Literature DB >> 27286978

Pudendal nerve testing does not contribute to surgical decision making following anorectal testing in patients with faecal incontinence.

Edward A Cooper1,2, Katie J De-Loyde3, Christopher J Young4,5,6, Heather L Shepherd3, Caroline Wright4,5,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Faecal incontinence (FI) is a debilitating condition, which affects approximately 2-17 % of the population. Clinical assessment, physiological testing and imaging are usually used to evaluate the pathophysiology and guide management of FI. By analysing patient characteristics, symptoms and investigative findings, the aim of this study was to identify which patient characteristics and investigations influence patient management.
METHODS: Data was prospectively collected for all patients with FI presenting to a single surgeon at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, between March 2002 and September 2013. Continuous data was analysed using the independent T-test. Categorical data was analysed using chi-square tests and logistic regression.
RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-eight patients were reviewed; 96 % were female and the mean age was 57 years. Surgical intervention was recommended for 185 patients (47 %) should biofeedback fail. Independent predictors for surgical recommendation were prolapse (p < 0.001, adjusted OR = 4.9 [CI 2.9-8.2]), a functional sphincter length <1 cm (p = 0.032, OR = 1.7 [CI 1.1-2.8]), an external anal sphincter defect (p = 0.028, OR = 1.8 [CI 1.1-3.1]) and a Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score ≥10 (p = 0.029, OR = 1.7 [CI 1.1-2.6]).
CONCLUSION: Independent predictors of surgical recommendation included the presence of prolapse, a functional sphincter length <1 cm, an external anal sphincter defect and a Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score ≥ 10. Pudendal neuropathy was not a predictor of surgical intervention, leading us to question the utility of this investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anorectal testing; Faecal incontinence; Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency; Surgical intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27286978     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-016-2617-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  17 in total

Review 1.  Anal sphincter biofeedback and pelvic floor exercises for faecal incontinence in adults--a systematic review.

Authors:  C Norton; M A Kamm
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 8.171

2.  Management of faecal incontinence in adults.

Authors:  Mukhtar Ahmad; Iain J D McCallum; Mark Mercer-Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-06-15

Review 3.  Con: Anorectal manometry and imaging are not necessary in patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Arnold Wald
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 4.  Clinical practice. Fecal incontinence in adults.

Authors:  Arnold Wald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Diagnosis and treatment of faecal incontinence: Consensus statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery and the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists.

Authors:  Filippo Pucciani; Donato Francesco Altomare; Giuseppe Dodi; Ezio Falletto; Alvise Frasson; Iacopo Giani; Jacopo Martellucci; Gabriele Naldini; Vittorio Piloni; Guido Sciaudone; Antonio Bove; Renato Bocchini; Massimo Bellini; Pietro Alduini; Edda Battaglia; Francesca Galeazzi; Piera Rossitti; Paolo Usai Satta
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.088

6.  A prospective evaluation of the value of anorectal physiology in the management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  H Liberman; J Faria; C A Ternent; G J Blatchford; M A Christensen; A G Thorson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  The utility of pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies in idiopathic incontinence.

Authors:  Rocco Ricciardi; Anders F Mellgren; Robert D Madoff; Nancy N Baxter; Richard E Karulf; Susan C Parker
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  An Evidence-Based Approach to the Evaluation, Diagnostic Assessment and Treatment of Fecal Incontinence in Women.

Authors:  Isuzu Meyer; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep       Date:  2014-09

9.  Anal physiology testing in fecal incontinence: is it of any value?

Authors:  Massarat Zutshi; Levilester Salcedo; Jeffrey Hammel; Tracy Hull
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Unilateral pudendal neuropathy. Impact on outcome of anal sphincter repair.

Authors:  Y P Sangwan; J A Coller; R C Barrett; P L Roberts; J J Murray; L Rusin; D J Schoetz
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  3 in total

1.  Dynamic transperineal ultrasonography correlates with prolonged pudendal nerve latency in female with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Luigi Brusciano; Claudio Gambardella; Bruno Roche; Salvatore Tolone; Roberto Maria Romano; Francesco Tuccillo; Gianmattia Del Genio; Gianmattia Terracciano; Giorgia Gualtieri; Ludovico Docimo
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-06-28

2.  Pudendal nerve testing.

Authors:  Viroj Wiwanitkit
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Electrophysiological Basis of Fecal Incontinence and Its Implications for Treatment.

Authors:  Elroy Patrick Weledji
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2017-10-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.