Literature DB >> 19909876

Stent gap by 64-detector computed tomographic angiography relationship to in-stent restenosis, fracture, and overlap failure.

Harvey S Hecht1, Sotir Polena, Vladimir Jelnin, Marcelo Jimenez, Tandeep Bhatti, Manish Parikh, Georgia Panagopoulos, Gary Roubin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to define the frequency of stent gaps by 64-detector computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and their relation to in-stent restenosis (ISR), stent fracture (SF), and overlap failure (OF).
BACKGROUND: SF defined by catheter angiography or intravascular ultrasound has been implicated in ISR.
METHODS: A total of 292 consecutive patients, with 613 stents, who underwent CTA were evaluated for stent gaps associated with decreased Hounsfield units. Correlations with catheter coronary angiography (CCA) were available in 143 patients with 384 stents.
RESULTS: Stent gaps were noted in 16.9% by CTA and 1.0% by CCA. ISR by CCA was noted in 46.1% of the stent gaps (p < 0.001) as determined by CCA, and stent gaps by CTA accounted for 27.8% of the total ISR (p < 0.001). In univariate analysis, stent diameter > or =3 mm was the only CCA characteristic significantly associated with stent gaps (p = 0.002), but was not a significant predictor by multivariate analysis. Bifurcation stents, underlying calcification, stent type, location, post-dilation, and overlapping stents were not observed to be predisposing factors. Excessive tortuosity and lack of conformability were not associated with stent gaps; however, their frequency was insufficient to permit meaningful analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Stent gap by CTA: 1) is associated with 28% of ISR, and ISR is found in 46% of stent gaps; 2) is associated with > or =3-mm stents by univariate (p = 0.002) but not by multivariate analysis; 3) is infrequently noted on catheter angiography; and 4) most likely represents SF in the setting of a single stent, and may represent SF or OF in overlapping stents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19909876     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  13 in total

1.  Prevalence and prognosis of coronary stent gap detected by multi-detector CT: a follow-up study.

Authors:  Xinghua Zhang; Li Yang; Haiyue Ju; Fan Zhang; Jian Wu; Bin He; Yundai Chen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Stent fracture and longitudinal compression detected on coronary CT angiography in the first- and new-generation drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Mi Sun Chung; Dong Hyun Yang; Young-Hak Kim; Jae-Hyung Roh; Jihyun Song; Joon-Won Kang; Jung-Min Ahn; Duk-Woo Park; Soo-Jin Kang; Seung-Whan Lee; Cheol Whan Lee; Seong-Wook Park; Seung-Jung Park; Tae-Hwan Lim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Are we aware of stent fracture?

Authors:  R D Acar; M Bulut; M Akcakoyun
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Coronary in-stent restenosis: predisposing clinical and stent-related factors, diagnostic performance and analyses of inaccuracies in 320-row computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Yung-Liang Wan; Pei-Kwei Tsay; Chun-Chi Chen; Yu-Hsiang Juan; Yu-Chieh Huang; Wen-Hui Chan; Ming-Shien Wen; I-Chang Hsieh
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Impact of sirolimus-eluting stent fractures without early cardiac events on long-term clinical outcomes: a multislice computed tomography study.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Ito; Masashi Kimura; Mariko Ehara; Mitsuyasu Terashima; Kenya Nasu; Yoshihisa Kinoshita; Maoto Habara; Etsuo Tsuchikane; Takahiko Suzuki
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Finite Element Analysis of the Implantation Process of Overlapping Stents.

Authors:  Jiang Xu; Jie Yang; Salman Sohrabi; Yihua Zhou; Yaling Liu
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 0.582

7.  CT Imaging of Coronary Stents: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken
Journal:  ISRN Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-11

8.  Stent fracture: how frequently is it recognized?

Authors:  Mohammed Khalil Mohsen; Awad Alqahtani; Jassim Al Suwaidi
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2013-04

9.  Detection of Postcoronary Stent Complication: Utility of 64-Slice Multidetector CT.

Authors:  Alpa Bharati; Suleman Merchant; Tilak Suvarna; Neha Parashar
Journal:  Case Rep Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-01

Review 10.  Coronary stent fracture: a recently appreciated phenomenon with clinical relevance.

Authors:  Madjid Chinikar; Parham Sadeghipour
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2014-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.