Literature DB >> 19299563

Ligand selectivity and gene regulation by the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor in transgenic mice.

Colin A Flaveny1, Iain A Murray, Chris R Chiaro, Gary H Perdew.   

Abstract

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is a ligand-inducible transcription factor that displays interspecies differences with the human and mouse AHR C-terminal region sequences sharing only 58% amino acid sequence identity. Compared with the mouse AHR (mAHR), the human AHR (hAHR) displays approximately 10-fold lower relative affinity for prototypical AHR ligands such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, which has been attributed to the amino acid residue valine 381 (alanine 375 in the mAHR) in the ligand binding domain of the hAHR. We investigated whether the 10-fold difference in ligand-binding affinity between the mAHR and hAHR would be observed with a diverse range of AHR ligands. To test this hypothesis, ligand binding assays were performed using the photo-affinity ligand 2-azido-3-[(125)I]iodo-7,8-dibromodibenzo-p-dioxin and liver cytosol isolated from hepatocyte-specific transgenic hAHR mice and C57BL/6J mice. It is noteworthy that competitive ligand-binding assays revealed that, compared with the mAHR, the hAHR has a higher relative affinity for certain compounds, including indirubin [(2Z)-2,3-biindole-2,3 (1'H,1'H)-dione and quercetin (2-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl)-3,5,7-trihydroxy-4H-chromen-4-one]. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays revealed that indirubin was more efficient at transforming the hAHR compared with the mAHR. Indirubin was also a more potent inducer of Cyp1a1 expression in transgenic hAHR mouse hepatocytes compared with C57BL/6J mouse hepatocytes. These observations suggest that indirubin is a potent hAHR ligand that is able to selectively bind to and activate the hAHR. These discoveries imply that there may be a significant degree of structural divergence between mAHR and hAHR ligands and highlights the importance of the hAHR transgenic mouse as a model to study the hAHR in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19299563      PMCID: PMC2684888          DOI: 10.1124/mol.109.054825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.436


  26 in total

1.  Photoaffinity labelling of the Ah receptor.

Authors:  A Poland; E Glover; H Ebetino; A Kende
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  1986 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 6.023

2.  Expression of hepatitis B virus X protein does not alter the accumulation of spontaneous mutations in transgenic mice.

Authors:  C R Madden; M J Finegold; B L Slagle
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Characterization and strain distribution pattern of the murine Ah receptor specified by the Ahd and Ahb-3 alleles.

Authors:  A Poland; E Glover
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.436

4.  Construction of reporter yeasts for mouse aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand activity.

Authors:  Masanobu Kawanishi; Michiyo Sakamoto; Akihide Ito; Kyoko Kishi; Takashi Yagi
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2003-09-09       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Distinct response to dioxin in an arylhydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-humanized mouse.

Authors:  Takashi Moriguchi; Hozumi Motohashi; Tomonori Hosoya; Osamu Nakajima; Satoru Takahashi; Seiichiroh Ohsako; Yasunobu Aoki; Noriko Nishimura; Chiharu Tohyama; Yoshiaki Fujii-Kuriyama; Masayuki Yamamoto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Different structural requirements of the ligand binding domain of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor for high- and low-affinity ligand binding and receptor activation.

Authors:  Maria Backlund; Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.436

7.  Characterization of the Ah receptor and aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase induction by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and benz(a)anthracene in the human A431 squamous cell carcinoma line.

Authors:  P A Harper; C L Golas; A B Okey
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Use of 2-azido-3-[125I]iodo-7,8-dibromodibenzo-p-dioxin as a probe to determine the relative ligand affinity of human versus mouse aryl hydrocarbon receptor in cultured cells.

Authors:  Preeti Ramadoss; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.436

9.  The mouse and human Ah receptor differ in recognition of LXXLL motifs.

Authors:  Colin Flaveny; Rashmeet K Reen; Ann Kusnadi; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 4.013

10.  Distinct positive and negative elements control the limited hepatocyte and choroid plexus expression of transthyretin in transgenic mice.

Authors:  C Yan; R H Costa; J E Darnell; J D Chen; T A Van Dyke
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  57 in total

Review 1.  Ah receptor ligands and their impacts on gut resilience: structure-activity effects.

Authors:  Stephen Safe; Arul Jayaraman; Robert S Chapkin
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 5.635

2.  Identification of a high-affinity ligand that exhibits complete aryl hydrocarbon receptor antagonism.

Authors:  Kayla J Smith; Iain A Murray; Rachel Tanos; John Tellew; Anthony E Boitano; William H Bisson; Siva K Kolluri; Michael P Cooke; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 3.  Indole and Tryptophan Metabolism: Endogenous and Dietary Routes to Ah Receptor Activation.

Authors:  Troy D Hubbard; Iain A Murray; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 4.  Tissue metabolism and the inflammatory bowel diseases.

Authors:  Jordi M Lanis; Daniel J Kao; Erica E Alexeev; Sean P Colgan
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Toxicokinetics of benzo[a]pyrene in humans: Extensive metabolism as determined by UPLC-accelerator mass spectrometry following oral micro-dosing.

Authors:  Erin Madeen; Lisbeth K Siddens; Sandra Uesugi; Tammie McQuistan; Richard A Corley; Jordan Smith; Katrina M Waters; Susan C Tilton; Kim A Anderson; Ted Ognibene; Kenneth Turteltaub; David E Williams
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 6.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands in cancer: friend and foe.

Authors:  Iain A Murray; Andrew D Patterson; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  The uremic toxin 3-indoxyl sulfate is a potent endogenous agonist for the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  Jennifer C Schroeder; Brett C Dinatale; Iain A Murray; Colin A Flaveny; Qiang Liu; Elizabeth M Laurenzana; Jyh Ming Lin; Stephen C Strom; Curtis J Omiecinski; Shantu Amin; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Evidence for ligand-mediated selective modulation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor activity.

Authors:  Iain A Murray; Jose L Morales; Colin A Flaveny; Brett C Dinatale; Chris Chiaro; Krishnegowda Gowdahalli; Shantu Amin; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 4.436

9.  Malassezia yeasts produce a collection of exceptionally potent activators of the Ah (dioxin) receptor detected in diseased human skin.

Authors:  Prokopios Magiatis; Periklis Pappas; George Gaitanis; Nikitia Mexia; Eleni Melliou; Maria Galanou; Christophoros Vlachos; Konstantina Stathopoulou; Alexios Leandros Skaltsounis; Marios Marselos; Aristea Velegraki; Michael S Denison; Ioannis D Bassukas
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 8.551

10.  TCDD and a putative endogenous AhR ligand, ITE, elicit the same immediate changes in gene expression in mouse lung fibroblasts.

Authors:  Ellen C Henry; Stephen L Welle; Thomas A Gasiewicz
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.