BACKGROUND: Anal pressure vectography is an anorectal physiology study that evaluates the radial pressures in the anal canal from which a symmetry index that indicates the anatomical integrity of the anal sphincter can be calculated. However, there are conflicting opinions of its validity. Since endoanal ultrasonography (EAUS) has been recognized as the gold standard for detecting anal sphincter disruption, the aim of this pilot study was to observe whether a vector symmetry index (VSI) determined at the level of injury shown in EAUS has a better sensitivity than the overall VSI in detecting anal sphincter disruption. METHODS: A group of 11 women in whom EAUS had shown defects in both the internal and the external anal sphincters underwent anorectal manometry using a water-perfused vector manometry catheter, and the overall VSI and the VSI at the level of sphincter disruption (shown on EAUS) were calculated. RESULTS: Overall VSI at rest indicated internal sphincter injury in 7 women (64%) but the VSI at the level of disruption indicated internal sphincter injury in all 11 women (100%, p=0.0137). Similarly, the overall VSI at squeeze indicated external sphincter injury in 6 women (55%), but the VSI at the level of disruption indicated external sphincter injury in 10 women (91%, p=0.0049). CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot study showed that EAUS and VSI are equally sensitive in diagnosing a localized anal sphincter defect, provided a segment-for-segment comparison is carried out.
BACKGROUND: Anal pressure vectography is an anorectal physiology study that evaluates the radial pressures in the anal canal from which a symmetry index that indicates the anatomical integrity of the anal sphincter can be calculated. However, there are conflicting opinions of its validity. Since endoanal ultrasonography (EAUS) has been recognized as the gold standard for detecting anal sphincter disruption, the aim of this pilot study was to observe whether a vector symmetry index (VSI) determined at the level of injury shown in EAUS has a better sensitivity than the overall VSI in detecting anal sphincter disruption. METHODS: A group of 11 women in whom EAUS had shown defects in both the internal and the external anal sphincters underwent anorectal manometry using a water-perfused vector manometry catheter, and the overall VSI and the VSI at the level of sphincter disruption (shown on EAUS) were calculated. RESULTS: Overall VSI at rest indicated internal sphincter injury in 7 women (64%) but the VSI at the level of disruption indicated internal sphincter injury in all 11 women (100%, p=0.0137). Similarly, the overall VSI at squeeze indicated external sphincter injury in 6 women (55%), but the VSI at the level of disruption indicated external sphincter injury in 10 women (91%, p=0.0049). CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot study showed that EAUS and VSI are equally sensitive in diagnosing a localized anal sphincter defect, provided a segment-for-segment comparison is carried out.
Authors: Andrea Frudinger; Steve Halligan; John A D Spencer; Clive I Bartram; Michael A Kamm; Raimund Winter Journal: BJOG Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 6.531
Authors: A P Zbar; W A Kmiot; M Aslam; A Williams; A Hider; R A Audisio; A Chiappa; N deSouza Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 4.585