Literature DB >> 19903824

Evidence for ligand-mediated selective modulation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor activity.

Iain A Murray1, Jose L Morales, Colin A Flaveny, Brett C Dinatale, Chris Chiaro, Krishnegowda Gowdahalli, Shantu Amin, Gary H Perdew.   

Abstract

The concept of selective receptor modulators has been established for the nuclear steroid hormone receptors. Such selective modulators have been used therapeutically with great success in the treatment of cancer. However, this concept has not been examined with regard to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) because of the latent toxicity commonly associated with AHR activation. AHR-mediated toxicity is primarily derived from AHR binding to its dioxin response element (DRE) and driving expression of CYP1 family members, which have the capacity to metabolize procarcinogens to genotoxic carcinogens. Recent evidence using a non-DRE binding AHR mutant has established the DRE-independent suppression of inflammatory markers by the AHR. We wished to determine whether such DRE-independent repression with wild-type AHR could be dissociated from canonical DRE-dependent transactivation in a ligand-dependent manner and, in doing so, prove the concept of a selective AHR modulator (SAhRM). Here, we identify the selective estrogen receptor (ER) modulator Way-169916 as a dually selective modulator, binding both ER and AHR. Inflammatory gene expression associated with the cytokine-inducible acute-phase response (e.g., SAA1 and CRP) are diminished by Way-169916 in an AHR-dependent manner. Furthermore, activation of AHR by Way-169916 fails to stimulate canonical DRE-driven AHR-mediated CYP1A1 expression, thus eliminating the potential for AHR-mediated genotoxic stress. Such anti-inflammatory activity in the absence of DRE-mediated expression fulfills the major criteria of an SAhRM, which suggests that selective modulation of AHR is possible and renders the AHR a therapeutically viable drug target for the amelioration of inflammatory disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19903824      PMCID: PMC2812074          DOI: 10.1124/mol.109.061788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.436


  31 in total

1.  Activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor by TCDD prevents diabetes in NOD mice and increases Foxp3+ T cells in pancreatic lymph nodes.

Authors:  Nancy I Kerkvliet; Linda B Steppan; William Vorachek; Shannon Oda; David Farrer; Carmen P Wong; Duy Pham; Dan V Mourich
Journal:  Immunotherapy       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.196

2.  Quantitative analysis of benzo[a]pyrene biotransformation and adduct formation in Ahr knockout mice.

Authors:  Carlos Sagredo; Steinar Øvrebø; Aage Haugen; Yoshiaki Fujii-Kuriyama; Rita Baera; Ingrid V Botnen; Steen Mollerup
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 4.372

3.  Mechanism of action and development of selective aryl hydrocarbon receptor modulators for treatment of hormone-dependent cancers (Review).

Authors:  Stephen Safe; Andrew McDougal
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.650

4.  Identification of pathway-selective estrogen receptor ligands that inhibit NF-kappaB transcriptional activity.

Authors:  Christopher C Chadwick; Susan Chippari; Edward Matelan; Lisa Borges-Marcucci; Amy M Eckert; James C Keith; Leo M Albert; Yelena Leathurby; Heather A Harris; Ramesh A Bhat; Mark Ashwell; Eugene Trybulski; Richard C Winneker; Steven J Adelman; Robert J Steffan; Douglas C Harnish
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Ligand selectivity and gene regulation by the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor in transgenic mice.

Authors:  Colin A Flaveny; Iain A Murray; Chris R Chiaro; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 4.436

6.  Analysis of glucocorticoid signalling by gene targeting.

Authors:  H M Reichardt; K H Kaestner; O Wessely; P Gass; W Schmid; G Schütz
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.292

7.  Control of T(reg) and T(H)17 cell differentiation by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  Francisco J Quintana; Alexandre S Basso; Antonio H Iglesias; Thomas Korn; Mauricio F Farez; Estelle Bettelli; Mario Caccamo; Mohamed Oukka; Howard L Weiner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-03-23       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor links TH17-cell-mediated autoimmunity to environmental toxins.

Authors:  Marc Veldhoen; Keiji Hirota; Astrid M Westendorf; Jan Buer; Laure Dumoutier; Jean-Christophe Renauld; Brigitta Stockinger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-03-23       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-mediated impairment of B cell differentiation involves dysregulation of paired box 5 (Pax5) isoform, Pax5a.

Authors:  Dina Schneider; Maria A Manzan; Robert B Crawford; Weimin Chen; Norbert E Kaminski
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Ah receptor represses acute-phase response gene expression without binding to its cognate response element.

Authors:  Rushang D Patel; Iain A Murray; Colin A Flaveny; Ann Kusnadi; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 5.662

View more
  49 in total

Review 1.  Ah receptor ligands and their impacts on gut resilience: structure-activity effects.

Authors:  Stephen Safe; Arul Jayaraman; Robert S Chapkin
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 2.  Regulation of central nervous system autoimmunity by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  Francisco J Quintana
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 9.623

3.  Hydroxylated Chalcones as Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Agonists: Structure-Activity Effects.

Authors:  Hyejin Park; Un-Ho Jin; Keshav Karki; Clinton Allred; Laurie A Davidson; Robert S Chapkin; Asuka A Orr; Farrhin Nowshad; Arul Jayaraman; Phanourios Tamamis; Stephen Safe
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Dietary fat is a lipid source in 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-ρ-dioxin (TCDD)-elicited hepatic steatosis in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Michelle Manente Angrish; Bryan David Mets; Arthur Daniel Jones; Timothy Richard Zacharewski
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Identification of a high-affinity ligand that exhibits complete aryl hydrocarbon receptor antagonism.

Authors:  Kayla J Smith; Iain A Murray; Rachel Tanos; John Tellew; Anthony E Boitano; William H Bisson; Siva K Kolluri; Michael P Cooke; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 4.030

6.  The transcription Factor AHR prevents the differentiation of a stage 3 innate lymphoid cell subset to natural killer cells.

Authors:  Tiffany Hughes; Edward L Briercheck; Aharon G Freud; Rossana Trotta; Susan McClory; Steven D Scoville; Karen Keller; Youcai Deng; Jordan Cole; Nicholas Harrison; Charlene Mao; Jianying Zhang; Don M Benson; Jianhua Yu; Michael A Caligiuri
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 7.  Indole and Tryptophan Metabolism: Endogenous and Dietary Routes to Ah Receptor Activation.

Authors:  Troy D Hubbard; Iain A Murray; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.922

8.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor is a tumor suppressor-like gene in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Un-Ho Jin; Keshav Karki; Yating Cheng; Sharon K Michelhaugh; Sandeep Mittal; Stephen Safe
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands in cancer: friend and foe.

Authors:  Iain A Murray; Andrew D Patterson; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Atranorin and lecanoric acid antagonize TCDD-induced xenobiotic response element-driven activity, but not xenobiotic response element-independent activity.

Authors:  Ken-Ichi Nakashima; Hiroki Tanabe; Yoshiaki Fujii-Kuriyama; Hidetoshi Hayashi; Makoto Inoue
Journal:  J Nat Med       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.343

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.