PURPOSE: This study examines the risk of local recurrence in a group of patients accepted for radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery despite having a close or positive resection margin. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two hundred patients with early-stage breast cancer were treated by radiation with a nonnegative margin < or =2 mm from January 1974 to September 2001. The median age was 61 years. Margins were positive in 29% and close (< or =2 mm) in 71%. The median dose was 64 to 66 Gy. The median follow up was 5.9 years. RESULTS: The number of resection margins close or positive was 1 in 73% of patients, 2 in 14%, 3 in 1%, and unknown in 12%. The margin location was 23% anterior, 24% posterior, 12% medial, 12% lateral, 17% superior, and 12% inferior. Reasons for not reexcising were advanced age/comorbidities in 7%, anterior location under skin in 25%, posterior location to muscle in 15%, focal involvement in 13%, no extensive intraductal component in 5%, surgeon refusal in 15%, and patient refusal in 20%. There was a strong association between an anterior or posterior margin location and the rationale of no additional breast tissue at the margin to reexcise before radiation. The risk of local recurrence at 5 and 10 years was 3% and 5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Further research of close and positive margins is needed to validate features identified in this series, particularly nonbreast tissue anatomic margins, that are associated with low risks of local recurrence after radiation.
PURPOSE: This study examines the risk of local recurrence in a group of patients accepted for radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery despite having a close or positive resection margin. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two hundred patients with early-stage breast cancer were treated by radiation with a nonnegative margin < or =2 mm from January 1974 to September 2001. The median age was 61 years. Margins were positive in 29% and close (< or =2 mm) in 71%. The median dose was 64 to 66 Gy. The median follow up was 5.9 years. RESULTS: The number of resection margins close or positive was 1 in 73% of patients, 2 in 14%, 3 in 1%, and unknown in 12%. The margin location was 23% anterior, 24% posterior, 12% medial, 12% lateral, 17% superior, and 12% inferior. Reasons for not reexcising were advanced age/comorbidities in 7%, anterior location under skin in 25%, posterior location to muscle in 15%, focal involvement in 13%, no extensive intraductal component in 5%, surgeon refusal in 15%, and patient refusal in 20%. There was a strong association between an anterior or posterior margin location and the rationale of no additional breast tissue at the margin to reexcise before radiation. The risk of local recurrence at 5 and 10 years was 3% and 5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Further research of close and positive margins is needed to validate features identified in this series, particularly nonbreast tissue anatomic margins, that are associated with low risks of local recurrence after radiation.
Authors: I A Birtoiu; C Rizea; D Togoe; R M Munteanu; C Micsa; M I Rusu; M Tautan; L Braic; L O Scoicaru; A Parau; N D Becherescu-Barbu; M V Udrea; A Tonetto; R Notonier; C E A Grigorescu Journal: Interface Focus Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 3.906
Authors: L O'Connell; S Walsh; D Evoy; A O'Doherty; C Quinn; J Rothwell; J Geraghty; E W McDermott; R Prichard Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2019-03-11 Impact factor: 1.891
Authors: Jennifer Yu; Leisha C Elmore; Amy E Cyr; Rebecca L Aft; William E Gillanders; Julie A Margenthaler Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2017-04-14 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Sarah Persing; Mairin A Jerome; Ted A James; Peter Callas; John Mace; Michelle Sowden; Andrew Goodwin; Donald L Weaver; Brian L Sprague Journal: Breast Date: 2015-07-18 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: Freddy T Nguyen; Adam M Zysk; Eric J Chaney; Jan G Kotynek; Uretz J Oliphant; Frank J Bellafiore; Kendrith M Rowland; Patricia A Johnson; Stephen A Boppart Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-11-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Tae In Yoon; Jong Won Lee; Sae Byul Lee; Guiyun Sohn; Jisun Kim; Il Young Chung; Hee Jeong Kim; Beom Seok Ko; Byung Ho Son; Gyungyub Gong; Sung-Bae Kim; Su Ssan Kim; Seung Do Ahn; Minsung Chung; Sei Hyun Ahn Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-04-14 Impact factor: 4.679
Authors: S van Esser; N H G M Peters; M A A J van den Bosch; W P Th M Mali; P H M Peeters; I H M Borel Rinkes; R van Hillegersberg Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2009-05-13 Impact factor: 5.344