; Peter Callas; John Mace; Michelle Sowden; Andrew Goodwin; Donald L Weaver; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 4.380

7.  Influence of surgical margins on the outcome of breast cancer patients: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Sergio Bernardi; Serena Bertozzi; Ambrogio P Londero; Giuliana Gentile; Vito Angione; Roberto Petri
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Intraoperative evaluation of breast tumor margins with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Freddy T Nguyen; Adam M Zysk; Eric J Chaney; Jan G Kotynek; Uretz J Oliphant; Frank J Bellafiore; Kendrith M Rowland; Patricia A Johnson; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  No Association of Positive Superficial and/or Deep Margins with Local Recurrence in Invasive Breast Cancer Treated with Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Authors:  Tae In Yoon; Jong Won Lee; Sae Byul Lee; Guiyun Sohn; Jisun Kim; Il Young Chung; Hee Jeong Kim; Beom Seok Ko; Byung Ho Son; Gyungyub Gong; Sung-Bae Kim; Su Ssan Kim; Seung Do Ahn; Minsung Chung; Sei Hyun Ahn
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 4.679

10.  Surgical outcome of patients with core-biopsy-proven nonpalpable breast carcinoma: a large cohort follow-up study.

Authors:  S van Esser; N H G M Peters; M A A J van den Bosch; W P Th M Mali; P H M Peeters; I H M Borel Rinkes; R van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.