Literature DB >> 21493753

Identification of a high-affinity ligand that exhibits complete aryl hydrocarbon receptor antagonism.

Kayla J Smith1, Iain A Murray, Rachel Tanos, John Tellew, Anthony E Boitano, William H Bisson, Siva K Kolluri, Michael P Cooke, Gary H Perdew.   

Abstract

The biological functions of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) can be delineated into dioxin response element (DRE)-dependent or -independent activities. Ligands exhibiting either full or partial agonist activity, e.g., 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and α-naphthoflavone, have been demonstrated to potentiate both DRE-dependent and -independent AHR function. In contrast, the recently identified selective AHR modulators (SAhRMs), e.g., 1-allyl-3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-7-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-indazole (SGA360), bias AHR toward DRE-independent functionality while displaying antagonism with regard to ligand-induced DRE-dependent transcription. Recent studies have expanded the physiological role of AHR to include modulation of hematopoietic progenitor expansion and immunoregulation. It remains to be established whether such physiological roles are mediated through DRE-dependent or -independent pathways. Here, we present evidence for a third class of AHR ligand, "pure" or complete antagonists with the capacity to suppress both DRE-dependent and -independent AHR functions, which may facilitate dissection of physiological AHR function with regard to DRE or non-DRE-mediated signaling. Competitive ligand binding assays together with in silico modeling identify N-(2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl)-9-isopropyl-2-(5-methylpyridin-3-yl)-9H-purin-6-amine (GNF351) as a high-affinity AHR ligand. DRE-dependent reporter assays, in conjunction with quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of AHR targets, reveal GNF351 as a potent AHR antagonist that demonstrates efficacy in the nanomolar range. Furthermore, unlike many currently used AHR antagonists, e.g., α-naphthoflavone, GNF351 is devoid of partial agonist potential. It is noteworthy that in a model of AHR-mediated DRE-independent function, i.e., suppression of cytokine-induced acute-phase gene expression, GNF351 has the capacity to antagonize agonist and SAhRM-mediated suppression of SAA1. Such data indicate that GNF351 is a pure antagonist with the capacity to inhibit both DRE-dependent and -independent activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21493753      PMCID: PMC3126639          DOI: 10.1124/jpet.110.178392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  25 in total

1.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor antagonists promote the expansion of human hematopoietic stem cells.

Authors:  Anthony E Boitano; Jian Wang; Russell Romeo; Laure C Bouchez; Albert E Parker; Sue E Sutton; John R Walker; Colin A Flaveny; Gary H Perdew; Michael S Denison; Peter G Schultz; Michael P Cooke
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Suppression of cytokine-mediated complement factor gene expression through selective activation of the Ah receptor with 3',4'-dimethoxy-α-naphthoflavone.

Authors:  Iain A Murray; Colin A Flaveny; Christopher R Chiaro; Arun K Sharma; Rachel S Tanos; Jennifer C Schroeder; Shantu G Amin; William H Bisson; Siva K Kolluri; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 4.436

3.  Photoaffinity labelling of the Ah receptor.

Authors:  A Poland; E Glover; H Ebetino; A Kende
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  1986 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 6.023

4.  Protein kinase C activity is required for aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway-mediated signal transduction.

Authors:  W P Long; M Pray-Grant; J C Tsai; G H Perdew
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.436

5.  Mechanism of action and development of selective aryl hydrocarbon receptor modulators for treatment of hormone-dependent cancers (Review).

Authors:  Stephen Safe; Andrew McDougal
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.650

Review 6.  Ah receptor signaling pathways.

Authors:  J V Schmidt; C A Bradfield
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 13.827

7.  Mechanistic insights into the events that lead to synergistic induction of interleukin 6 transcription upon activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and inflammatory signaling.

Authors:  Brett C DiNatale; Jennifer C Schroeder; Lauren J Francey; Ann Kusnadi; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Agonistic and antagonistic effects of alpha-naphthoflavone on dioxin receptor function. Role of the basic region helix-loop-helix dioxin receptor partner factor Arnt.

Authors:  A Wilhelmsson; M L Whitelaw; J A Gustafsson; L Poellinger
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-07-22       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Species-specific recombinant cell lines as bioassay systems for the detection of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-like chemicals.

Authors:  P M Garrison; K Tullis; J M Aarts; A Brouwer; J P Giesy; M S Denison
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1996-04

10.  Identification of 3'-methoxy-4'-nitroflavone as a pure aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor antagonist and evidence for more than one form of the nuclear Ah receptor in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Y F Lu; M Santostefano; B D Cunningham; M D Threadgill; S Safe
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1995-01-10       Impact factor: 4.013

View more
  45 in total

Review 1.  Ah receptor ligands and their impacts on gut resilience: structure-activity effects.

Authors:  Stephen Safe; Arul Jayaraman; Robert S Chapkin
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 5.635

2.  In silico identification of an aryl hydrocarbon receptor antagonist with biological activity in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Ashley J Parks; Michael P Pollastri; Mark E Hahn; Elizabeth A Stanford; Olga Novikov; Diana G Franks; Sarah E Haigh; Supraja Narasimhan; Trent D Ashton; Timothy G Hopper; Dmytro Kozakov; Dimitri Beglov; Sandor Vajda; Jennifer J Schlezinger; David H Sherr
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.436

3.  The transcription Factor AHR prevents the differentiation of a stage 3 innate lymphoid cell subset to natural killer cells.

Authors:  Tiffany Hughes; Edward L Briercheck; Aharon G Freud; Rossana Trotta; Susan McClory; Steven D Scoville; Karen Keller; Youcai Deng; Jordan Cole; Nicholas Harrison; Charlene Mao; Jianying Zhang; Don M Benson; Jianhua Yu; Michael A Caligiuri
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 4.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands in cancer: friend and foe.

Authors:  Iain A Murray; Andrew D Patterson; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Omeprazole Inhibits Pancreatic Cancer Cell Invasion through a Nongenomic Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Pathway.

Authors:  Un-Ho Jin; Sang-Bae Kim; Stephen Safe
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.739

6.  Obesity and fatty liver are prevented by inhibition of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in both female and male mice.

Authors:  Benjamin J Moyer; Itzel Y Rojas; Joanna S Kerley-Hamilton; Krishnamurthy V Nemani; Heidi W Trask; Carol S Ringelberg; Barjor Gimi; Eugene Demidenko; Craig R Tomlinson
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Atranorin and lecanoric acid antagonize TCDD-induced xenobiotic response element-driven activity, but not xenobiotic response element-independent activity.

Authors:  Ken-Ichi Nakashima; Hiroki Tanabe; Yoshiaki Fujii-Kuriyama; Hidetoshi Hayashi; Makoto Inoue
Journal:  J Nat Med       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.343

8.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor antagonism mitigates cytokine-mediated inflammatory signalling in primary human fibroblast-like synoviocytes.

Authors:  Tejas S Lahoti; Kaarthik John; Jarod M Hughes; Ann Kusnadi; Iain A Murray; Gowdahalli Krishnegowda; Shantu Amin; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 9.  Role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in carcinogenesis and potential as a drug target.

Authors:  Stephen Safe; Syng-Ook Lee; Un-Ho Jin
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Ah receptor antagonism represses head and neck tumor cell aggressive phenotype.

Authors:  Brett C DiNatale; Kayla Smith; Kaarthik John; Gowdahalli Krishnegowda; Shantu G Amin; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 5.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.